Final Reminder: This site contains explicit images & language (in order to illustrate adult subject matter)!

 Not "homo-sex" (Notice the top set of images are all men with women)!

"Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones." - Romans 1

In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another.
Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received WITHIN themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

And HOW did they "Receive the penalty WITHIN themselves"?
Hint: According to the CDC, AnalSex is +5000% more perilous for spreading diseases than even OralSex!

AnalSex! How can we be sure?
Because the Old Testament has no law whatsoever against female/female physical intimacy!
And the only prohibition on male/male intimacy is in the case of man laying with mankind
AS WITH a woman.
And that word "
AS" has a very specific legal meaning within the original Hebrew that the commandment was written in!

Have you ever noticed that when most religious people want to talk about adult subject matter that they want to discuss it without discussing it!

"One of my teachers at yeshiva decided to introduce me to his Rabbi – who was one of the big godol’um in Jerusalem; --someone who’s regarded worldwide as a po’se.

When he talked about the specific prohibition in Torah, -you know: against anal-sex; -& wanted to make that very clear to me.
And when I told him that I did understand that, & that "
I did NOT have anal-sex."
He was a little perplexed & said “
Then what is the problem? So you don’t have sex with men.”.
I said, "Well,
I do; -but we don’t do that.".

This is a godol, -learned in Torah – learned in so many worldly facts as well; -but he suddenly was at a loss. Anal-sex was gay-sex as far as he knew."

In the white-box above, -the omission of a parallel commandment condemning women who lay with woman -  is NOT a mistake. This is because the commandment is one that forbids a very specific act and women are not named because women lack the anatomy to commit the forbidden act of AnalSex with another woman!  This is why the phrase "AS he lays with a woman" "מִ שְׁ כְּ בֵ י" are in the commandments covered above from Leviticus.  It comes from the Hebrew root כְּ "Kaf"  (expanded: Kaf-Yod) pronounced "key" - which carries the meaning of "AS/LIKE".  A man who lays with another man AS (in like fashion - penetration) a woman - describes the act of PENETRATION because THAT is what the phrase "lies with a woman" means in the legal sense within the Torah. And for those who think Paul covered the "lesbian-ground" in the New Testament (Romans); - Your theology sucketh.  Paul himself (a Hebrew lawyer) was very specific that he would NOT go beyond the letter of the written Torah! "Brothers, I have applied all this to Apollos and myself for your benefit, so that you may learn from us the reasons why not to go beyond what the Scriptures say. Then you will NOT have PRIDE about one person at the expense of another." -I Cor 4:6 Paul.  If the Old Testament law didn't forbid a thing - neither did Paul teach against it in the New. Duh!  So, when you get to Romans 1:27 where the Apostle-Paul (a Hebrew lawyer) pens the same word (in Greek) translated as "LIKEWISE" - he is connecting PRECISELY the nature of the violation to the commandment in the Torah with the very LETTER ( כְּ )AnalSex, NOT "Homo-Sex" is the forbidden act in Leviticus 20:13! The distinction makes a massive theological difference!

By the time you've been through this site & visited some others, we hope that your thinking will be so different that you'll have genuine peace of mind & know that the loud booming voices from the religio/political left & right are those of blind leaders - leading the blind.  It's also hoped that you'll become involved with spreading the truth!  This can literally save lives, & build real self-esteem. 

2nd Proof:

It's also interesting to note that Hebrew tradition strongly considered human excrement as "unclean" ("to'ebah" to come into contact with).  It literally is the same word as translated "abomination".  A fascinating look into this matter can be found in the book of Ezekiel where God was instructing the prophet on how to conduct his life in the open as a testimony AGAINST Israel's rebelliousness.  This is what the text says (& I will use color to highlight passages germane to my point):

Eze 4:12 Use dried human waste to start a fire, then bake the bread on the coals where everyone can watch you.

Eze 4:13 When I scatter the people of Israel among the nations, they will also have to eat food that is unclean, just as you must do.

Eze 4:14 I said, "LORD God, please don't make me do that! Never in my life have I eaten food that would make me unacceptable to you. I've never eaten anything that died a natural death or was killed by a wild animal or that you said was unclean."

