|
Who says the "AssFuck Act" uniquely
identifies the
"gay camp"?
... Almost Everyone ...
Even One of the biggest global customized
item printers!
Twice - over a 3 year period, the
image above was submitted to the same gigantic printer for production on
custom clothing.
The submission was denied by the
printer - on the grounds that it was "DISCRIMINATORY".
Not
"obscene".
"DISCRIMINATORY".
Not "adult".
"DISCRIMINATORY".
Not
"tasteless".
"DISCRIMINATORY".
It is a design that clearly is against the act of
 (as you can
see); --Yet is was deemed "discriminatory"
by the printer!
Well ... "WHO" was it allegedly "DISCRIMINATING"
against?
I think it's obvious who the "WHO"
is - that the printer said the design was being "discriminatory"
against.
And we found that decision
ASStonishing! Because, it reinforces what G0YS have been saying for over
a decade: "The term 'GAY' has come to be synonymous with 'AnalSex".
And in a bizarre coincidence - one of the largest mass-customization companies on
the planet happens to agree with 0ur ASSessment of the ArseFuck!
"GAY" = "AssFucker"
One of the biggest commercial custom-printers says so!
And THAT is the STIGMA that the GAY COMMUNITY
has been willingly ASSociated with.
And that STIGMA is the very ASSociation that
g0ys was formed to distance ourselves from!
G0YS have essentially rejected
the "A" in gAy. From observation &
personal experience, there are more g0ys, than gAys (read that statement a
few times) -- and many men who once thought
of themselves as 'gAy' are discovering the 'g0y' movement & flocking to it in
droves...because it's what they've been all along.
Read the
e-mail we get here & you'll see this is without debate. The fact
that many guys have their first sexual experience with another guy (almost always FROT;
--very rarely ever anal,)
is evidence to the fact that g0ys are all around us our entire lives (Because
if Jonny cuddled you till you came in junior-high, -- he's still able to
experience those same feelings today [pay no attention to the camouflage ...
eh, - the female, with him now]). It's just that social stigmas
against 'gAys' by coincidence, oppress 'g0ys' via those who may not yet be aware of the
distinction between men who are tender on men, vs. men who arse-fuck men.
Obtuse minds cannot see the distinction, but to those whom it applies, it's as
clear as empty space. If disease statistics are used as a measure of
morality, - then g0ys are among the most moral segment of the population,
while 'gAys' constitute the opposite. Therefore, the "A" in 'gAy'
also may mean: "Antagonistic" to life. For those offended by this
analysis, I suggest that you consult the CDC-table (right) & argue with it.
(Perhaps the figures
will change for your whims ;-) 0r N0T!
For
an excellent essay on:
What sex is:
[CLICK]
HIV
"Homofascism"
Butt fuck Tyranny
At least one American gay
publication, Magnus of
San Francisco, has recognized fascist tendencies within
contemporary gay activism. Writing in the April 2000 issue, AIDS
dissident Alex Russell sees similarities between the bonding
processes among HIV positive gay males and German Freikorps members:
Many attributes of the HIV Homofascist Movement (or HIVism) resemble
those of Fascism and the psychology of the Freikorpsmen: an
authoritarian personality; extreme emphasis on the masculine
principal, male dominance and blood brotherhood bonding; exclusive
membership of an elite in-group; and the fetishization and
aestheticization of suffering, self-sacrifice and death.
Freikorpsmen made war a way of life where desiring production
becomes death production. Many HIV Blood Brothers see the war on
AIDS as a way of death where the Freudian pleasure principle and the
death drive become indistinguishable. The Swastika armband has
now been replaced by the HIV positive tattoo and the red ribbon.
There is no loyalty without hatred: passionate membership to the HIV
Homofascist in-group can fuel hatred for the out-group (the
HIV-negative outsider or HIV non-existentialists) -- seeing AIDS
dissidents as a threat and obstacle to their blind HIV Belief.
- Michael
Phillip Wright
For years, discussions of
"homosexuality among animals" has been used by researchers to point
out that it is a natural phenomena in nature. It is indeed well
documented that many species have members that pair-bond with the same
sex. However, something else has also been recognized:
|
Indeed, some researchers, notably Tim Clutton-Brock of the
University of Cambridge, would say that "true"
homosexuality -- if strictly defined as male
by males who show no interest in females
-- is virtually unknown
among wild mammals. |
And here is the dirty little
secret that the Arse Clown Crowd would like to suppress. Just as the
religious right is proven to be composed of liars when they argue that
"homosexuality is contrary to nature" - in light of well researched
documentaries clearly showing otherwise; -- So are the "anything goes"
groups shown to be omitting keys facts when they try to justify
"homosexual"
by appealing to animal models! Lying voices on both sides?
It's what g0ys have been pointing out! The truth is indeed a narrow path!
Kills. Nature Knows.
Homophobia & Natural Selection:
Here's something to
consider: Homophobia is not as much a fear/hatred of men who love men, - but
is a result of natural selection wiring the brains of surviving offspring
against behavior that puts populations in peril -- such as anal-based
promiscuity, & female promiscuousness. This explains why male virility
is generally, - socially bolstered, butt loose women & passive/anal men are
loathed as 'sluts'. It's a double standard that is the result of many
generations of natural selection.
As covered above, a society that engages in widespread behavior that affects
reproduction adversely (& mortality rates affecting reproduction), will
be devastated by such behavior. Individuals in those populations who abstain
from those behaviors (& those that are so influenced to abstain)
survive to genetically pass their instinctive mental predispositions to their offspring. Over
several generations, these polarizations will influence society. I.E:
Many people dislike or don't care for lima beans. Seems an oddity, yes?
Since taste is subjective, why is it that lima beans seem to be disliked on a
much wider scale than say, corn? It turns out that lima beans
(especially white lima varieties) contain a substance that inhibits the
enzyme, amylase. Amylase is the enzyme used to digest carbohydrates.
In a society challenged by famine, interfering with digesting carbs could
literally mean the difference between life & death. Who would tend to
live? People who disliked foods that blocked digestion -- disliked foods
that inhibit amylase, -- would survive to have offspring more often than those
eating foods that inhibited digestion. Hence, over time, societies who
have histories of famine would tend to genetics that wired them to dislike
amylase inhibiting foods -- such as lima beans.
Likewise, people in general consider anal sex to be perverse, but religious
moirés do not account for this widespread perception (Religions tend to
distort the truth of such matters, being built on the primitive mind & using
myth to explain things. A genuine faith would be founded on the likes of
truth, understanding, & law ... but I digress.). Like a genetically
directed dislike of lima beans affecting large sections of society, a general
distaste for behaviors that tend to kill people & eliminate children would
naturally (used in the literal sense of the word) become integrated into
populations. Because natural selection is such a blunt tool, populations
tend not to understand the reasons 'why' they have certain cultural beliefs.
It's just a feeling prevalent in the society. The "A" in 'gAy' may as well
stand for "Anal" -- as society as a whole believes that & knows by instinct
that "Anal" sexual practices are invitations to cultural disaster (natural
selection itself has made the observation). It is this precise
mechanism that makes a new distinguishing alternative to "gAy" society
- a necessary
one:
'g0y'.
Harsh &/ Homophobic?
