

Remember
... +50% of men love men (to some
degree). Yet these very normal, masculine men were suddenly being
labeled by the same 3-letter term as the queens (drag/brownie) & the
child molesters of NAMBLA! And evil religion hammered that message to
raise fear, funds & control people. This dynamic is where the term
PERVERT got unjustly welded to ALL men who loved men/too. And men
who were "TRADE", pulled far back into the shadows because even they
wanted nothing to do with the flamboyant sociopaths & narcissists
getting the pictures & headlines whenever the press typed the word "GAY"
in a headline.

As explained elsewhere on this site: All mammalian life starts out
FEMALE inutero. Genes cause hormonal triggers to masculinize the body/brain but
in most men the original sexual aesthetic appreciation also remains. This is why
most guys are "BI". And when functioning correctly - men know the anatomical
differences between the sexes & how each is to be treated in proper sexual
context. This means that Bisexual men know how to sexually interact properly
with each gender. And because of a deeply rooted disgust reflex in relationship
to feces - AnalSex is a highly unnatural fetish with a non-genital organ that
results in a biohazard with a propensity to spread diseases at a whopping rate
+5000% higher than even oralsex! AnalSex is a deadly fetish as million of people
have sadly learned the hard way. Most men know this on a very deep, primal
level. It is only due to the toxic influences of a bad peer group that people
override this natural aversion to sh!t.
Men of good conscience side with
the g0ys positioning on this matter. Those who lack the moral inclination
to steer clear of the AssFuck-act are among the the hell-bound that have already
left a legacy of a rotting pile of corpses - millions of dead-men deep.
Morality
is not an abstract concept - but an innate belief system evidenced by the
numerous disastrous results of those who violate its principles. Again: Men of
good conscience know these things in their very core being which is the real
reason why the "GAY" community is shunned by most men. The issue is not the
gender of people who love each other. The issue is the connection the gay-male
community has adopted regarding sex in SH!THOLES. Ergo: GAY MEN LACK FUNDAMENTAL
EMPATHY - as evidenced by the promotion of the AssFuck Act!
And gay-media
broadcasts that message at a near blinding level.
|
It's the truth! And it's obvious
when you consider the facts. Kinsey's research dating back to the late 1940's
indicated that over 50% of the male
population was selectively amBIsexual. So why has society invented so
many slang terms deriding same gender intimacy? I can explain it from first hand
experience - being a guy who loves guys. Most guys find the imagery, fetishes &
conversation that comes out of the "GAY" male community to be extremely debased.
It's that simple and It's an innate gut-feeling set based on sound science. The
problem isn't loving a buddy; -But the notion that playing in SH!T might be
involved!
"I love my friends, but have
NO inclination to play inside assholes, NOR wear women's clothes NOR take on
the mannerisms of my aunt-Tillie; -& I find all such activities to be
disgustingly emasculating." - Me & Most Guys.
And after decades, most guys
still feel this way. However, so-called "political correctness" has caused many
to be more careful with their words. But, the general sentiment hasn't budged. However, men are more casually open with physical contact then several decades
ago because principles such a "Bromances", "Bruhs", "G0YS" & other casual male
bonding social phenomena have arisen giving an outlet to male/male affection
while still staying away from the stigmas of the "gay" label itself.
Photographic
history has revealed - that well over 60 years ago - traditional activities
considered "male" such as wrestling - became an excuse to photograph nude men, &
had a wide appeal to an audience large enough to support an underground culture
of male vibrato that lacked gender-bending and completely shunned anal-sex
(while funding multiple publications showcasing the male bodyform as "art").
Great efforts were made to represent such photography as showcasing art, history
& athletics (but everybody involved really wanted to see beautiful men in the
least amount of clothing possible) with the sole purpose of the staging to
leverage the 1st Amendment & evade the prude, censor & self-appointed
morality-mob. What a social mine-field & mind job!
And, there was terminology that
described men who were into masculine men: "TRADE". And Kinsey's research
revealed that this appealed to the vast majority of men. Masculine beauty,
aesthetics & mannerisms were components of men in the "TRADE". Body-building (in
part) grew out of this aesthetic appreciation for the male bodyform as art.
There
was also a minority of men who were effeminate, genderfucks & more likely to be
what we consider gay-stereotypes today. They were also labeled with the term: "SO".
Thousands of years ago, the Romans had a term for such men too: "SEMI-VERI".
Literally, "HALF-MALE". And it was THAT group of "SEMI-VERI"
who were likely to be into drag, anal-sex & gender-fuck. Today we know that the
behavior of AnalSex has spread over 95% of sexually transmitted diseases
suffered by humanity and the direct cause of millions of deaths globally since
the 1960's! Such "gays" are EMPATHY-DEFICIENT!