Eze 4:15 The LORD replied, "Instead of human waste, I will let you bake your bread on a fire made from cow manure.

There is a massive lesson here.  First, Ezekiel was extremely distressed because as his mission as a prophet, he had been instructed by God to use dried human waste as a fire source to prepare his food over.  He objected & God respected that objection by letting him use cow manure instead.  (Yes, that is a fuel source in many parts of the world). 

From the text - we can conclude the following:

  • Today we know that FIRE would have sterilized the human dung - killing all microorganisms - in addition to snapping the very molecules to constitute the waste by the process of super-oxidation .  Ezekiel knew nothing about such matters. What he knew was a commandment forbidding contact with human dung existed. Because of his weak conscience on the matter, God made a provision for a substitute (which parallels what Saul/Paul taught about weak consciences. See I Cor 8:7 ).  Seamless continuity.

  • Glaringly obvious however is the general belief that human waste was viewed with extreme contempt.

So then:

  • Anal sex (Male/Female or Male/Male) was undoubtedly viewed as an "abominable" practice (as it involves direct contact with human feces).

  • This belief is in harmony with Romans 1, & the sections of the Law of Moses that condemn men laying with mankind AS HE LIES with a woman.  (Men are not to penetrate men, & women have appropriate physiology so as to not require contact with that which is the 'abomination').   

Those wishing to partake in anal-acts may be able to justify their actions if they first light a fire inside the arse of the recipient; -- & then appeal to Ezekiel 4.

  Men & Men ... HOW?

To recap: According to the Torah, the following commandment was given to Moses, by God.  Violating it brings about a death penalty (under Moses' law).  In this respect, the commandment is similar to the very first given in Genesis.  According to the Scripture, God gives law intending for life (I.E: for the same reason we command children not to play in traffic).  Because of the nature of this commandment, we need to bind the reading of it very closely with the actual words, & within the greater context of the other Laws of God.  Many Christian "scholars" do not follow those very important principles in this subject area.  Why?  Bad company corrupts good character; -- Too much time with the snake!

"And a man who lies with a mankind AS one lies with a woman, both of them have done a detestable thing, dying they shall die; their blood on them." - Lev 20:13

Does the act shown in the frame to the left violate that commandment? 


The Law of Moses describes exactly "how" man can "lie" with a woman.  Yes, "sex" with women has a legally recognized specific form under Moses' law.  In the Law of Moses, the only lawful way "sex" was recognized with a woman was penetrative - vaginal It was evidence of that very thing that was checked for when a marriage was arranged & consummated under Moses Law.  The very fact that the Law forbids intercourse during a woman's menstrual cycle confirms this (Lev 20:18).  After all, if lawful sexual relations could be done apart from penetrative vaginal sex, then the prohibition on sex during menstruation is moot!  Under Moses law, sex with women was considered to be penetration in the 'proper' orifice.  This understanding becomes an anchor used to define the exact prohibition in Leviticus 20:13 above.  The phrase "as he lies with a woman" means "penetrative"; And since men have no "front hole" to 'penetrate', then only one other "hole" in the pubic region remains (for those bent on penetration).  Moses law simply makes it clear that "You don't do that thing!".  Note from the 2nd proof above: Contact with human feces was also considered an "abomination".  The text is in agreement with itself - as it must be!  God is not the author of confusion.  What was considered "sex' under Moses Law was not the slithering-love free-form of the Karma-Sutra!  So part of the problem in interpreting the Scripture happens when the interpreter uses his own "Karma-Sutra" standards (forming unjust measures) of behavior to misjudge what the phrase "as he lies with a woman" literally means under Moses' LawThey err not knowing the Scriptures! The commandment forbids a man from using a man's anus as a proxy for a woman's vagina.  And by creating the prohibition -  it bans the single most dangerous fetish-act that we know of: AnalSex. And that is PRECISELY/ONLY what Leviticus 20:13 forbids (Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius). The commandment at issue does NOT OUTLAW same gender intimacy (But the specific act of AnalSex). And that prohibition makes PERFECT sense because of how incredibly dangerous we know that act is. And because it is so perilous and good at spreading diseases that entire populations can become infected - even fatally and not even realize that they are spreading diseases themselves (often incurable & deadly) to other people until it is far to late and the inevitable damage will unstoppably manifest!  AnalSex destroys entire civilizations once in widespread practice. This is the REASON WHY the Torah names the practice a capital crime! Paul wrote: "Flee fornication. Every sin which a man may practice is without the body, but he that commits fornication sins against his own body." - I Cor 6.  OBVIOUS: Anal sex is a major vector for disease (STD's like AIDS).  It's not very pleasurable for the recipient; & the mechanics of the act cause other injuries -- well documented.  To quote a man who loves men, but is not into anal sex: "Anyone who thinks sticking you penis into a hole full of bacteria & sh!t constitutes 'sex', - probably keeps their head up there too!"

