The reason this page title is true rests on the following facts:

Fact #1: Most "straight" men (especially those in modern countries) don't know what women in their natural state actually look like. Sound preposterous? Women are more aware of this fact & try desperately from an early age NOT to look like nature's template of a woman. Their entire paradigm of female appearance is based on a series of lies pushed for a long, long time by the likes of the cosmetic & epilation/depilation industries. And with the advent of computer image processing - these deceptive biases became reinforced even stronger.  The fact is that modern society so HATES the natural appearance of women that it is almost impossible to find images on the Internet that depict it. Even Google's Gemini AI does not know how to generate these images due to the complete lack of training data. And if you can find images that approach what NATURAL WOMEN look like, - the model is usually dressed in animal skins & is covered with grime (as if ancient people did not know how to bathe). How absolutely FUCKED UP are these biases?
You see, a "natural woman" looks a lot like a "natural man": Body hair (although generally lighter) is the biggest similarity. Differences are obvious: Women are generally shorter than men on average. They have a higher pitched voice, lack mature male genitalia, larger breasts & wider hips. While breast sizes & anatomy width can vary greatly; -Body hair is the most prominent tell when a woman is sexually mature (& yet, modern women go to great length to remove as much of it as possible). Following is what a popular GPT had to say about the subject:"

An Unnatural Beauty Standard: A Biological Perspective

Fact #2: Society's portrayal of women often reinforces a narrow and idealized standard of beauty that requires significant alteration of the natural female form. This alteration is achieved through a variety of grooming, makeup, and body-shaping practices that are heavily marketed to women. These practices not only shape the way women appear to others but also influence how they perceive themselves.

Hair: While hair is a natural biological feature, it is often subjected to a range of treatments designed to achieve a specific look. These treatments can include dyeing, straightening, curling, and removal. Hair removal, in particular, has become a pervasive practice in many cultures, with women often feeling pressure to remove hair from their legs, underarms, and other areas.

Body: The media frequently portrays women with thin, toned bodies. This ideal is often achieved through dieting, exercise, and sometimes cosmetic surgery such as breast augmentation. These practices can lead to unhealthy body image issues and negative health consequences. Additionally, the emphasis on a certain body type can overlook the natural appearances of women in general.

Facial Features: Women are often expected to conform to specific facial features, such as large eyes, full lips, and high cheekbones. Makeup is frequently used to enhance these features or create the illusion of having them. This can create a sense of dissatisfaction with natural features and can reinforce unrealistic beauty standards.

The Impact on Society: The societal pressure on women to conform to a narrow and idealized beauty standard can have far-reaching consequences. By altering their natural appearance, women are often creating a version of themselves that deviates significantly from their biological reality. This can lead to a distorted perception of female beauty, both among women themselves and especially among men. As a result, despite the age of media we live in, many men may, ironically,  never see what a natural woman looks like, leading to a skewed idea of what constitutes feminine beauty!

In conclusion, the societal pressure on women regarding acceptable aesthetics often reinforces a narrow and idealized standard of beauty that requires significant alteration of the natural female form. This alteration is achieved through a variety of grooming, makeup, and body-shaping practices. The general implementation of these practices produces a template-like stereotype about female beauty that deviates substantially from a woman's natural biological appearance. As a result, how a woman naturally appears biologically - is almost never represented in any media format, not even in nude photography! As a result of this extreme bias, many men never see what a natural woman ACTUALLY looks like! And this lack of accurate information gives men a skewed idea of what constitutes feminine beauty, often a notion that ironically rejects what women appear as naturally."

So, what do these facts about women have to do with child molesters?

Well, lets take another look at what modern society values in the appearance of a woman. Modern women esteem beauty as:

• Lack of body hair other than on the head.

• smooth younger looking skin

• higher pitched "feminine" voice.

And because breasts & genitals are usually covered with clothing in their epilated condition -  these make less of a statistical difference but still weigh in on the problem. The "problem"? Yes - because:
Fact #3: There is another group of people who naturally share the same physical characteristics that MODERN "STRAIGHT" MEN & WOMEN ESTEEM AS PART OF FEMALE SEXUAL ATTRACTIVENESS.

And that group is: Children.

• Lack of body hair other than on the head.