Thousands of years ago in Greece
& later in Rome it was seen as colossally shameful to be identified as "SEMI-VERI"
(yet neither culture had issue with men who loved men, whatsoever); -& likewise,
it was seen as shameful to be "SO" when discussing "TRADE"
thousands of years later! One of the best known & loudest gay-activists of all
time (Larry Kramer) identified the callous behavior of the "gay" community &
called it "murderous".
Murderous. AnalSex promoting, Disease-spreading, &
EMPATHY DEFICIENT! SO SEMIVIRI!
In the late 1960's - shortly
after the Stonewall riots, the "media" began to cover the topics of "gay"
liberation with an ever increasing number of stories & photographs as people
turned out for socials, parades & libcentric events. And what happened was
predictable in hindsight: The most bizarre & flamboyant of the crowd are those
who got photographed. And it was THOSE bizarre images that were thrust into the
public eye every time the term "GAY" made headlines. This hypnotic
mischaracterization was seized upon by the religious-reicht and used as a basis to
raise money in order to "defend the children against the gays". And let me
remind you that NAMBLA was originally also part of that "gay" movement! It became a social
tragedy that lax, slanted journalism ended up painting men who loved men with
the same brush used to display child-molesters (NAMBLA), drag-queens & those
promoting analsex (referred to as "brownie-queens"). It was the
mass-media that ignited the homophobia of the 20th century & it continues to
push a narrative of lies & half truths until this very day! True journalism is
an endangered occupation.
Consider this song from way back in the 1980's.
This is where the real social
separation dynamic occurred in the "gay" male community. Men of good conscience
began to step away from the tainted term "GAY", -while the flamboyant group of
semiviri that had seized the eye of the press loudly extolled its
bankrupt-morality of pure, disease-spreading decadence; -also representing itself as
the face & voice of "GAY" that they also called "Queer".
What a FUCK!NG disaster! A perfect storm of lies came upon a society that had
forgotten +3000 years of history; -& in almost no time, the EXACT TYPE OF
RELATIONSHIP THAT DAVID & JONATHAN IN THE BIBLE HAD
ENJOYED (See: 2nd Sam 1:26),
was relabeled as an "ABOMINATION" by RELIGIOUS HACKS & INTELLECTUALLY LAZY SEMINARY
STUDENTS who didn't stop to examine the massive cultural & historical
differences between men who were "TRADE" vs. the half-men who were
"SO"! |
The fact that over 50% of the
male population is selectively ambisexual makes perfect sense when you discard
the notion of innate monogamy. A quick look at history shows polygamy to be the case in
every ancient civilized culture (Astonishingly enough - the Bible is one of
the best references for this fact - loaded with examples of men who had
more than one wife. And the relationship between Prince Jonathan & David the
Sheppard (future king) makes perfect sense when you figure out that you're
clearly looking at legitimate
pederasty between the two)! And g0ys have no issue with the
possibility that the guy they're currently cuddling with may have interests in
women & want (or currently have) a more traditional family. In the example
of David & Jonathan - each did have at least one wife. As soon as you no
longer need to make a choice regarding either/or relationship status - the
dilemma of who gets to love who goes away. Lots of men already know this and the
"fishing trip" where nobody does much fishing is much more common than people
realize. And when these events occur - it's not one guy looking to replace
a woman with a man. It's about a guy who has a need to be intimately bonded with
another guy who innately understands what it is to BE a guy.
Pillow-talk between such men often consists of family, friends, work, problems,
health, etc. It's completely normal conversation that 2 very close guys would
have in a context free from the stress of whatever else may be going on in life.
It does NOT represent a threat to family because dispelling the notion of
monogamy eliminates the dilemma of "Who can I be with sexually". This is
especially true between men who were physically intimate early on - before
having traditional families. And this is how society operated for THOUSANDS of
years. The Greek saying was: "You can lift the Bull if you carried the Calf".
The
expression is a reference to early male/male intimate friendships in the context
of Pederasty where a teenage guy would would befriend another guy -usually
shortly after the younger had entered puberty (but relationships closer in age
were also common). One dimension of the friendship that usually developed
was sexual. Analsex was ILLEGAL & that fact destroys the notion that
these intimate friendships resembled the odd, gender-bending gay relationships
showcased in modern media. The part of the previous expression: "You can lift
the bull" is referring to the bull's testicles. In simple terms - if you
had a tender, supportive intimate friendship earlier in life - you should be
able to respectfully hold his balls later in adulthood without being gored.
Pederasty (Greek model) produced
some of the greatest male friendships in history: Alexander the Great w. General
Hephaestion, King David & Prince Jonathan. And
Baron Friedrich von
Steuben (military consultant to the
Revolutionary Army under hire of George Washington). Baron von Steuben sticks
out as a historical enigma. Modern commentary tries to paint him as "gay".