Just as God had said in Genesis that they could not eat of the one tree, - and evil expanded it with the phrase "neither shall ye touch it"; -- Likewise has a commandment been issued forbidding men "lying with mankind as one lies with a woman", --  been lawlessly expanded to "not touch"!  

It is a CAPITAL CRIME under Moses law to falsely accuse another person/s of a capital crime (Dt. 19:16-19)!  Read that until it sinks in.

So then, the Law in Lev 20:13 is specifically forbidding anal penetration -- the same form that male/male rape takes!  

But, doesn't "gay sex", mean "anal"?  0riginally, N0 ... BUTT today...
If you say "Gay Sex"; -Virtually everyone hears: "Anal Sex"... which is why G0YS was formed!

"And the commandment, which was for life, was found, as to me, itself to be unto death: for sin, getting a point of attack by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me." - Paul.  Or in other words: "And I made the discovery that the law whose purpose was to defend life - had become a cause of death: For I was tricked and put to death by sin, which found an opportunity to deceive by misrepresenting the law's intent."

The fact is that many, many men who have had relationships with other men involving physical intimacy (eros) have never desired nor participated in anal penetrationMost are initially repulsed by the idea!  Such repulsion is a proper feeling.  "Homo" "sex" does N0T equal "anal sex" by default, -- but society has swallowed a lie (pushed heavily by the gay-community itself) that asserts the two are synonymous.  Does the image to the left look like anal sex is part "Male/Male intimacy" in this context?  No!  What the picture shows is called "FR0T" - in which 2 guys make full body contact, & enjoy each other slow-cudl'n & luvn.  It's male-to-male, completely equal & contrary to common teaching, is NOT forbidden by the Scriptures!  Consider: The Scripture says that David loved Jonathan as he LOVED HIMSELF. So, what ACT does a guy do with himself if he's need'n some lov'n? So when the Scripture says that  these guys loved each other as they loved themselves; - What is being implied as to the nature of the relationship?  Take the blinders off!  The Hebrew texts virtually always veil intimate descriptions in terms that make you consider the textual implications.  That's why people who understand Song of Songs know that it's soft-core adult imagery veiled in similes, metaphors & allegories.  

So, what does the Torah command about men who climax sexually (w. someone or alone) WITHOUT having committed a crime?

The commandment is simple and is the same whether a man is alone or with another person: WASHING! See, it's NOT, even technically, a sin! If it was, there would be a sacrifice prescribed for it! AnalSex: Death-Penalty. Mutual Masturbation: Washing. Wake up!

"When a man has an emission of semen, he must bathe his whole body with water, and he will be unclean (unfit for ceremonial worship activities) until evening. Any clothing or skin on which there is an emission of semen must be washed with water, and it will remain unclean until evening. If a man lies with a woman and there is an emission of semen, both must bathe with water, and they will remain unclean until evening." Lev 15:16-18, v32 "This is the law of him who has a discharge, of the man who has an emission of semen whereby he is unclean". "When you are encamped against your enemies, then you shall keep yourself from every defiling thing. If any man among you becomes unclean because of a nocturnal emission, he must leave the camp and stay outside. When evening approaches, he must wash with water, and when the sun sets he may return to the camp." -Dt 23:10-11

The chart to the right models STD infection rates based on CDC statistics & presumes a virtually unlimited starting population with (1) infected individual at Year/0. What should shock you is the fact a logarithmic scale is needed to compare the contagion graphs! This is because the contagion rate of grows so explosively that a logarithmic chart was the only way to illustrate that growth without completely burying the other (2) comparisons! So remember that each vertical block represents a 10x increase over the last & so on (on the logarithmic chart)! Mouse over for a linear version. This chart says all!

