Ground ZER0 in the "UNgay" Paradigm Shift!

PREJUDICES

Quick Links:

Intro (reopens site)
G0Y? Eh?
No-Apology
God Hates:
I Believe
Beautiful-Hide
G0YDAR
Male|Mail
Links!
0ur Groups
Literature
Peripheral View
Support Us
It Happens
Prejudices
UNvirgins
The 'LINE':
Flame
'n Fags
Head's up Dad!
GYM-g0ys!
Make'n L
0ve
Pedastery?
Peeps 101
Terr0rists
BrokeBack
'Da 'Scene'
Aesthetics 101
Empathy is G0Y

 

 


To Quote Radio Personality
Steve Yuhas:

'As your streets are closed off this summer to make way for men in dresses and dykes on bikes along with the men in thongs contorting themselves into odd poses on floats – keep in mind that gays are doing this on their own and painting their own community with the stereotypes that they are demanding so many pretend are just slander by religious people and those “out of the mainstream.” Remind them that you saw it in their parade, at their rally and during the time when they were in the spotlight in a festival that they created and generated for themselves and the world to see. That won’t shut them up or stop them from complaining, but it may give them cause to think a little bit about the consequences of their behavior.

What an interesting world we live in – gays keep the stereotypes of gayness going and normal people get disciplined for endorsing them. Typically parades and protests are meant to change minds: marches against abortion are used to stop abortion, marches against taxes are used to stop the increase of taxes, but only in the world of fags, dykes and queers are marches used to put on display the stereotypes of being gay demanding legislation against exactly the same thing: Political Science 101 – if you want someone to stop calling you a fag – stop calling yourself one first.

“Watch my parade, endorse the political positions on my signs, but forget what I’m actually doing or what I look like because if you don’t – you’re an intolerant bigot.” Only gays could get away with that and luckily, since they’ve been doing the same thing for 30 years without success in their cause, most people in the real world understand the hypocrisy and ignore it.'

- Steve Yuhas is a G0Y columnist and radio talk show host on KOGO AM 600 based in San Diego. He may be reached at steve@steveyuhas.com or www.steveyuhas.com





 It seemed prudent to put together an essay on the concept of prejudice & how the GAY community is both causation & victim due to the spokespeople it chooses to represent "who is gay".  To help me illustrate my point: I'll tell you that the African American in the photo to the left earns over $200,000 per year!  Can you pick out the African-American from the image on the left? 
Really?  If you said,  "the woman", you'd be absolutely wrong.  The picture was taken in Haiti and the man is a doctor who was born in South Africa & also has his Canadian Citizenship.  He's AFRICAN-AMERICAN in the truest, lawful, sense of the term.  The woman is Haitian. 
But how many people instantly associate dark skin with the term "African" and the term "American" with "USA" (Canada is in North America)!  Those labels are forms of prejudice; --& subtly promoted by mass media without a single thought or concern for the truth.


Stoopid Questions:

"Is he gay?", 
or "Is he a homosexual?". 

How many times in your life have you heard those questions asked?  Excuse my vernacular - but what the PHUCK do those questions mean?

  • Does he like men?
  • Does he EXCLUSIVELY like men?
  • Does he butt-phuck men?
  • Does he date women but like men too (maybe more than women)?

And: Why was "BrokeBack mountain" called a "gay" movie? Both main characters have wives & kids. Isn't it a "BIsexual" movie about 2 guys with wives - who also loved each other & had a fetish for arse-sex? Since this is so obvious; - why is is called a "gay themed" movie? Does the "arse-sex" make it "gay"? 
WAKE THE PHUCK UP PEOPLE!

For those who have spent any real time on this website, the terms "STRAIGHT, BI & GAY" are words often used by people who can't think, won't think, or are simply unaware of the fact that sexual attraction is a CONTINUUM; -- & the minority of people are at the end points of either extreme in orientation.

Based on a poll of over 50,000 people:

0ver 60% admitted some degree of same gender affection (K1-K6 on chart). [K0-K5] can all "EMULATE K0" in the bedroom! But K6 can fake K0 only in words (been there, done that).
So then, the question, "Is he gay?", seems to have some prejudices attached to it that are nowhere supported by the facts.  If one was to look at the FACTS, the PRESUMPTION would be that "He" is probably attracted in some degree to members of his own gender. 
This statistically means almost EVERYONE!

The better question would be: "Is he on a Kinsey-endpoint?".  But - in light of current prejudices - we know what that question would suggest about the one asking it!

It took the most brilliant minds of his day, about 5-years to contemplate the implications of Einstein's E=MC2. And even then, his theory didn't have a "gay stigma" attached to it. In light of that, expect society to cling to the outmoded thinking of 3 "sexuality-checkboxes" until, say - 2025 - until grasping the implications of the chart above! It will probably be 2050 until everyone looks back on the prejudices of the 20th & mid 21st century for what they were.  Perhaps I'm being an optimist?    