Some (very few) have
suggested that this website is too "hard" on 'gAy' men
or perhaps even homophobic. Being authored by mere men, it
is likely that there may be some imperfections of tone, -- & where it
fails to console the wounded, --we apologize without hesitation!
Yet I have to wonder how much of that alleged "hard-tone", is
the conscience of the critic echoing a subliminal "amen!"...
Being men who appreciate & even love other men, the
accusation of 'homophobic' is demonstratively without merit.
And, - a charge of being "homo[phobic/hating]" makes our point
for us about our critics' bias. See - we shun
& acts
that effeminize men. Anyone who claims we're "homo[negative]" because of our posturing, - is admitting that they
consider male to male intimacy to include
& effeminacy.
And because our posturing indicts them - they accuse
us of being 'homo[negative]'. So, our critics do the
best job of proving our point when they accuse us like
that; - & clue in anyone who is discerning - of that fact.
But what about being "too hard on gAy men"? Many men
who are 'g0y' - may have
previously identified themselves as "gAy"
(or "bi") -- for lack of more
appropriate terminology, -up until reading the content here. If you
read our mail,
you will see that this is the case more often than not.
These g0ys always indicate that "this" is how they "are" and
always have been. They often feel like they were alone in
their sexuality and did not fit into the 'gAy' culture.
Now they have discovered 'g0y', -- a better term to use.
Once they thought they were "gAy", (or 'bi') but
now they realize that they were 'g0y' all along!
So then, the "A" in 'gAy' -- as g0ys see it, -- never actually
applied to them ('gAys' who were 'g0ys' all along). You
see, if "gAy" ONLY meant being a guy who is into other guys, it
would be different. However, there are too many negative
stigmas attached to the term. How many people do you think would
"straight" identify if the media supported the notion that most
'straight' people were into
with multiple partners
ALL the time? How many people would wear a "straight"
label if the word was generally associated with filth, feces,
fetishes & disease -- as a rule of thumb? G0Y men
find the basic social-psyche surrounding the term 'gAy' to be
similarly distressing. I.E: Most emotionally healthy
adults love children & want to see them grow up happy, safe &
protected. However, despite the fact they LOVE CHILDREN,
few would choose the term "PEDOPHILE" to describe themselves, --
despite the fact that the term is technically accurate.
That term has likewise been destroyed by it's association with
child-molesters. After all, how many people who love music
& describe themselves as "AUDIO-PHILES" are accused of wanting
to "molest" home entertainment systems? The social use of
a word often produces a spectre in the mind's eye that has
little relationship to the actual, original meaning of the word.
So, are "we" too harsh on 'gAy'? One only need look at the
statistics
here to
see the obvious answer. The cultural differences between "gAy'
& 'g0y' are the differences between life and death, - but this
is no secret as the 'gay' community itself provides some of it's
own harshest
criticism:
Condemned by its own writings! A archived article in XY was written by a young guy observing the ambiguously-gay world
around him. I read it & realized that g0ys abound;
& what this young man was feeling was the shallow-pettiness of
the 'gay' lie that stinks like rotten arse. If we g0ys don't act, then the only thing
these awesome younger dudes are gonna find are the disease
ridden lies of a culture all diseased except for a few statistical
long-shots, & preprogrammed media mouth-pieces who can do
nothing but chant the mantra of a failed social experiment into
shallow thoughtless immorality done under the guise of 'liberation'
(perhaps like the Nazi's "liberated" Europe).
I for one love these younger dudes, - & many g0ys themselves
have kids whom they want to be comfortable to live a life more
open & honest, -- & without the stigmas associated with being
a "gAy".
If you could read some of the private feedback to this site! There
are lots of younger dudes in serious pain -- not because they
are hott for other guys ... but because they HATE (I MEAN
HATE PASSIONATELY) what mainstream "gAy" media portrays
men who love men as being all about. I get e-mail saying things
like: "Holy fuck! I'm so relieved that I'm not a
!
Been thinking about ways to end my life because I didn't know
how to deal with these feelings for my bro's without seem'n a
! Not any more - thanx!".
G0YS have some
suggestions! And "coming out" does not need to be one
of them (Especially if you're dependant on someone else -
like parents)! Why? Because people who 'come
out' discover they're among ''. If
you're "outed", make sure you come out fighting as a
g0y ... not an
. That'll shut the pie-holes of
the know-it-alls (& probably get you some major support from all
kinds of people -- some of whom are bound to be g0y)!
Homophobic? Nah
... we're men who luv men, head2toe.
Anti-gay? As 'gAy' culture is perceived to be:
-centric,
Petty,
Shallow, Selfish & GenderFuck'd: G0YS ABSOLUTELY detest it!
Butt, at the pinnacle of this open detest is the practice of
""; -- And whether done by M/M or M/F couples -- g0ys
abhor it. The good news is that it's so easy to stop that
particular practice! Ignorance does form a foundation for excuse
-- at least as far as the matter of "intent" is concerned.
However, once enlightened, the moral shape of the person becomes
self-evident. So, do g0ys have friends who are 'gAy'?
Sometimes... And we wish with all our fiber that they'd
get the "A" out of their thoughts for g00d...
|
Some "GAY"
men have asserted that g0ys need to stop being critical
of the excesses of the GAY community in order to foster
solidarity. Really? Ignore deadly & disease-spreading
behaviors in the name of "PRIDE"? According to the
DSM, people who claim to be immune from fault for
ego's sake are called NARCISSISTS! And based on the
clear historical evidence: SOCIOPATHS, IGNORAMUSES &
NARCISSISTS constitute a very large swatch of the GAY
community! fucktards! |
G0YS.ORG is a site
devoted to men who love men, but who want nothing to do with
or the
filthy (sh!t-stained), effeminizing stigmas
associated with it.
Many men who, for the lack of a better term,
once described themselves as "gAy", are now adopting the term "G0Y" (spelled
with a ZER0) as a better description of who they are & how they choose to
love other guys. Many guys who started into the gAy movement & were "recruited" by
the BPT ("Arse-Clowns") find our site to be a call back to their original erotic center.
Please do return! Above all: Please
spread the word that a new movement
(one that is ironically, very old) is taking place in male/male
relationships. 'G0YS' - We took the "A"
out of "gAy"
- denouncing the likes of:
Anal, AIDS,
& Apathy
- just to name a few!
We are the G0YS! Join us!
When
the term "GAY" was coined, --it originally meant "Same
Gender Attracted". G0YS have no problem with THAT simple
definition. However, -as time passed, the term "GAY" became
connected with cross-gender behaviors (which is why "intersexed"
& "transgender" ride in the gay-pride passenger seats) & perilous acts such as
.
In many places, the term "GAY-SEX" has come to equate
"". G0YS completely reject that notion and find the ASSociation repugnant to our innate morals. Please keep those
distinctions in mind whenever you read a G0Y commentary critical of
"The GAYS". It is not the original use of the term,
--but what it has morphed into, -that g0ys find reprehensible (& "reprehensible"
is perhaps, -too soft of a descriptor).
Hate truth?
"Here's a thought:
if LITERALLY and ACCURATELY describing what you advocate & condone
sounds like an INSULT, -maybe it's because you're advocating and
condoning irrational, immoral crap. The proper solution is not to
bitch at the people pointing that out. The proper solution is to
STOP advocating and condoning irrational, immoral crap." - Larken
Rose
|
I have also made the
observation that on the list of prohibited dietary animals
associated with the Law of Moses, -a substantial percentage consist of
animals that are coprophagous (in common terms, sh1t-eaters).