Anal-sex (which technically - isn't sex at all - but a fetish with a non genital location) is an extremely dangerous behavior; - A behavior that many self-professed Heterosexual couples sometimes engage in as well as "gAys". It's what Paul was speaking of in Romans 1 when he wrote: "Women put aside the natural use thereof"!  It's bad judgment to have anything to do with it no matter what a person's "orientation" supposedly is.   Ironically, regardless of how dangerous the act of is, - there are people who will staunchly defend their "right" to partake in it.  That shouldn't be surprising ... after all, it was men who fuck'd sheep who were responsible for the spread of syphilis into human populations in the first place; --& anyone who wants to look can find groups of people who will staunchly defend their "right" to fuck all sorts of animal species.  Interestingly, but not surprisingly, these same people seem to insist that spreading their death-disease buffet into the rest of humanity is their "right" as well.  You see, evil/undiscerning people simply don't care who they hurt as long as they get what they want.  What G0YS promote is mutual affection, safety & considering the other person first.  Anal sex, by the very nature of what it consists of, -- is something that G0YS absolutely do not engage in (the rejection of which is what starkly defines us as G0YS)! And herein also lies the warning about so-called "pro-gay churches" that want to dismiss ALL condemnation surrounding the "gay" paradigm including the perils of Anal-Sex. These undiscerning heretics want you to write off the Old Testament (Torah) as if it was a document that was merely ornamental.  And with that theology - they accuse God of being "petty".  ALL DIVINE LAW IS GIVEN TO PREVENT INJURY & FACILITATE QUALITY LIFE.  I.E: It is a MEDICAL FACT that AnalSex is extremely perilous, injurious & disease-spreading at a rate +50 times higher than even OralSex!  ANYONE who downplays the seriousness of those FACTS (Say "Facts") is an enemy of humanity & God!  Scriptures such as Leviticus 18:22/20:13 mean EXACTLY what they say in the context of the original language & overall framing of the Torah; - No more and no less! Every Rabbi knows the specific prohibition is against AnalSex! Now you know WHY! No person acting in the Spirit of God advocates acts that frequently maim & spread deadly diseases nor would such a person misrepresent the EXACT commandment to embrace matters not so covered! 

"And if any man takes away from the words of this book, God will take away from him his part in the tree of life and the holy city, even the things which are in this book." - Rev 22:19/Bible  

It's primarily 3 main groups who promote the message that "gay sex = anal"
And society for the most part no longer questions the lie. These are: 

  • The religious right is a major spreader of the gangrenous teaching that "gay sex =anal sex"; Look at the signs in the picture to the right. The sign on the far right that reads: "FAG = ANAL SEX = |DEATH-SYMBOL|" summarizes their message that all men who luv men are into "anal-sex".  (G0YS are pleased to expose them as the liars they are.)

  • Then we have the gay-media & porn industry on the 'liberal left' (with their "anything goes" selfishness, -- unchecked by any healthy aversions);

  • Finally the "health" establishments backed by government/s who promote the so-called concept of "safe-sex" with slogans like "Use a condom EVERY time".  (See how the unspoken lie is built into the slogan.  After all: If you need a condom every time, there must be penetration every time, - which implies that gay-sex = anal).  

Just as Eve was deceived that simply touching was a forbidden act (subject to death) , so are those who believe the lie that male/male intimacy "NAWGAH" (touching) is what was forbidden by the Scripture; --  Or worse, - that male/male intimacy must always be "anal penetration".  It's a deadly buffet of lies spread by those who claim to be the "experts" of everything social ("Professing themselves wise, they became as fools..."! - Paul)  Who do you suppose is ultimately behind these murderous messages? 