• smooth younger looking skin

• higher pitched voice.

Children also:

• are usually shorter,

• & lack mature genitalia

The similarities that children possess by nature are also esteemed by modern women (& the men who believe that what nature provided women is unsightly & thereby needs to be: shaved off, smoothed out & youthfulness exaggerated).

And many MEN, who have been MISeducated from infancy with the UNnatural, reimagined images defining what "attractive women look like" - discover as they enter puberty that children have many of these same traits as well. This "discovery" is not some verbal dialog that occurs in the frontal lobes of such men. This disastrous perceptual mingling of forged coincidences hits such men at a firmware, basal level - especially if their sexual cues were derived via pornographic imagery (that esteems & amplifies these faux-female biases loudly) - as they passed into puberty. 

If it was merely a higher brain function issue, then it could be "reasoned out of" - like a difficulty with certain math problems. But it's NOT an issue of the cerebrum; -but the cerebellum! These are the men who represent an indecent threat to children; -& the great tragedy is that such men are themselves the victims of a society that esteems lies. But how does society UNmake the monsters who possess such bad programming (-worse than any AI trained with a bad data set!)? With AI you need to wipe the memory & start from scratch with a better training data set. How do you do that with a man? This is especially problematic when such kinjite sexual proclivities grow into an entire system of commerce that reinforces the destructive fantasies surrounding the victimization of children. Did you see the movie "The Sound of Freedom"? These very real issues arise from a society that hates what natural women look like & attempts to morph them into an appearance that is, coincidentally, very similar to children! And then a subculture arises (child porn & trafficking) that esteems the sexual abuse of children. These issues are absolutely connected & driven by mass media in subtle ways that most people are completely oblivious to!  

Thousands of years ago, a great leader of a highly civilized group of people penned into law that: "You shall NOT be a false witness."! Now you know just how destructive being one can be. That same leader also wrote: "The woman shall not wear that which pertains to a manly-man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment". Violating this principle is possible outside the sphere of mere clothing. But the general idea is not to undergo activities that create question-marks around issues of gender. And violating these principles creates mixed messages & confuse children who are still developing sexually. 

So, a "straight" man who has been groomed his entire life via media & porn to esteem the false notion that women are beautiful due to hairless bodies, smooth hairless skin & high pitched (youthful) voices - have simultaneously been conditioned to find the "other" group who naturally bear these characteristics as potentially sexually attractive: Children!

G0YS are men who love masculine men & the effects of high-trait testosterone.

And this is why G0YS generally don't represent a sexual threat toward children. One Photographer helped illustrate it this way (see right):

A sexuality that strongly esteems masculine secondary sex characteristics such as body-hair, beards & stubble, toned musculature, a larger frame, deeper voice & sexually mature male genitalia capable of erection & ejaculation - is vastly different from a sexuality that has been catastrophically groomed to eroticize the faux juvenile traits promoted by media as being associated with desirable women!