Under Hebrew law, contact with feces was 'tow-e'bah' (usually translated
as "unclean" or "abomination"). The same prohibition is true
regarding carrion (dead things). From observation, it seems more than mere
coincidence to me that Moses' Law forbade eating, (& often mere contact) -
with those things, -& creatures that had contact with those very things.
Among such were:
I find it amazing that an
ancient people (Jews) who knew next to nothing about microbiology would
have a law (Torah) that seemed to recognize the natural order of things & by doing
so - provided protection by prohibiting activity that would bring them
into peril from dangerous things that they had no knowledge of the workings! I believe
that God gave the Torah to Moses; -& it is the observations like this that
indicate a level of intelligence at work far beyond that of men living
4000+ years ago! Even from a symbolic perspective, the curse laid on
the Devil in Genesis relegated him & his "off-spring" to the existence of
being a death (by-product)-eater. "And Jehovah God said to the serpent,
Because you have done this, you -cursed above all beasts, and above every
animal of the field. You shall go on your belly, and you shall eat dust
all the days of your life." If you consider the general
description of the "curse", it covers a lot of "things" other than the
common symbology of a "snake". Virtually all of "biology's bottom-feeders"
come to mind - from germs to worms while almost always directly or
indirectly causative of the untold misery that plagues
the planet (from pestilences to parasitism). Coincidence? You say.
|
We Fukk'n Told 'Em
So!
Every so often - I hear from someone who visited
this website a while ago; -Scoffed at it, and now has a very perilous
medical condition (or 2+) they received while engaging in
(the
precise form of activity this site condemns loudly and without apology).
They return to apologize, -to tell us how right g0ys are ... etc, etc,
etc. They're usually shocked when I tell them to fuck-off & waste no
time becoming worm food. Why do I seem to be such a dick to the
dying? Because when you dig deeper - they always have the same story:
They spread their condition to others while they ridiculed &
denounced the "g0ys" movement along their way. Now, the reality of
their folly has set in as the grim-reaper takes swats at them, and they
come back wanting "absolution" from us. N0! Die quickly you murderous
fucking pus-bag of plague! May your life of working-ill and
self-absorption be a warning to others!
G0YS told you so!
NO ABSOLUTION.
Good Riddance.
G0YS have been accused
of "Bottom-Shaming". We find it offensive that someone would
suggest that g0ys shame bottoms more than tops! We have gone to
great lengths in our citations from the Centers for Disease Control,
World Health Organization & the American Red Cross to prove beyond any
shadow of a doubt that
is by far (+95%) the primary global vector for
sexually transmitted diseases and that those who promote the act are
morally reprehensible. We have gone to great lengths to prove that both
groups are equally fucked-up between the ears (the types who would
show toddlers how to chew a laundry-detergent pod). So, If you
have been under the impression that g0ys have targeted "bottoms" for
extra shaming, -please accept our sincere word that we have done
everything within our power to showcase TOPS & BOTTOMS equally as the
intellectually bankrupt, morally soft & masculinity-hating types that
they are. We hope this clears up any misunderstanding. |
|
With such a flock
of dirty-birds intermingling so comfortably with the "gay-male
community"; --they ultimately are responsible for the repulsive
stigmas that became connected with the term. "Gay" has "been
disgraced" by its own lack of moral discernment (evidenced by
an STI rate +4300% higher than the general population - according to
the American Red Cross). And the
gay-male community -which was originally about M2M sensuality; -Has
now been hijacked by chicks with dicks, dudes in drag & Adam with an
arse-fetish. Is this an exaggeration? |
|
Don't Like What G0YS Say?
"Congress
shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right
of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
-
1st Amendment Bill of Rights US Constitution
That's How Civilized Freedom Lovers Do! |
|
Attention Prudes:
This web contains explicit images/language (in order to illustrate adult
subject matter)!
|
"The fool believes his ways are
acceptable, but a wise man listens to advice.
Look carefully then - how you walk, not as unwise but as wise"
- Solomon |
According to Global, Multi-Organizational Medical Stats
(Extensively Detailed Below):
+95% of ALL STI's are spread via
AnalSex Vectors!
 [59.9 million–100 million] people have
become infected with HIV since the start of AIDS the epidemic. Roughly
50 million people have died from AIDS-related illnesses since the
start of the epidemic! Idiocy across several generations is the "gay
legacy". There's no fool like an old fool, & if you want to follow in
the steps of a bunch of old dead geezers who were so dumb that they tore
their own asses out & killed themselves w. diseases in record numbers, -
then don't expect sane people to applaud your idiocy as you follow the
fool parade! Be sure to learn how to "vogue"
- while wearing adult diapers (as a memorial to
-induced
incontinence).
In addition to causing
incontinence (yup),
AnalSex is +5000% more
perilous at spreading STI's than even oral! These figures are
derived from the CDC, W.H.O. & Red Cross.
Butt,
despite these deadly facts & the
fact that AnalSex is the #1 cause of anal-rectal injury - the GAY-MALE
community will continue on their wisdomless course of self-destruction;
-& attempt to portray anyone who cites these well established facts as
being "homophobic" or some other mindless slur that only a community
with its intellectual & moral head up it's collective arse will accept.
Most people are followers. Most people are
devoid of the ability to think critically. And most people - like
lemmings - will follow the "crowd" right over the edge of a cliff while
boasting about the very mindset that will kill them. Wisdom has been the
mental commodity that seems to be in perpetual short supply & this
website is not an attempt to call those without it to seek it. Fools
scoff at wisdom. It's in their nature - hence the death toll cited
above. So, you're either among the few who have been
diligently seeking "us" or you're among the many fools who'll continue
to play in shit & scoff. This website is offered to edify the
former & shame the latter. NO FUCK'N
APOLOGY! |
Captain Ahab had to have his whale. It only cost
him his life & the lives of those around him. Likewise, there are large
numbers of so-called "men" who declare themselves "gay",
who - "have got to have their TAIL"; -- Butt what they really
are --are the enemies of what the word "gay" originally
meant:
gay A.
1: bright and pleasant; promoting a feeling of cheer; "a cheery hello"; "a gay sunny room";
"a sunny smile" [syn: cheery, sunny]
2: full of or showing high-spirited merriment; "when hearts were young and gay"; "a poet
could not but be gay, in such a jocund company"- Wordsworth; "the jolly crowd at the
reunion"; "jolly old Saint Nick"; "a jovial old gentleman"; "have a merry Christmas";
"peals of merry laughter"; "a mirthful laugh" [syn: jocund, jolly, jovial, merry,
mirthful]
3: given to social pleasures often including dissipation; "led a gay Bohemian life"; "a gay
old rogue with an eye for the ladies"
4: brightly colored and showy; "girls decked out in brave new dresses"; "brave banners
flying"; "`braw' is a Scottish word"; "a dress a bit too gay for her years"; "birds
with gay plumage" [syn: brave, braw]
5: offering fun and gaiety; "a gala ball after the inauguration"; "a festive (or festal)
occasion"; "gay and exciting night life"; "a merry evening" [syn: gala, festal,
festive, merry]
|
Most people do not realize that the original definition
varies greatly from the modern use. Interestingly enough, this also
occurred with another term in Germany during the early half of the 20th
century. Let's take a look at another word whose image was forever
changed by those events:
Swastika N.