However SODOMY (AnalSex) was highly illegal in the military. The prohibition is
no barrier to a traditional pederast - as their inclinations do NOT involve AnalSex!
Coming from Prussia, he had a different perspective on social norms. He is also
credited with creating America's professional army! Tough as nails - he
also made it openly clear that he had great affection for men. And the troops
adored him! HOW could these seeming incongruence's be! He was a military
pederast in the truest sense of the word! In the military from the age of 17;
-He combined strength of character with love, tenderness, discipline, affection,
humility & a visible empathy for people - especially MEN. When the
war ended, Baron von Steuben was granted U.S. citizenship and moved to New York
with William North and Benjamin Walker (both former aides-de-camp). �We
love him,� North wrote, �and he deserves it for he loves us tenderly.�
So, contrary to all of the focus
on the rituals surrounding the practice of AnalSex expressed in the "gay"
community; -Men involved in the vast majority of male friendships that involve
sexuality have no innate interest whatsoever in playing in anyone's anus.
Most men find the idea repulsive (& wisely so)! These friendships usually deepen
& become intimate for a number of reasons that occur in the natural course of
close physical contact & relaxed physical acceptance. Men who express high serum
levels of testosterone in the form of increased musculature, bone-density &
aggression become sexually attractive and the more prominently testosterone
expresses itself - the more likely other men are to recognize its expression &
find it desirable in the man exuding the traits caused by it.
Simply
put, guys who are friends & physically comfortable with each other may discover
that activities that bring them to orgasm with their buddy are extremely
conducive to building the friendship. The raw fact is that men mature sexually
from 13 to 15 years of age and with sexual maturity comes the need to ejaculate
regularly to keep body & psyche in balance. Men jack-off because it
temporarily takes the sexual-tension away that is otherwise whispering in their
ears constantly. And men who are friends & trust each other often
discover that it is far more satisfying to have a buddy do the job of jacking
than you doing it yourself. And once close physical contact results in orgasm
mixed with the brain chemicals of oxytocin, serotonin, & dopamine - the stage is
set to repeat the pleasurable experience & bond the friendship like concrete in
the mutual sharing. And for
thousands of years - this was the natural rhythm of the best male friendships.
. . . That is, until a group of men who dress like women & call
themselves "father" while molesting little children - pulled the biggest con in
the history of humanity & hoodwinked society into believing that they
"represented God"! And this "God" was one whack-job of a prude - in light of
Kathylich standards
(And if you don't like what I'm saying then you need a fuck!ng history lesson
starting at or about the
Spanish
inquisition!). I am not antiChristian. I am, anti-deception.
And I am anti-deception because I
am also high-trait-empathy in my personality and deception causes injury &
death. And because I care about people - I do not want to see people injured or
killed by acting on the lies of liars!
I love men and I enjoy
contact
with fit, attractive men. Why? To make friends of them, of course! Friendship is
always a good platform to build from. I.E: Having studied physical therapy - I can
wrestle a man & when I feel comfortable enough, -I add massage & physical
manipulations that produce cracks & pops as joints reset & spines align. Most
men immediately succumb to the physical pleasure this brings & relax as I slowly
work them over. And once you've given guys a good massage - they always come
back for more. And this sets the future tone for all future interactions:
Relaxed, physical, fun & trusting. When I was in school (starting in Jr high) I
figured this out. It was natural. And soon these same guys were staying
overnight, going camping & were among my best friends. But when we'd get alone -
these same guys (who would often berate "fags" in school) - would lock my door, pull
my blinds, undress & talk me into giving them a massage. You see - in their
minds - this activity is simply what put the "BEST" in the term "BEST-FRIENDS".
At the exact same time - these guys were locking my door and pulling the blinds;
-it was because they didn't want anyone to see what was going on and mistake it
for "GAY". You see, extremely close physical contact, gentle affection & love
wrapped in respect was completely natural & MALE activity to all of these guys.
BECAUSE IT IS. These same guys also realized that the "gay-media" had soiled
such closeness between men & associated it with the ass-fuck! One day my friend, Carlos, asked me why I was "so good to him" &
I matter-of-factly replied, "Because I fuck'n love you from balls to brows,
brother." & kept on massaging him. One of my friends asked me if I was ever
worried that people would accuse us of being gay if they saw how close we got
physically when we were alone. My reply was considered well in advance: "Gays
give & take it up the ass and I'd never do that sh!t to a bro I love &
respect.". And I followed up with a smile in my voice while adding, "But I
might be willing to give you an occasional hand-job is you ask really nice.".
I'd known Paul for a few years (since 4th grade) at that point. He snorted a
laugh but the fact was that he was thinking about that comment quite intensely
because it struck a chord.
Paul wasn't interested in ass-fucking anyone. He was
getting wood more & more frequently when I'd massage him.