Can you:

Locate the gay men in the "pride parade" composite picture on the right?  You find the task a little bit easier?  Are these NOT the stereotype'd images many people visualize when the term "gay" comes up? 

In the image at the page top, it's clearly obvious that it is the mass-media that is primarily responsible for people associating "dark" with "African" when the fact is that there are millions of white Africans and many of those have American (whatever country) citizenship (making them TRUE African Americans).  But the media promotes a giant prejudice tying color with geography and the term "American" with the USA-alone. And those prejudices are fueled by the small IQ's in media & "political correctness". 

The prejudices associated with the images to the RIGHT are likewise media driven -- but with one key exception: It is the GAY COMMUNITY ITSELF that drives the message that "GAY-MEN are gender bending oddities".  Other images that come into the public mind when the topic is gay-men are like these (Left/Below):

Such images - created by the gay-pride & gay-porn -- give a shocking view into the minds of the gay-male paradigm.  The image on the left is not some fringe publication.  It is an ad that arrived uninvited - in an e-mail box.  It is a site on the Internet that will sell streaming video, etc. 

Men - who are by nature sexual & many who have bad habits like watching M/F porn-fantasies --  see advertising like that on the left to represent a real threat.  How wide is the dividing line between fantasy & reality?  It is a fact that men who are raped by other men have an extremely low rate of reporting the act.  What man wants to be at a party & accidentally drink too much around a group of men who extol the title of "gay" in light of material like that on the left (& knowing what male sex drive is like).  How many parents would approve of their daughters passing out drunk around a bunch of drunk college Frat boys?  Do you understand the subconscious threat?

The image of the gay-pride event above is quite surreal.  Anyone watching has to ask themselves: "Is this what the gay-male community is all about?"  The same question rings true of the image on the left.  Critics may argue that there are lots of "nice gay people".  Perhaps.  But if you're locked in a cage with a bunch of snakes -- how many need to be venomous to make you prejudge them all?

Of course -- the primary act that the gay-male community holds up as their "defining sex" is actually a fetish involving a non-genital organ: AnalSex.  Seen by civilized society for thousands of years as a crime against nature -- the majority of people find the act repulsive and many societies have labeled it criminal. 

Despite the fact that research has shown that this act is the key for the explosive spread of sexually transmitted diseases (+4000% more frequently than all other forms of sexual contact combined), the gay male community has so defined itself (defined itself) in terms of this fetish that the media now routinely substitutes the term "gay-sex" when they mean "anal-sex".  Although practiced among mixed gender couples, -- it previously represented a mere minority of sexual contacts -- but is slowly gaining social acceptance because of the message for "tolerance" pushed by the gay community regarding "their sex act".  This gradual acceptance of what was once considered a form of moral decadence parallels (interestingly enough) the explosive spread of sexually transmitted diseases into Africa & Asia -- populations that often lack antibiotics & other medicines -because of poverty.  The result is a self-inflicted death toll unparalleled in human history - with an origin that can be clearly linked to the unrepentant "gay male" community & the explosion of pornography depicting "anal-sex" as an acceptable, pleasurable act.  It has been estimated that anal-sex is depicted in over +95% of gale-male pornography - especially obvious in "GAY" advertising of "gay-porn".  This is precisely the reason that "GAY-SEX" is used interchangeably with the term "ANAL-SEX"!  The bias is set so concretely in the public psyche that the prejudice generally goes unrecognized; --For the same reason that people think "BLACK US PERSON" when they hear the term "African American" -- despite the fact that African Americans can be of ANY COLOR and live in North, Central or South America!   

Because of human nature being what it is; -- Once people adopt a form of behavior as acceptable to their own consciences, they seldom change or modify it -- despite information that paints it in the actual negative light it deserves.  Instead, people tend to justify their behavior - rationalizing it.  This is why drunks keep driving & drug abusers keep abusing, - long after they've destroyed their own lives & negatively impacted all around them.  This is why the smoker keeps smoking despite the mountain of evidence as to where it leads & who it effects.  Once people's consciences have been hardened, our prison statistics show that they rarely change.   That fact is true of all behaviors -- even those not statutorily labeled as "crimes" -- even when they perhaps - should be.  Likewise, -few people ever take serious steps to clean up their sloppy thought patterns & correct their misuse of language -- even when those who have a skilled ear hear them as offensive, uneducated & vulgar.