Swas"ti*ka\, Swastica \Swas"ti*ca\, n. [Also suastica, svastika, etc.] [Skr. svastika, fr. svasti walfare; su well + asti being.]
A symbol or ornament in the form of a Greek cross with the ends of the arms at right angles
all in the same direction, and each prolonged to the height of the parallel arm of the cross.
A great many modified forms exist, ogee and volute as well as rectilinear, while various
decorative designs, as Greek fret or meander, are derived from or closely associated with it.
The swastika is found in remains from the Bronze Age in various parts of Europe, esp. at
Hissarlik (Troy), and was in frequent use as late as the 10th century. It is found in ancient
Persia, in India, where both Jains and Buddhists used (or still use) it as religious symbol,
in China and Japan, and among Indian tribes of North, Central, and South America. It is
usually thought to be a charm, talisman, or religious token, esp. a sign of good luck or
benediction. Max Muller distinguished from the swastika, with arms prolonged to the right,
the suavastika, with arms prolonged to the left, but this distinction is not commonly
recognized. Other names for the swastika are fylfot and gammadion.
|
 How many people today think of "a charm, talisman, or religious token, esp.
a sign of good luck or benediction" - when they see a swastika?
Don't they usually think of images like the following, instead:
Now why do you suppose that would be? The
symbol
didn't kill anyone? No. It took a little tyrant from Austria and a
whole lot of powerful, image-laden PR (that exploited the formerly benign
swastika, among other things) to get people in-masse' to commit acts like
those shown above. Ironically ... Hitler didn't commit the atrocities shown.
People, - who mindlessly followed Hitler while he spoke great
swelling words, - committed these acts. People who were
willing to be led by propaganda are guilty of the holocaust.
And the swastika? -- An unredeemable image, - forever soiled by association
with human avarice. So negative are the images now associated with the
symbol that anyone visiting this page -- simply seeing the symbol displayed,
-- might mistakenly assume that this site is some sort of pro-Nazi web!
Well, this page is not about the swastika, but about
what can happen to a symbol or term over time - given enough bad press. This gets
me back to the opening definition: The word, is "GAY"... &
like the swastika, -- "GAY" no longer means what it originally
did. As a matter of fact, -- many people have been so stigmatized by the
"fallout" of the modern meaning surrounding, -- at least part, --the word's
association, -- that they visualize the following images:
"GAY" has, in many social circles, been made almost
synonymous with "DISEASE". And don't be naive to think
GRID/AIDS has been conquered. There are parts of the world where it rages,
without the benefits of money to buy drugs & slow it to a lingering crawl. When you consider the FACT that the
American Red Cross says that men who identify as "GAY" are a whopping +4300%
more likely to be harboring a serious sexually transmitted disease than the population
at large! Sholly huck'n fit!
Besides the fact that almost every "gay" fund raiser is about fighting
sexually transmitted diseases; --Let's take a look at the CDC's figures on AIDS infection (for
an example) in the
US for a clue (Last Updated 2016):
And remember, AIDS is merely (1) of a large number of sexually
transmitted diseases - many debilitating or deadly. However - the following makes our point regarding them
ALL.
|
AIDS Cases by Exposure Category
- United States:
"There is no amount of fact or truth that will sway the depraved
mind. The depraved mind revels in the excrement of lies." - D. Champion
 CDC collect HIV and AIDS data using common transmission
categories: [male-to-male sexual contact], [injection drug use], [male-to-male
sexual contact and injection drug use], [heterosexual contact],
transmission, and other (includes blood transfusions and unknown cause).
The distribution of the estimated number of AIDS diagnoses among adults and
adolescents in the United States, by transmission category, follows. A
breakdown by sex is provided where appropriate.
Notice that Female/Female (lesbianism) doesn't even
make the list! Apparently, it's fantastically SAFE to be a lesbian!
Why could this be? Could it be because Lesbians don't have dicks, &
don't
each other! Could be! (Interestingly
enough: Did you know that the
TeNaK/Old Testament has no prohibition against women who lay with women?
Neither does the New Testament - although people who can't read in
context think that Romans 1 does. It doesn't)! There's a reason for
the omission!
NOTE:
This chart shows AIDS cases (full-blown HIV infection). It does
NOT show mere HIV infections that have not yet proceeded to full-blown AIDS
(far more prevalent). This charts shows United States only. World wide
(+3rd world) HIV stats are MUCH WORSE on average. |
About AIDS: Above male/male sexual contact: 605555 cases! This number dwarfs ALL of the
others! When you factor in IV drug use w. related M2M sexual contact the
figure rises another 90494 cases to 198978!
But, is the phrase
"sexual contact"
accurate? Not really. Why?
Because there is a form of sexual contact particularly good at
spreading HIV. Ironically, it's also a major vector for AIDS spread by male-->female sexual contact. If you
want to spread diseases, & really let
them explode into society in epidemic proportions, - AnalSex
() is the
fetish that spreads plagues [+5000% better than even, oralsex]!
The gender
(M>M / M>F) of participants is
irrelevant. In the CDC chart above: 91070 cases of AIDS were
attributed to "HETEROsexual" contact. What you were not told is
the FORM
the "Heterosexual contact" took. People may
assume, because of the label "HETEROsexual", that it was penile/vaginal
sexual contact. This
ASSumption is unlikely for (2) reasons. 1) More
men are likely to use a condom in penile/vaginal sex to prevent pregnancy;
And, 2) contrary to misconception <pun>, the vagina is fairly hostile to HIV
taking hold, whereass the anus will welcome it readily!
Most
women infected by HIV became so by participating in
w.
a man, or
repeated unprotected vaginal sex with an infected man (who, statistically, almost
always contracted HIV via "gay"
or *IV drug use). The
playground acronym for AIDS: "Anally Injected Death Sentence" is
ironically, accurate! AIDS is seldom spread in other ways! AnalSex
accounts for +95% of ALL HIV transmission (as well as the majority of many,
many other sexually
transmitted infections)!
Today's lesson:
Merely being same-sex attracted - does not spread sexually transmitted
diseases.
But,
does
- far better than anything else by several magnitudes!
Based on the CDC & WHO advisories, -it
does so at least +5000% more often than the next statistical bullet;
-And proven by numbers acquired by the Red Cross which still has a ban on
"gay" blood donations because: Men who identify as "gay" are +4300% more
likely to be harboring a serious sexually transmitted disease than the
overall "Non-Gay" population (Reason: "Gay-men" are into
up to
their collective asses)! Like
the swastika, the word "GAY" has been devastated; -- Not by men who love men,
-butt by men who participate in the same form of sexual contact that male rape
takes; --
(NOT same-sex intimacy)
has been forbidden
by almost every civilized society from the Jews to the Greeks! Were
religious bans
simply due to religious prudes, or is there a serious fuck'n peril - that thoughtful
men of good conscience merely recognized for what it is!
(Yeah, GREEKS
-- the society to turn male/male love into an unparalleled art history lesson
- named
as of form of moral turpitude & OUTLAWED IT)!
|
 (No-Stigmas?)
