Remarkably common are testimonies just
like the following:
grew up in a neighborhood where boys having 'sex' with boys was the rule,
on a regular to occasional basis. As an almost unbroken rule, the 'sex'
involved mutual masturbation as well as oral sex. Anal sex was
generally non-existent. Given that this was a form of sexual
interaction involving boys who had the most sex with their best friends,
and lesser amounts of sex with lesser friends, male bonding factors
applied - as well as sexism . That is, we were all aware of what we were
to do with females, as some of us were doing - as in fucking - but
would never think of doing that [anal intercourse] to one's best friend,
considered to be one's equal." -
"I hate women."
"They're all whores."
quotes from notorious womanizing men!
Rhetorical Question: The women who
have sexual relations with such men - what are they experiencing:
- Love; -
- Or merely being used?
I think the answer is obvious.
The irony is that I know both of the men who made the statements quoted above.
Overall - they're basically regular guys, good friends & they have no shortage of female
They do not represent an odd class of westernized man: However -
each has a stream of women who seem to have no number & certainly no
permanence in these guys lives. These guys are considered extremely 'virile' &
sexually active/successful males in the eyes of most who know them. They
also have a clique of friends in whom the boast about their latest sexual
as noted: These guys do not have long term female relationships - nor do they
seem able to sustain them.
Remarkably: I have observed the exact same pattern of behavior in the gay-male community:
Endless one-night stands with guy-strangers; -- No relationship steadfastness or permanency. And the irony is that many of
these gay men have "female friends" in whom they confide their most
intimate secrets & exploits. There is a reason
why the "fag-hag" exists in stereotype.
Of course - not one brush paints the whole picture - especially when fidelity
to form is required. However - because the men described above constitute
large clusters of well recognized behavior patterns; -- I thought I'd take a
look into sexual moirés & make some educated guesses as to the underlying
- Men who fixate on sex without the ability to bond with or appreciate the
long-term aspects of their lovers are victims of prejudiced thinking patterns.
- And their partners usually reinforce the prejudiced beliefs.
- And society / marketing media reinforces these beliefs.
So - What IS the PREJUDICE?
The prejudice is the same as most: The belief that the other person is
unequal - usually inferior, of less worth & lacking rights. This basic
belief is the foundation for contempt. After all: If a man is at the mercy of
someone whom he feels is inherently inferior to him - the need for the inferior
person generates a sense of resentment and a need to further demean the other in
order for the man (who feels humiliated in his need of the inferior) to regain
his sense of superiority.
Put this way: A man is never more vulnerable then when he is naked & sexually
aroused. A man's orgasm controls him - makes him subject to it & seizes
control of his body & his responses. That's a lot of power to give another
person over you. If the person who has such power over you is someone you
feel is inferior to you -- then the implication is that the weak - weakens the
strong; -& the strong is incapable of stopping the events that lead to their own
weakening! This is why there is an endless string of one-night stands but
no lasting relationships or strong bonds of deep friendship.
Media & marketing promote this imbalanced thinking by constantly stressing
the differences between genders. Such differences are usually the product of
culture rather than nature. Consider westernized culture & body hair as a
dynamic. A man who does not shave is simply being a "man". He can let
pits, pubes & chest grow without too much chance of being socially outcast.
However - how is a woman viewed who lets here pits, pubes & leg-hair grow
uncontrolled? Hmmm. Is the hair in these places UNnatural for her?
If not, then why the perceptual distaste? The answer is social
conditioning. Companies that make hair removal related products have a lot
at stake if women suddenly accept themselves the way nature makes them. Need I say more to prove my point?
The fact is
that there are tremendous similarities between the genders. 2 eyes and a nose,
10 fingers & 10 toes. Why do men have nipples? Western society seems
terrified of the similarities. Hmmm. Of course, most people buy into
the bias without considering what they're buying into. Western societies
love to point at practices of other cultures like the lip-disk, neck-rings or
foot-binding. "Silly pagans!", we yell at them as we apply the shaving
cream, the blade & then the make-up. How far is the ear-ring from the
Of course - those who buy into this message that screams "HETERO" or
"different" - perpetuate the imbalanced thinking by promoting the same ideology
in their communications. A Man who believe himself to be superior can
only be with a woman who believes it. An assertive woman soon is seen as
being a "bitch" -- and she may well be if she sees men as inferior to her! Whatever
the form - the philosophy of 'inequality' spawns endless occasions for people to
deride & denigrate each other over frivolity. Consider the civil war that
broke out in Rwanda - where 2 groups of people were killing each other over
physical traits that amounted to average height & the shape of the nose!
And others such as Hitler's 'final solution', slavery in the US -based on racial
beliefs, the Camarouge who were killing people who wore eye-glasses.