The devastation of prejudice (prejudgment based on bad information), disease & death is the result of an accomplished liar!  See, sexual affection is a natural appetite.  In the garden of humanity (fleshed & dressed by God), the Serpent still insists that God has said that same-sex attracted people cannot eat from ANY of the proverbial trees (the Scripture also uses trees to symbolize men).  The fact is, that we are only commanded not to eat from a 'tree' (used figuratively) that brings harm.  See, the entire law is summed up in a couple of commandments:
1) Love God. 
2) Love people.
Love works no ill toward its neighbor -- therefore it fulfills the law (Gal 5:14)! 

Anal sex (not same-sex intimacy) is forbidden under Moses' law because it has a tremendous affinity to cause harm in so many ways.  Would you let a child play in a septic tank? See: It's not 'God being controlling for the sake of control'!  God forbade certain acts (I.E: anal-sex) because such acts can be absolutely devastating -- often deadly.    However, other forms of loving expression that are not forbidden, - are not forbidden (Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius ;-
Men who luv men, but abstain from anal-sex have as their testimony: One of the lowest rates of sexually transmitted diseases among any demographic.  Lesbians are probably the only group that is lower in STD incidences (And you'll notice the Law of Moses says NOTHING forbidding female/female intimacy, - despite how rabidly fundamentalism assails it)!  Some may argue that Paul forbids it in Romans 1.  That would be a neat trick: Was the man who instructed "not to go beyond what was written" (I Cor 4), suddenly going beyond what was written?!  Not at all!  In Romans 1, Paul describes acts that were part of pagan idolatry practices often done in clear public forum (how else would he have known of them to describe so fully)!  In describing acts of both men & woman, he uses the term "likewise" (v.27 or "in the same way").  Since the Law of Moses does not mention female/female sexual intimacy, Paul's use of the term "likewise" CANNOT be a blanket condemnation on acts that are called "homosexual" by today's standards; -- because if it was, he would be contradicting a basic principle of law - of NOT going beyond what is written in the statute.  Paul is saying that the acts that are worthy of death are forbidden under the Law of Moses (laws which we can look up).  So, what act/s would "likewise" apply to in Paul's exposé?  It is writtten: "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable.".  It's not a blanket prohibition of male/male intimacy:  It's about specific practices that sexually emasculated the man (via anal penetration)!   In the same CONTEXT, Paul's use of the terminology "women put aside the natural use" does not mean lesbianism (as there is no Law in Moses against such)!  Paul is talking about women who were having anal sex with men! The meaning is made clear in the next verse where Paul discusses men who burned their lust toward other men RECEIVING IN THEMSELVES THE PENALTY (How did it [the death-penalty / disease] get IN them)!  If it was Lesbianism Paul was critiquing, his description, coupled with the term "in the same manner", would make no sense in the context of the Torah. However, a woman who puts ASSide the "natural use" & has Anal-sex with a man, - does indeed "RECEIVE WITHIN" (get it?)!  In this light, it becomes painfully obvious that Paul's commentary on anal-sex in Romans 1, - has been used for centuries to baselessly condemn a group of people - to whom it was never intended: Merely same-gender attracted people - many of whom would NEVER participate in the act of AnalSex! AGAIN: Paul's condemnation (germane to the discussion here) is about the perverse practice of anal sex! 
Romans 2:1 right back at ya religious reicht! 
The misrepresentation of Paul's writing by those who condemn mere same sex affection is precisely what Peter wrote would happen! Check this out: "His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction." - Peter discussing Paul's writing/s, & those who distort them.  How does this "destruction" happen?   That's easy to see: When the act which is often spreads deadly diseases (anal sex) is not identified for what it is, - but instead, ANOTHER thing (same-sex intimacy) is named as the "abomination", - a deadly dynamic is set up on several levels:

  • God's character becomes marred -- as He is portrayed as an arbitrary rule maker, unable to acknowledge the needs & affections of people; -- but just on a power trip as "God".  (This is precisely what the Serpent proposed in Eden by suggesting that God had forbidden eating from ALL of the trees.)