The growing group, that
ASSerts
that anal-sex-play is "gAy", is perhaps better identified as the "Butt
Fuck Tyranny" ("BFT" in some circles).
We also refer to them as "ASS-CLOWNS"
(ARSE-CLOWNZ). It's not "gAy"
as much as it simply doesn't give a dAmn
about the recipient of this debasing form of pseudo-sex. Furthermore,
Ass-Clowns will stop at nothing to spread participation in this fetish
to the ends of the earth
<pun>.
The ad images shown are examples of mass e-mail marketing, - several
e-mails that a junk mail account set up specifically to monitor "gAy" e-mail
collects daily. Look & you'll see that every such
e-mail
promotes a single theme:
= "GAY".
Ass-Clowns will even
expend energy combating the simple truths this website shares with others!
The "ButtFuckTyranny" AKA: "Ass-Clowns" will call us "oppressive" because we point out that
is
indirectly killing people. Ass-Clowns will call us "homophobic",
despite the fact that we don't limit the message about the dangers of
to "gAy"
men. The Arse-Clowns will try to obfuscate & minimize
(see insert to the right) the dangers of
-- despite the fact that the figures on the chart above won't budge for them.
 Ass-Clowns talk about "condom education campaigns", but it becomes
obvious that after decades (yeah - fukk'n DECADES) into such campaigns that either the
campaigns do not work, or the fact that condoms
DO
fail (& that people don't always use them), - accounts for the figures on AIDS charted above! AIDS may be
the ultimate bane of the typical Ass-Clown, butt the fact is that
is a leading vector for virtually ALL
sexually transmitted diseases & at levels many times higher! This would
be like using your swimming pool to route sewage; -- Having regular swimming
parties, & then becoming angry at your guests for becoming critical or refusing to
attend! Ass-Clowns are not only immoral ... they are often willfully
evil.
The mental spectre created in the public mind by images like the ones shown above
are the reason why g0ys do not adopt the "gAy" persona, label & do
not want to be
ASSociated
with that culture[.] Because of Arse-Clownz & the damage it has done to
the reputation of same-sex relationships, -many people do not know to draw a
distinction between "gay" =
, - any more than the average person thinks
to separate the swastika from Hitler! As a result, g0ys have come to realize
that the term "gay" - in the mind of the vast majority of the public -
has
come to mean " PARTICIPANT". That stereotype may not be true for you,
but if you wear the uniform - people presume that you represent what the vast
majority of people who loudly wear the uniform assert. Therefore,
the term "gay", which originally, merely implied "same sex
attracted", -now carries with it a much broader set of implications.
G0YS
believe that the term "GAY" is unredeemable at this juncture; - Hence we reject it.
|
|
Seriously: Do the Fuck'n Math!
 Despite the repeated warnings about the perils of
on this
website, I am occasionally confronted with the excuse of some
condescending
ass-fucker who'll say something like: "Other forms of sexual contact can spread STD's
too...", -as some twisted reason why people should disregard the
extreme statistical differences between certain actions. These fucktards
are as intellectually dishonest as they are morally bankrupt.
Apparently that figure about
being "+5000% more perilous" cited from
the
CDC doesn't mean
much to a guy who's interests lie in
, the thread-count of
his 'good' sheets and powdering his 'mangina'. He's probably too
ignorant or callous to think about what numbers really mean (but
certainly not you, right?)!
For starts, you can listen to a very brief, but brutal summary of the
CDC's statement by clicking this chart:
The chart to the right models
STD infection rates based on CDC statistics & presumes a virtually
unlimited starting population with (1) infected individual at Year/0.
What should shock you is the fact a
logarithmic scale is needed to compare the contagion graphs!
This is because the contagion rate of
grows so explosively that a logarithmic chart was the only way to
illustrate that growth without completely burying the other (2)
comparisons! So remember that each vertical block represents a 10x
increase over the last & so on (on the logarithmic chart)! Mouse
over for a linear version. This chart says all!
In the summary, the CDC states that 0ral-sex can spread STIs like HIV
at a rate of 1 in 10,000 acts with an infected partner. Because it's a
statistic already based on probabilities, -we'll consider that number
the average minimum number of acts and let's also presume that a person
is pansexual and will have 0ral-sex on average once per day with
partners who are positive(+) with some serious STI like HIV:
10,000 acts at 1-per-day is 10,000 days. 10,000 divided
by 365 days per year is roughly: 27.5 YEARS.
Did you get that? 0ral-sex every day with different (+)partners and
you'll statistically get "something like HIV" once every 27.5 fucking years.
That's the figure for 0ral-sex.
| WTF-thought: Anyone
who is as promiscuous as the examples cited deserves to have
their dick explode. The STD's measured in these examples are
those of "HIV nature regarding their virulence".
There
are other life destroying STD's which are much easier spread and the increase
in peril applies to all forms of sexual contact. Did
you read that? Did it sink in? The
next plague that invades society may be easier to spread
than HIV.
Love, friendship, loyalty, safety & discretion: Those are
g0y ideals.
Don't
be slut. Being one will catch up to you. Govern
yourselves accordingly. |
Now, let's look at the spectre of
: The
PHYSICAL PERILS ASSIDE...
According to the same CDC report, -the risk of getting "something"
like HIV during
is 50 per 10,000 acts with an infected partner.
50x more perilous than 0ral-Sex!
10,000 divided by 50 = 1 in 200 acts. There
are
365-days in a year. At 1 act per day the perils associated with
,
are 50x higher than 0ral - meaning that you'll
statistically get "something" once every 6.5 months
doing
ass opposed to once every 27.5 years w. 0ral! Got your
fucking attention yet?
And if you don't see the difference between catching
"something serious like HIV" once
every 27.5 years as opposed to catching something every 6.5 MONTHS
(FUCKING MONTHS!) then your IQ must certainly be lower than a parsnip!
And because so many guys are dumber than a fucking parsnip - I'll
highlight the differences, anyhow.
Amazing fact: If you don't have a disease, you can't
spread it! Unless - something that doesn't cause a disease when in your
ass (but causes urinary tract infections if it gets into that place) is
present and
is that chosen act. YUP!
spreads
NSU
too!
The guy with a different dick in his mouth every day will go
(statistically), 27.5 years before he catches "something" like HIV.
This means that for 27.5 years he can't give anyone an STI because he is
clean himself.
The AssFucker, on the other hand is disease free for only
about 6.5 months. Depending on what he catches, -he may not know about
it for YEARS (such is the case with HIV). Here's where a mathematic principle called
"exponential progression" occurs and makes the situation much
worse for AssFuckers. You see, while the AssFucker is infected (yet unaware
of it) - he's still doing the
with other men. THEY will
catch/give something about every 6.5 months and in the space of 2 years, he will
manage to infect 3 to 4 of them with "something like HIV". They -
like him - will not know they are carriers for a long while which means that
they, being AssFuckers, will spread the contagion at the same rates. And those guys will repeat the cycle. So,
conservatively ... 1
infects 3 and they infect (3x3)=9 and they infect (3x9)=27 and they
infect (3x27)=54 and they infect (3x54)=162 and they infect (3x162)=486
and they infect (3x486)=1,458 and they infect (3x1,458)=4,374 and they
infect (3x4,374)=13,122...39,366...118,098...354,292...1,062,882 - all
in about 15 years ...1.5 million people! Look familiar? Remind you
of any historical epidemics? (Perhaps "something like AIDS")!