As one g0y wrote: "As I entered puberty, the guys I became attracted to were the guys who were sprouting body hair, getting muscular & had a deeper voice that was actually being processed by the music centers of my brain as they'd speak (although I didn't know it at the time). I took up wrestling for 2 reasons: I had always enjoyed it and it now also made the perfect gateway to make close physical contact with athletic guys. By my senior year, over half of my friends were from other high-schools whom I had met at wrestling & gone out of my way to make friends with because they were extremely good looking. I was aware of the g0ys website and it had saved me (& other guys I had reason to show it to) from any number of nightmare inducing mistakes that might have occurred if I had drunk the rancid kool-aid being promoted my very 1st high-school semester by the sex-ed department regarding male, same-sex attractions. I barely passed the class and was labeled as "homo-phobic" by a guest lecturer because I loudly pointed out the CDC's statistics about anal-sex & the deadly perils around it. And after being called "homophobic", I recited the following poem (which got me 3 days suspension): "There is a pile of corpses - a hundred-million high, that stretches from hell through the mortal plane and scrapes against the sky. Corpses of men who bought the lie that said 'You will not Die!'. But, try to sway those who hate such facts? I'm not even gonna try. Asshole." (I don't think they appreciated my denouement's final term.). My brazen "infamy" was quickly transmuted into admiration by many of my peers. In my mind, I was simply a guy who happened to prefer the company of other guys who exhibited high-trait testosterone levels. I was blunt about my disgusts & made it clear that: "Anyone who gives or takes it up the ass is fuck'd in the head!". And exactly like the g0ys website explains when you say such things; - People presume that you're straight & don't like the gay community. The fact was that I was a 6 on the Kinsey scale & I didn't like the gay community. Being a jock for the duration of high school led to having about 11 friends who were good friends. None had any inhibitions about being touched by me - especially due to wrestling together & the fact that I'd started giving massages to guys early on when 1-on-1. Out of those guys, 5 got to the point where (by our Sr year) they'd get uncontrollable erections that threatened to rip the crotches out of their briefs when I'd get rubb'n on them while we were alone. It didn't take any convincing to get any of them overnight 1-on-1 with me and massage-cuddle each for hours in bed until the sexual tension would result in each piss'n a puddle of jizz into his shorts, sweats or the hand stroking his dick. And as the G0YS website suggests; -When you treat this activity a casual "guy thing" & not a ("gay thing" requiring sexuality assignment counseling), - then most guys relax into this added dimension of being "best friends" with a guy who doesn't mind giving full service to them instead of needing to fall back on the proverbial self-service pump themselves. Out of these 5 guys, all 5 "liked girls" too. The g0ys website did the job of explaining it all & I made sure to share it. Between stay-overs, camp-outs & long bus rides (to & from) away games (I lived in a big state)' - I very rarely ever had a day go by without emptying my nuts with another guy. Long weekends & vacations when I'd have one of them over (or more than 1 guy with visits split across the available holidays) - it was virtually non-stop nutting-sessions with lean, muscular, good look'n athletic guys who were closer than brothers with me. We'd often get to bed around midnight & be there till past noon the next day because in 12 hours we were probably getting only 6 hours of actual sleep. There's something to be said about peak testosterone & physical fitness. But it wasn't marathon jack-hammering sessions like you'd see in porn. It was marathon sessions of slow cuddling, kiss'n & caressing. I called it 'slow-mo sex" because I liked to take the slow naked tour of the other guys' body. Eventually, you'd both be so turned on that the gentlest move - even the feel of the other guy's abs pushing against yours while he breathed would be enough to push one of us past his control point & he'd surrender the spunk that had been brewing in his balls until the eruption was inevitable. Once one guy began to nutt it was a given that the other guy was gonna shoot sympathetically. And the flood of sensations you get as the guy you're wrapped up with is completely overwhelmed with the intensity as his muscular body tightens in your hug while his penis reaches peak engorgement & rhythmically vomits liquid pleasure - as the look of rapture seizes his facial expressions & his deep man-voice groans out deep, intense, ecstatic moans that replace all words (because words cannot express the moment)! And, simultaneously, he's experiencing the same sensations coming from you. That is the ultimate satiation for a guy who loves masculine men. Nobody in that bed was pretending to be with a woman nor wished he was. It's about raw, male sexual satiation where you revel in the musculature, body-hair, deep voice, hard dick, sweat, struggle & semen-soaking ejaculation-reflex of the virile, beautiful manimal writhing w. orgasmic reflex in your firm embrace. It's everything the "gay" male community dreams of having, but can't have (because they're too busy pretending that testosterone's effects are "toxic" while powdering their "manginas"). What a group of masculinity-loathing, miserable drama queens! What guy with a pair of balls wants to be part of that narcissistic group of female impersonators! So, any douchebag who wants to suggest that g0ys who love men are a danger to kids - needs to have a head examination; -Because what we find erotic, beautiful & worthy of bonding at the balls with is deeply seated in a set of primal masculine attributes - that happen to be the absolute opposite of the traits of a pre-pubescent person!"

As the "GLITQetc" mob becomes more gender-fucked; - they are a growing misinformation threat to youth!

At this juncture, the "WHY" behind this statement should be obvious: This is the group pushing for body modifications that destroy natural gender cues. Whether it's shaving all of the body hair off men or trying to fit male anatomy into clothes not designed for male anatomy - this group of twisted uselessness is the same "gay" sub-group that abuses street kids.

.