  • By changing the command, the forbidden act is not seen for the deadly peril it is.  So at this point, you'll hear about self-pronounced "holy-straight" couples engaging in anal sex (the 'abomination'), & ironically, pointing the finger of judgment at same-gender couples & calling them 'abominations' (for simply being same gender attracted).  An evil irony, yes? God is not mocked. The "straight judgmental ass-fuckers" will end up in the very place they so callously threatened the same-sex couple with! 

  • Men who love men are told by so-called "Christians" that God rejects all same-sex intimacy & that they must 'change' to be accepted.  These self-righteous judges with a flawed view of holiness effectively shut up the kingdom of God in men's faces -- just as Jesus said the religious hypocrites of his day did.  So, feeling rejected by God for who they pair-bond with, the victims of that misinformation often (in an attempt to deal with horrible depression about being allegedly rejected by God) indulge in all sorts of revelry (after all ... if you're damned for just existing, then why follow any code of ethics?).  Self righteous bigots then seize on observing those shattered lives to use as alleged "evidence" against same-sex "lifestyles" -- once again missing the point that it isn't same-sex attractions that cause the misery, but violating Godly principles (having analsex for example).  Jesus observed that it was the offspring of the Devil who so religiously promoted lies that destroyed people.  So next time you see Phelps, Falzarano, Hinn, Falwell, Robertson, Kennedy, D'Aandrea & other "evangelists" playing the "anti-same-sex card", perhaps you'll understand who they really speak for!  Deadly "snake-oil", isn't it...   

  • Because the forbidden act (anal sex) is not specifically spoken against by these bigots, but lumped together with something not forbidden (same gender intimacy) by their lax, unjustified prejudice; -concepts simultaneously end up being -both added & subtracted from the word of God.  
    Here is the result: "I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book." -  REV 22:18-19   

Paul explains in the chapter directly after the one these unstable men use to lawlessly judge people with for merely loving their own gender while they themselves are hypocritically doing the same things & even what is forbidden!  "You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things!" - Rom 2:1 (Hypocrites in action: "ExGay" Liars exposed!) Paul continues ..."Now we know that God's judgment against those who do such things is based on truth.  So when you, a mere man, pass judgment on them and yet do the same things, do you think you will escape God's judgment?  Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, tolerance and patience, not realizing that God's kindness leads you toward repentance?  But because of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart "(I.E: those who will read this very study & yet refuse to repent)", you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God's wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed." - Paul's message to those who condemningly judge the ones he describes in Romans I because there were those in the church doing the same sort of things!  That message is sooo deep & on several levels.   Paul's writing was one that encouraged love, respect & stopping the endless critical-judgmentally of the outsiders!  (I don't know where modern fundamentalism thinks God is going to come up with 144,000 men who are undefiled with women [Rev 14], but lots of G0YS have a good idea ;-)      
Oh, one last point.  Paul says that those who judge others condemn themselves because they do the same things.  I had one legalist ask me how that could be true if he didn't ever have sexual activity with another guy.  My answer devastated him.  Paul wrote: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.." - Gal 3:28  Paul taught that in Christ, there is no MALE & FEMALE; -- therefore that fundamentalist & his wife are the "same type of genderless spirit being" in Christ.  Since this legalist's condemnation was on same-gender sexual activity, & Paul teaches that he & his wife are the same (HOMO) in Christ; - Then his own standard of judgment against people of (HOMO)-gender having sexual relations, -- turned against him!  The measure he was using came right back to judge him!
This concept of "same-sex" also applies to self-stimulation (masturbation), since the one giving the 'pleasure' is the same gender as the one 'receiving' itSo, we G0YS appeal to common-sense, -- not to use our freedom as a license (- never to hurt other people); -- But, as a foundation for living life as men free to express deep & physical affection to other men - while greatly respecting the image they were made in. "Love works no ill toward his neighbor, therefore: Love is the fulfilling of the Law!" -