"Hey doc:
Do you have anything to stop this coff'n?"
The toll gets
even worse for AssFuckers! Think: Even if any one of the guys in this chain discovers the
fact he's infected, (& presuming that he can be "cured"); -He's
only going to stay disease-free for about 6.5 months until he catches
the next thing (And begins the fucking cycle all over again)! And the
guys who can't be "cured" because a cure doesn't exist ...
statistically they don't
stop
until they get so ill that they can't! And once every 6.5 MONTHS they make another victim.
This is the EXACT REASON WHY (TODAY) that men who identify themselves as "GAY"
are a whopping +4300% more likely to be harboring a serious STI than the
general public at large! It's not their sexual orientation that's the
cause. It's because they're predominantly ass-fuckers! BTW:
That statistic of +4300% is from the American Red Cross (which is why the
general ban on "gay" blood donations is still in effect).
Let's take a look back at the guys into blowing guys: One catches
something bad like HIV via oral, statistically once every 27.5 years. Let's
presume that it takes 2 years for the symptoms to show. What are
the odds that he'll give someone else the disease while he's a carrier:
The odds are 1 in 10,000 acts. In 2 years, he'll do 730 guys.
.0001x730=.073=7.3% chance he'll give (1) other person the same "thing"
before he knows there's a problem. Let's dig deeper. Let's
presume that whatever he has is curable. How long does he go until he's
infected again? Statistically: 27.5 years. Well, because people
age and don't go like rabbits sexually forever, -let's look at what really is
going to happen with real-risk over time. Let's presume a guy was 15
years old when he began his daily love affair with dicks. 15-years+27.5-years makes him
almost 43 years old when he gets his 1st HIV-like STD. How many 43 year-olds are
still doing a
different dick a day?
Risk drops with age because behaviors change. Even if he was a
sexual Olympian, he'd be (42.5+27.5)=70-years old before he statistically
gets his next HIV-like STI from 0ral-Sex.
How many 70 year-olds are doing a different dick a day? Even if he was a
sexual Olympian, he'd be (70+27.5)=98-years old before he statistically
gets his next HIV-like STI from 0ral-Sex. How many 98 year-olds ...
Compare that with the guys doing
. They'll be spreading STIs throughout their sexually-active adulthood at a rate of 2-3 per year
with years sometime passing before an infected guy even knows he's been
infecting others!
Even if an AssFucker's dick falls off him, he would
have been a very measurable, active force of disease-spreading over the
same time that the guys doing OralSex got/spread NOTHING! Ass-Fuckers destroy entire civilizations with STDs.
History has .. and still IS ... proving this ASSertion true -even now.
But: What happens if the guy into Oral ONLY does other guys who steer
clear of
too? The numbers get vastly better because the starting
statistic was 1 in 10,000 acts with an INFECTED partner. When
Oral steers clear of ass-fuckers he avoids the great
river of disease. Seriously! Do the fucking math:
Oral-Sex - reduced to an annual risk figure, 1 in 10,000 is a 3.6%
annual risk that you'll get something at one fellatio-session per day
with an infected partner/s. Avoid the partner/s who are
likely to be infected (omit OralSex with AssFuckers) and that
infection rate further plummets!
However,
- at an annual risk figure, 1 in 200 acts = 182%
contagion (365
acts per year) risk!
You're a winner, - eh - I mean ... LOSER almost 2x-over every single year!
Consistent, meticulous condom-use reduces this risk to 1 in about 2500
(which is still 400% WORSE than the guys doing unprotected 0ralSex with
infected partners)! And remember that condoms have a 14% failure
rate.
is like playing Russian Roulette with
all chambers full - butt one.
And these are a few of the reasons (not all) why g0ys are so negative
about
. Men who love men don't take risks that spread
diseases explosively and hurt (or kill) other men. Sociopaths do that
shit! Which brings us to the next topic - below. |
"For
by your words you will be justified; -& by your words you will be
condemned."
- Rabbi Yeshua
Ben Adam
 The
following
is an excerpt from a book written by a +70 YO, well known "gay
activist" - now DEAD / HIV+
This excerpt is included because the old Ass-Fucker articulates
precisely what g0ys have been saying about those who promote
: They're
complicit to murder.
Famous
"GAY" Activist's
Confession of the 'Anally
Injected Death Sentence':
"Does
it occur to you that we brought this plague of AIDS upon ourselves? I know I am
getting into dangerous waters here but it is time. With the cabal
breathing even more murderously down our backs it is time. And you
are still
. You are still murdering each other. Please
stop with all the generalizations and avoidance excuses gays have
used since the beginning to ditch this responsibility for this fact.
From the very first moment we were told in 1981 that the suspected cause was a virus, gay men
have refused to accept our responsibility for choosing not to listen, and, starting in 1984,
when we
were told it definitely was a virus,
this behavior turned
murderous. Make whatever excuses you can to carry on living in your state of denial but
this is the
fact of the matter. I wish we could understand and take some responsibility for the fact that
for some 30 years we
have been murdering each other with great facility and that down
deep inside of us, we knew what we were doing. Don't tell me you have never had
without thinking down deep that there was more involved in
what you were doing than just maintaining a hard-on. I have recently
gone through my diaries of the worst of the plague years. I saw day
after day a notation of another friend's death. I listed all the
ones I'd
with. There were a couple hundred. Was it my sperm
that killed them, that did the trick? It is no longer possible for
me to avoid this question of myself. Have you ever wondered how many men you
killed? I know I murdered some of them. I just know. You
know how you sometimes know things? I know. Several hundred over
a bunch of years, I have to have murdered some of them, planting in
him the original seed.
"
-
Larry Kramer
Kramer
(inadvertently) makes it quite clear that the "GAY" community has
been (& continues to be) its own worst enemy by promoting &
performing the ass-fuck! It's called 'callous-disregard' & it's
literally a criminal mindset. This is why G0YS completely reject
association with GLITQetc!
Gabe Kruks, a director of public
policy and planning for the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Services
Center, is quoted on the subject: "boys and straight girls who are
having sex for money, shelter, love - they are at risk. And the gay and
lesbian community (and I particularly fault gay men here)
- has done nothing to try to help our youth. Gay men view these boys as
recreational toys to be used. I have heard many stories of HIV-positive
men having unprotected
with boys. They don’t think it matters."
It's because the "gay-male community" is awash
with sociopaths.
|
Soft
Personalities:
 In psychology,
people are sometimes classified based on their willingness to accept a
suggestion. In the minds of susceptible people, a slogan repeated enough
times is taken as truth: "The earth is flat", etc. Lacking
either the willingness or faculty to question blanket statements about
reality, these people
live in a fantasy world made of gossip, myth & half truth; -- And they cannot
understand why the people around them succumb to the likes of HIV. Mix
in some arrogance & a promiscuous mindset & these people have the same effect
on society as a plague-infected rat - that lives in the kitchen
among the buffet setup.
Every now and then, an e-mail arrives from the likes of these to scold G0YS on
our posturing, & extol the so-called 'virtues' of the forms of sexual fetishes
we detest. Often, bold statements are made asserting how some group in
the distant past put the likes of
on a social pedestal.