Most men are
selectively BIsexual and Paul was discovering just how much love a friendship
could contain without threatening his sense of being a guy. It was toward the
end of the school year when he stayed over on a weekend during break. I had a
basement bedroom and the temperature was always in the low 60's(F) due to the
ground temperature. The guest bed was in my room, but the television was lined
up with my bed. Yeah - I set it up intentionally that way because to watch a
movie - my guest would end up in my bed & the low room temperature was a
guarantee that he'd be under covers with me. And over the course of the night -
I'd end up massaging him right out of his clothes & because nudity is regularly
part of massage - getting guys to schuck all their clothing wasn't that
difficult to do - because they were still under the covers & we'd been in
locker-rooms too many times to count anyhow. I've had guys
ask if being with a nude guy made me uncomfortable. My stock answer which was
quite premeditated was 2 fold: I'd say that I wouldn't be comfortable with just
anyone - but because we were good friends -
I was totally fine hanging out
locker-room mode with them. And then I'd usually add a reassurance - something
like, "But trust me Bro, - you've got nothing to be self conscious about.". And
sometimes - depending on the guy, adding a pause & asking (in a sincere tone):
"...unless you're self-conscious about ... something...".
And then I'd give 'em a
friendly look that expressed a hint a curiosity, & challenge to their
self-confidence if they were to have 'something' they were self conscious of.
It's a turn around on the psychology of nudity. You make is clear that you don't
see anything wrong with it - but suspect the motives of people who do. This tone
can be set in a completely respectful frame. It usually puts a smile on the
other guy's face & they end up doubling-down of being nude. And there was one attitude I
broadcast loudly whenever anyone would mention the subject of AnalSex - I made
it a point to put a subtle look of disgust on my face & add commentary along the
lines of "Dirty, Disrespectful, Disease-Spreading, Deadly & Damn-UNmasculine"
-because that is the truth & also precisely how I felt about the subject. And
when your buddies know that you have a real disdain with even the notion of the
AssFuck - then they know that you are NOT amicable to "those who
would do such things". And when you draw THAT hard line - people
who know you also know that you have no inclination to ever engage in that act.
And because the "GAY" stereotype is completely wrapped up in the act of the
AssFuck; - loudly opposing it cuts you off from any association w. that demographic! Men who are
your friends & know you're absolutely opposed to the AssFuck will be much more
open to your affection because they know you'd NEVER violate them in that
manner. This moral posturing is the very foundational difference between G0Y vs.
GAY and it is a monumental point of contention.
And how does this difference in
perspective affect relationships? It's awesome. You end up with a number of
friends that are closer than brothers. Extended family is a term that barely
begins to describe how these guys interact with you. You become the guy that
they can be naked without shame & close to. And a number of them (about
33-40%) end up showing the fact that they are somewhere on Kinsey's sexuality
scale other than (0). And you'll begin to hear it from people: "Wait, Are you
guys brothers?" I began to hear it enough that my instant reply would be, "Well,
we have different mothers". Notice that I did NOT say that "we're brothers". I
simply jump to the fact we have different mothers and let presumptions go where
they will. Most guys - especially guys you're bonded to - will smile & go along
with the charade. Lots of guys experience their "coming of age sexually" with
another guy. And it usually happens in the same context. To resume my story
about my friend "Paul" from above - he was early to hit puberty at full speed as
was I. I was about 5'8" and he was about 5'4" tall. He was one of those guys who
had no body fat & was really striated under his clothes - sexy-hot early on. I
had started working out when I hit puberty so I was respectable physically for
my age. Once I had Paul in bed with his clothes off I mentioned that I slept in
the buff & got naked. Once that I had Paul in my hug as I rubbed on him his
heartbeat & breathing were aerobic zone - as I guess mine were too. Once I
rolled him toward me -
chest to chest, balls to balls & his raging hardon met
mine he lasted less than a minute before he arched his back & tightened his ass
as he ejaculated a nutt-storm all over my abs. It set me off instantly & what a
freak'n, hott mess.
There are MILLIONS of guys
with that same story told in a nearly infinite number of ways. Nobody
get's ass-fuck'd. Nobody put's on his sister's clothes. Nobody has a sudden urge
to attend a parade where people with contrary value sets shove their asses in
everyone's face. It's a colossal fuck'n tragedy that so many guys have been
brainwashed to think that such a gentle, shared intimacy means they need to
consider if it "makes" them part of some socially-constructed demographic that
shuns the effects of testosterone. And on the other side of the valley of lies
are the religious hacks (millions of them or more) who promote the lie that such
intimacy is "an abomination" or words to that effect. The
Hebrew-Christian Scriptures have NOTHING BAD to say about same gender intimacy.
Doubt that? Click here.
|