The gay male community extols anal-sex as if the human body was built to accommodate the act (when it clearly was not).  The gay male community marginalizes the devastating effects of anal-sex as a conduit for pathogenesis.  Instead, they sloppily attempt to justify their vulgarity by claiming that many sexual activities can spread disease.  Such a half-assed-claim is like saying that, "Because many people get hit by lightning every year;  --Wearing a long metal pole on your head while playing golf during an electrical storm is of no real consequence..." - as if such perilous acts bear the same risks as those more benign! Consider this fact: If anal-sex was not acceptable in the "gay" community -- then STD's - like AIDS - that ravage it - would have never made a statistical dent!  In other words: It is the very act of anal-sex that made ALL of the "gay-plagues" happen!  But rather than weigh the EVIDENCE & embrace reason; -- The gay male community will continue to navigate the same course & criticize anyone who draws a distinction - as being "homophobic" (as if arse-sex & gender bending have anything to do with same gender affection anyhow)!
Unlike any other group I can think of: The prejudices & stereotypes that society has of the gay community are actively reinforced by the gay community itself! It's UNredeemable!

As I have noted before: I often hear from "GAY" men who claim that "Not all gay men are into analsex".  They're correct!  They also inform me that "Not all GAY MEN are into x-gender activity." Again: They are correct! Men who love men/too & who are not involved in anal-fetishes nor x-gender activity are called: G0YS! Among men who call themselves "GAY", -g0ys are far, far under 50%.  Although, when you cross-section the general male population, --g0ys are well OVER 50%!   Kinsey pegged it in 1948!


Color: It Comes in a Can:

And if you really want to piss off people who think their's is better than someone-else's (such as racists, & olde-Mormons, etc.); -Get the theology from the g0ys-website in front of their reading-glasses!  It'll wreck their entire decade -or so.

Studs 'n Hunks come in all colors and the same is true of decent & indecent people.  Skin-color like all other external traits is morally-neutral.  It truly adds variety -the spice of life.  If you went to the buffet & white-rice was the only dish, -I suspect you -like most people - would be  disappointed.

Race adds differences -from appearance - to innate behaviors resulting from nuances in brain-circuitry - also wired by genetics.  Like any trait: it simply just IS...

But I thought that it still may be necessary to add this subsection because there are people "out there" who assert that g0ys is some sort of shallow "prejudice club".  Well, we do "judge" ourselves, prospective members & those who stand against our core values.  However, -that discernment is not based on any mere "trait" like race or nationality.  Simply, -our hard-line-stance is based on behavior and we oppose those promoting philosophies that: maim, spread disease & kill.  And we're easily UNimpressed with people who aren't thoughtful enough to consider the results of their actions & the philosophies they promote. 

People are impressionable.  If you run off at the mouth & spew a mantra that convinces others to debase masculinity, men or humanity in general -by promoting perilous or harmful behavior/s; --Then you're no friend of anyone "g0y".  And we'll tell you so.  It should be clear in light of those principles that g0ys do not support the current state of the "GAY MALE PARADIGM", - whatsoever.

Some people assert that our posturing makes us a "hate" group.  Well, -I'd have to say that "HATE" may be under-rated if it's aimed at the irredeemable scoundrels & sick-tickets of society. No apology is offered for the fact that g0ys loudly exercise healthy discernment. 

But, -that guy I'm wrapped up with in bed who has an arm & leg across me as he sleeps soundly in my gentle half-hug ... THAT guy knows that I'd never do nor promote anything to hurt him or give him a disease.  If he got back late from overdoing it at a party, --he knows that he'll NOT wake up with a sore, blood-encrusted arsehole - nor discover a "mysterious STD" a month or so from now.  He knows that the color on the outside means nothing to me, --but I value greatly the shape of the man beneath the skin.  G0YS are all about character, friendship & respect of masculinity.  Love works no ill. And that's the hard-line we expect men to toe.

And most men know that it's morally-wrong to hurt other people in the name of pleasure.  And most men care ... except for sociopaths.


EDITORIAL CONTRIBUTION:

How I think and why I too say there are NO homosexuals, only people who think they are:
"Coming out” written by Siya Khumalo