Indeed, there have been groups in history who built monuments to such fetishes
-- right before their proclivities wiped them out (a premise being
proven in Africa at this very moment). See, 'soft' personalities
can't form the essential thoughts to question their preposterous asertions.
I.E: What happens to the society that lacks antibiotics, - that also engages
in activities that easily spread the likes of syphilis, gonorrhea &
other STD's? Ask any gay guy who's over 49 where most of his adolescent
'friends' who came out as "gay" after Stonewall are now. Ask those still
alive why they didn't become HIV+ too (the answers will all have
1-thing in common: "ASS-CLOWNS" DROP LIKE FLIES FROM DISEASES that those who
DON'T
DON'T GET.) Hmmmm.
 The "GAY" male community preaches the pro- message:
GAY guys play in SH!T and
. GAYS are pushing the
stereotype. GAYS ARE PUSHING IT! Who? Gays are! Would it be the GAYS? Yes!
It is!
And society has believed their message & occasionally speaks out against it
in no uncertain terms. Notice how the public protest in Latvia in the
following image has welded the spectre of
with the term
"Homosexuality is immoral". But where do you suppose that these Latvians got
the notion that
=Gay?
Could it be the bulk of "gay media"?
The answer is obvious!
It's a prime example of people failing to isolate the various components
of an argument. G0YS rearticulate the argument by saying: " ir amorala". And if Latvia (& the entire globe) would like to outlaw
- even classify it as a capital crime, - G0YS are completely OK with
that -as long as such laws are enforced equally on both genders.
Killing
the messenger?
(It's
a gay thing...)
 Organized
gay empowerment movements emerged during the 1960s and 1970s in major cities
in the USA and Europe. These movements coincided with the heterosexual
revolution in most Western countries that were more accepting of greater
sexual freedom. However, the sexual revolution and gay empowerment movements
also coincided with the introduction of HIV into several gay populations
during the 1970s. The development of gay bathhouses where sex contact with
many different partners during a single visit was routine created a perfect
setting for transmission of sexually transmitted infections. Once HIV was
introduced into such a venue, explosive spread occurred. With increasing
global mobility (jet travel) that became increasingly available during the
1970s, HIV-infected MSM from major cities such as SF, NY, and London rapidly
spread HIV to MSM networks in most other major cities throughout the world
during the 1980s. By far, one of the worst affected MSM populations has been
and continues to be among MSM in San Francisco. The picture of the SF Gay
Men’s Chorus was taken in 1993 - those dressed in black, with their backs
turned, represent those who had died. Today, all their backs would be turned
because the obituary list is now 47 names longer than the chorus roster. As of
mid-2006, only four men are left from the original 1978 Chorus of about 200
members.
SF
Chronicle file photo by Eric Muse
 
And these untimely deaths are the mere tip of the
gay-AnalCentric-porn iceberg of death & destruction.
 Unfair
Stigma?
Basis of Communication 101:
If you want the
world to stop calling you berating names - then stop calling
yourself by the same names: "We're here; -We're "Queer"
<What was that?>;
Get use to it!"
OK. We're used to it. You made your point. You're Queer.
Your words.
 We constantly
hear from guys who claim to be "gay". They tell us that not
ALL "gAy"
men are into
. We don't deny it. The problem is (pay close attention):
That the GAY community in general
ASSerts
that " is the GAY-WAY". Just like the
principle above: If you want society to drop an offensive
stereotype - then you'd probably be well suited to reject it
first. And "REJECTING
IT"
doesn't mean "TOLERATING IT". It means "REJECTING
IT".
Having spent
lots of time in the guys' locker room; - I'll confirm that
when guys are berating "FAGS"
... what they're really talking about are the social
stereotypes (psychological baggage) that the term "GAY"
WILLFULLY CARRIES. And the most
offensive stigma the term WILLFULLY CARRIES is
an
ASSociation
with the same form of assault that male rape takes:
.
And the overall picture that the term "GAY" promotes from
within it's own ranks - is viewed by the majority of
men to be a willful debasement of masculinity. And
WHO
is it sending these messages in the loudest possible formats?
It's the
GAY-male
community itself!
Pay
close attention: If you want the world to cease
associating your group with berating imagery; -then stop
portraying yourselves with that imagery.
And, of course,
the gay-male community won't speak out against
self-deprecating imagery (right), -because in the name of
"tolerance", the gay-community has created a safe-haven for
morally-soft people who promote their deviance as
an "evolving cultural standard of behavior". In legal
terminology - this is called "being complicit". It is the
bedfellow of cowardice & deserving of the shame it has
embraced. The folly is obvious - as that same "culture of
tolerating anything" has the highest levels of sexually
transmitted diseases of any demographic on the planet!
What other culture would tolerate a subculture within its
ranks called "Bug
Chasers"?
The "STIGMA" of
"GAY" is well deserved because "GAY" embraces it's own
demise by "TOLERATING" virtually every decadent act that
"gay" people dream up. Anyone who dissents is labeled
"intolerant". If this was simply the opinion
& assertion of g0ys, it would be merely a prejudice.
However, anyone who has spent time moderating any of the
g0ys group forums know that we receive an astonishingly
large amount of "gay-centric" e-mails/messages that
themselves push the very decadent " stereotypes" that
have been mentioned here. We regularly receive scathing
messages from pro-gay supporters that flame g0ys for our
utter rejection of
& other acts that we see as
dangerous, demeaning & damn-unmasculine. These
"pro-gay messengers" continue to confirm that it is the
gay-male community itself that is responsible for pushing an
agenda of disrespect, disease & death. If that's what
"gay" asserts that "gay is", then so be it. That's them;
--Not US!
G0YS
ARE PROUDLY INTOLERANT of the
-PARADIGM
& MASCULINITY-DEBASING, MORAL-DECADENCE extolled from within
the GAY MALE COMMUNITY. G0YS are SO INTOLERANT, that we have
segregated ourselves by adopting the DISTINCT TERM "G0Y"
(spelled with a zer0) that is precisely defined from its
0RIGIN, - & not subject to definition-decay as any slang
term [IE: "GAY"] (that comes to mean whatever time &
implication might want to eventually
ASSert).
|
 The
lie (left) - a supposed depiction of men who luv men,& the stigma it
creates - is offensive to g0ys, & the basis for the majority of
society's prejudice against M2M relationships. G0YS
denounce such stereotypes without apology! Whoever creates
such advertising does not love men; -- Quite the contrary.
Notice the
text at the bottom of the ad that reads: "DECEPTION
IS THE KEY".
Then notice the text at the top that implies that this is
his FIRST GAY SEX.
Notice the color images. This is what the Butt
fuck
Tyranny promotes as "gAy". Society, in general, believes
it.
Zyclon B
anyone?
It's their own Message!
Their Message!
  "Truth
in advertising" at the 'Pride Parade' in San Francisco.
It's their own Message!
Their Message!
"Here's
a thought: If LITERALLY and ACCURATELY describing what you
advocate and condone sounds like an INSULT, maybe it's because
you're advocating and condoning irrational, immoral crap. The
proper solution is not to bitch at the people pointing that out.
The proper solution is to STOP advocating and condoning
irrational, immoral crap." - Larken Rose
Why
Be Nice?