As I mentioned in another post, I’ve been told to “come out” to my pastor, a rather wise, rather young man who probably knows everything anyway.
Come out as what? Human? In hindsight, the coming-out ritual is an unnecessary headache. Now, don’t misunderstand me – my pastor is a great man and I don’t pooh-pooh the therapeutic benefits of speaking to someone. But he is busy. What would his schedule be like if, for example, every man that masturbated decided to “come out” to him about it? He’d be swamped!
There are no homosexuals. There is homosexuality that exists to some degree or another in all people, just as there are no black people, only melanin manifesting itself in different concentrations in different skins. Categories overlap, mix and merge.
Another reason I think coming out is a mistake is that the male world short-changes men that come out as gay. It’s an ingenious and cruel trick; it would be unforgivable if it weren’t so unintentional.
You see, whenever I told guys I trusted that I was “gay”, I got support. But what I really desired was solidarity. I trusted those guys with my secret because I believed that on some level, they knew what it was like to be attracted to other men...
In hindsight, I was probably correct about the second part and incorrect about the first. They know what it’s like to find men attractive; of that I have very little doubt. But they can’t fit their minds around being “gay” and in fact, men have to be exposed to a lot of left-leaning, “tolerant”, “open-minded” ideas in order to sum the courage to say they’re gay if gay is everything they’ve been convinced that it is. In a sense, then, confessing that one is gay is like surrendering one’s manhood, a price too high to pay for a label.
“Gay” has been depicted as a whole new way of doing identity. The word “gay” has baggage, and there isn’t one human being in the world ready and able to embrace all of it. It’s not humanly possible. In this painful game of ill-fitting labels, “Gay” can’t just mean finding men attractive. The number of men who are attracted to men is so high that the word “gay” would lose all meaning.
Back to those men I’ve told about my attraction to men: it was kind of them to show me support, but support was less than solidarity. I can’t blame them; they cannot enter into solidarity with a man who says he is attracted to other men especially if he uses the term “gay”, or speaks about his same-sex attractions as though he’d thought about them very long and very hard. Because that’s precisely what gay men do; they think about their attractions. I believe that on some level, to have thought about one’s same-sex attractions subconsciously signals to the male listener that something is not quite right. You become “other”. Your mistake was not being attracted to men – you could get drunk with a friend, sate that desire and then pretend nothing happened one hollow weekend after another – but rather, in examining your desire for other men, and trying to find its meaning and implications. Bad, bad move.
When you come out as gay, the men you come out to will offer you support. Then, having offered you support, they stand back to watch you walk a path alone that you should be walking with most of them. Because there is a 63 – 68% chance that they know from first-hand experience what it’s like to like other men.
When I came out to them, I expected them to say, “You know, I once went through a phase where I felt like that” or something. To date, only three straight-identified guys have indicated that they’re rather “flexible” when it comes to sexual partner gender.
The most revolting thing in all this is that there is no way of knowing what I should be feeling when I receive support from a male friend I’m coming out to. Sometimes, I get that person’s support and then a niggling thought says, “He owes you more than support; he owes you self-disclosure. He invited you to be vulnerable; you were vulnerable; he should reciprocate.” My gratitude to that guy for supporting me is immediately tainted. I come to the realization that I cannot be friends with straight-identified men and they can feel that bitchy bitterness in me. It seeps, unbidden and unwanted, into my kindest actions and my most gracious words towards them. I am cut off from the world. I’m hoping to vent some of that darkness here.
The opposite also happens; a guy I come out to expresses support for me as an individual (few people will say, “Yeah, and I totally support your lifestyle too” – they normally just embrace the person) and, following my gut, I push the issue ever so gently.
“Aren’t you gay too, even a little bit –?” I caught you glancing at me that time like I’d taken your breath away. I am very perceptive. Nothing – not one nuance, not one thought – gets past me. I see it all.
You created a silent tension in your car that other time, as though you wanted something you did not have the words to articulate – something you’d gotten to experience with other men but, in the absence of non-gay homosexual terminology, you do not have the vocabulary to articulate. Please don’t tell me I’m all alone in this.
So I get asked, “Are you gay?”
I used to say I was.
I’m learning the power in saying I’m not.


These facts simply acknowledged for what they ARE -- because there was a social need & moral imperative for the formation of a group of men who were affectionate toward other men -- but completely repulsed by the imagery, stereotypes & stigmas promoted (-not only by mass media - but by the gay-male community itself).  To us, the "gay spectre" is so reprehensible & gilded in filth -- that something needed to be created as an alternative for the majority of men who genuinely love & respect masculinity (& reject acts that deride it).  Simultaneously -  recently developed apologetics needed to be made available to same-gender-attracted people who have been devastated by the widespread misreading of the Hebrew & Christian Scriptures.  As it turns out - those Scriptures NEVER condemned same-sex intimacy!  The SPECIFIC CONDEMNATION was against anal-sex all along!  Because of these giant issues affecting untold numbers of people ... G0YS.org was born.

"GAY" is a term that society sees as part of a "package deal".  It may have started out as a term that meant "same gender affection", but it has morphed into a thing that carries lots of social baggage in the wearing of it.  Each person determines for themselves if they want to don that term.  Since "g0ys" was coined -- many men who once applied the term "gay" to themselves (for lack of a better word) -- now say "g0y"; -- & as important: They have a resource they can point anyone to in order to understand the differences at: www.g0ys.org (spelled w. a zer0).  Never in history has such power been bestowed upon a single term so quickly & globally; -- A term that impacts many more men then the "gay community" could ever hope to influence.

- We are the g0ys.  Join us.