 In continues to ASSTONISH
me that some people seem the think that g0ys should be "nice" to
people who push, support & silently-tolerate this sort of vulgar abuse
of humanity.
Damage, disease & death have always been the criteria for criminalizing an
activity. So, (ergo), -by it's very nature,
is a CRIMINAL
act.
"Adults consenting" to engage in a criminal act are
criminals!
The act of
has made it clear that the public always pays the
price for "private criminal behavior". That's why, when an
'r
tears his arse out or gets an STD while "privately consenting",
-that the health & life insurance rates rise for the PUBLIC (looks
like something wasn't so 'private' after all).
When it's immoral: What starts out as private behind closed doors, -becomes
public knowledge on the hospital floors.
G0YS have made a quality decision not to coddle such vulgar, criminal
mindsets! G0YS don't do it! We don't tolerate it quietly! (Because if
you do tolerate such foolishness, -history teaches us that some people will
begin to believe it's OK & actually promote the practice! Hello? Sound
like any "group" you can think of?)
Not all gAys
. True. But calling yourself "gAy" makes
you guilty by association with the culture that has framed itself with
criminal practices & routinely perverts public policy to allow what
should be outlawed! If "gAys" need to defend
as
"gAy-sex", then "gAy" is a movement with criminals as
its spokesmen. Supporting criminals is a crime called "aiding
& abetting"! That's "gAy"!
G0Y isn't "gAy-light".
G0Y is about men of good conscience who call
what it is &
don't tolerate the amoral rhetoric from those who disguise callous
indifference as "tolerating diversity". WTF!
|
| Thousands of years of
innate social conditioning in many cultures often welds the
impressions imposed with predominant traits -to an entire family.
Many people have been exposed to the concept of bringing pride or
shame upon "the family name". It is a well understood &
accepted principle -especially in Asian cultures. However, the
gay-male community seems oblivious to the principle. They don't
understand that "tolerating everyone" brings within their numbers
those who live in such ways as straining tolerance, - many unworthy
of it because of the results (say "results") of their actions &
philosophy's. And these individuals also call themselves
"gay". If my last name was "Hitler", -I'd change it.
Because, you see - some Nazi named "Adolph" disgraced the Hitler
name during the early 1900's. "Gays" don't seem to understand
this well established social principle, -& so they mindlessly
tolerate every destructive fetish that knocks on the "gay-door"
(simply because there is a gender-nonconformity perceived in it)! We
need no longer coddle such willful ignorance. We think; --Therefore
we reject "gay" as a self-identifier. We are the G0YS! |
|
They'll Never
"get it"
(Because they choose not to)
Malik states in his paper: Born
Eunuchs:
Suetonius said of the
emperor Titus that "he was suspected of excess; and likewise of lust
because of his crowds of catamites (kept
boys) and eunuchs."
Apuleius, in the
picaresque novel The Golden Ass, tells of a band of "half-men" [semiviri],
who call each other "girls" [puellae] and have sex with young men,
both as active and as passive partners (tops/bottoms).
They also act as cultic priests of the Mother Goddess, a traditional
role for eunuchs.
The next piece of evidence
is a bit more complex. It consists of some comments by Clement of Alexandria
about the followers of Basilides, a Christian Gnostic (cult). Clement said they
lived "lewder lives than the most uncontrolled heathen."
It was that sort of behavior & those
abuses against people that Rabbi Saul/Paul was highlighting when he
penned this - recorded in Romans
chapter 1:
" And just as they
did not think it was worthwhile to be having
[or, keeping]
God in [their]
true knowledge [or,
consciousness], God gave them over to a
reprobate [fig., debased]
mind to be doing the [things]
not proper, -having been filled with all unrighteousness, sexual sin,
wickedness, covetous desire
[or, greed], malice; full of envy, murder,
bitter conflict, deceit [or,
treachery], maliciousness; gossips,
back-biters, God-haters, insolent persons, arrogant boasters, schemers
of evil [things],
disobedient to parents, foolish, untrustworthy, without natural
affection, unforgiving, unmerciful; -Who having
known the righteous judgment of God, that the fate of those who do these
things is death, not only are doing them, but they are also approving
of the ones practicing
[them]."
- Rom
1:28-32 (How's
your insight coming?) [S/P]aul
Now - most members of the
Club will
immediately raise an objection to the above quote because it mentions God
("is religious"). They raise this objection because they
cannot raise a valid argument against the actual substance of the
passage as it: Describes accurately those who are a law unto
themselves being without a conscience. And, that is the
condition of the
club: Sociopaths!
"And, according as they did not approve of having God in
knowledge".
Καὶ καθὼς οὐκ ἐδοκίμασαν τὸν
Θεὸν ἔχειν ἐν ἐπιγνώσει
And, because the first part is
a bull's-eye; - So is that which follows. Which, is why g0ys.org is
N0T
an emotional appeal for those people to come to their senses. We consider
them a causality of their own indifference. G0YS.org is an appeal to
help stop those currently on the journey there - because of their
keeping of bad company. We're also an alternative viewpoint to the
"package deal" that is immediately often ASSumed to be part of the
moral constitution of anyone who wears the "gay label".
In the general view of
society, - calling yourself "gay man" is like stepping in dog-shit. There
may be a shoe - between it & you, - but when the air settles down -a smell
lingers 'round. It's the stale odor of something rotten (as
described in the opening box quote).
Need evidence?
It's not the fact there's same
gender attraction. G0YS have no problem with that.
Neither does the Bible! +60% of the population
experiences SGA. The problem is the fact that the gay male culture has
welded the icon of
into such close proximity with the term "gay"
that we do not think it is feasible to try to redeem the term.
Metaphysically: GAY is to
, what SWASTIKA is to NAZI. We are
fully aware that there are men who currently identify as "gAy" - who reject
.
They're called "g0ys" these days. It's a word for far better
classification. Because any "gay guy" who
explains (over & over & over) that he's not "into
" - is like a
man who whistles during a hurricane: Nobody hears & those in the event
don't take the time to listen. On the other hand, g0ys - by our posturing
against
& gender-fukk, generate an emotional response so fast among those who
hear the description - that the boundary sets like psychological concrete.
Lots of men who can't the stand the stench around the term "gAy", readily
gravitate to the term "g0y".
Need evidence?
And the growing "tolerance
movement" that accepts "everything gay & male"? That is described in the
last sentence of the quote that this box
opens with. ("gay" affirming churches - you too). G0YS aren't
against SGA. We're against acts that lead to death/disease/demise (such
as
).
It's not a matter of "a little
distaste". We think
comprises a legal-tort against humanity. It is
immoral because it spreads disease like the plague. We appeal to 3000+
years of legal history on the matter. Them? You?
|
"If you've ever loved another guy - the last thing
you'd want to do is anything that would hurt him. This is the aspect of
the g0ys movement that makes it so common-sense. By denouncing
,
the g0ys movement rejects the single most perilous fetish ever know to
man & kicks to the curb a culture of disrespect & disease that is
responsible for +98% of the injuries & deaths that has plagued the "Gay
Male community" since Stonewall!
G0YS offer no additional apology! Willful ignorance deserves no
respect!" - G0YS.ORG
|
Isn't it Romantic?
- N0T!