Endless manifestations but a common symptom: A belief that certain physical
traits create superior/inferior classes of people. The most common is the
As expressed earlier: This imbalance has numerous manifestations - all similarly accusing
the worthiness of the other person. In M/F relationships, the dynamic is
endless sexual partners & no relationships of any depth because one or both
people are too fixated on their own superiority - or the one who believes [him/her]self
to be superior becomes filled with contempt & a petty attitude for the other.
Among M/M couples - the schism of DOMINANT/SUBMISSIVE is mirrored by the
extremely unequal act of analsex: TOPS/BOTTOMS. Since the ANUS is NOT a
genital organ -- the practice is derived from a flawed perception that
penetration somehow equals sex.
Men - lacking a vagina, have no
baseline of comparison for the female part of sex other than the
A male who BOTTOMS is merely emulating what he has SEEN - what he
do. Is there any wonder why the "gay-male" community is preoccupied with drag &
x-gender behavior? Of course there are people in the gay community who
will deny my observations as a 'prejudice'. However - those same critics
will fail to identify where the practice originated & where the ideas for it
Why is the stereotype of the gay-man one in which the
person puts female affectations into his mannerisms. It may be a
stereotype, - but stereotypes are based on identifiable behavior-clusters that can be
spotted easily in the fabric of society. A gay-man who TOPS is merely
EMULATING what he thinks is a masculine sexual act (because at his core
being he feels less than a man - the act of penetrating gives him a faux-sense
of being more masculine); And the BOTTOM takes on the
psychology of a proxy-khunt. Because the anus is not a female genital -
but an anus -- the act of using it as a proxy is a fraud: Which is
some have identified that act as a crime against nature. Technically - it is!
In other words: A gay-man who TOPS another man is seeking the same type of
environment to insert his penis into that would exist in a Male/Female
sexual exchange. The female vagina is specifically designed for this act.
An anus (male or female) is NOT. The act (when anal) is a
fraud. It is not sex because sex is about genitals - not rectums. (However -
giving benefit of the doubt where any may exist: Guys doing the top/bottom thing
may do so because someone TOLD THEM a few zillion
times that this is HOW men sexually interact.
"Over-ride your common-sense & do like this..."! Letting someone else manipulate
the space between your ears can be a dangerous thing -- especially when the
thing between your ears is guiding the thing between your legs! Sex is
about a focus on genitals - not arses!)
Historically, anal-rape was the most grievous insult that could be dealt to a
foe. Why? Because of the widespread belief in many cultures (past & present)
that women were weak (because they are generally weaker physically); --So to rape a man (to penetrate him) was to "make a
woman of him" - to make him "weak". Technically, in the legal sense of natural law: Analsex IS
a crime. Moses wrote that the act was a mala- inse' crime -- a capitol
offense. So, while other nations were "raping" their defeated foes ... Israel
was NOT. His law against it turns out to have been appropriate on another
level; -- Because anal-sex<sic>
spreads diseases (many deadly) explosively into any population that takes up the
practice According to studies - the act spreads STI's
effectively than all other forms of "sexual contact". Cultures that
take up that practice destroy themselves. We're watching it -right now-
infect the globe; - proving the point. Argument over.
The male/male phenomenon currently expressing itself as the g0y men's
movement is actually nothing new. Historical evidence clearly shows
periods in time among certain cultures such as the Greeks - when male/male
intimacy & sexual interactions were accepted & openly celebrated. While
the modern "gay male community" has made an appeal to the Greeks as progenitors
of the gay movement; - The fact that AnalSex was illegal in ancient
Greece effectively filters & excludes from 80%-90% of today's current
"gay male" culture! Ironic? I think so.
As recent studies (from Kinsey to current Internet polls) show, about +60% of
the population experiences varying amounts of Same Gender Attractions (SGA).
About 10% of those are exclusively SGA. The monumental implication is that
+50% of the population is ambisexual (Bi). 1 out of every 2 people can
swing both ways! Recent studies about "homophobia" have shown that people
with the highest levels of homophobia are usually people with a high propensity
to experience SGA. Many ask why. I believe the reason for fear of
SGA has several reasons - perhaps many ... but only (3) are primary:
- Current widespread religious beliefs that are critical & negative of all
- An innate fear of being sexually abused, anally raped & effectively
- A fear of being ostracized because of stigmas connected to the above 2
factors (being labeled part of a socially offensive group).
Because the imagery connected to the act of anal-sex (& other forms of
scat-fetish) - is so repugnant to so many people - the baseline feelings of
revulsion & disgust form a powerful psychological barrier that prevents scrutiny
of the prejudice & to whom the negative feelings actually apply. In other
words: Once an image locks in the mind of a viewer that relays a sense of
disgust and then that image with the associated negative feelings are connected
to a word (such as 'gay'), -the prejudice sets like concrete against the term
-- now connecting the word to the imagery & the feeling. The next time the term
is used to label somebody - the feeling accompanies it.
Disgust is a powerful emotion evoked by the imagery of something vile, impure
& contaminating. Let me illustrate how powerful it is with a true story.
Years ago, the BBC did a special on food processing facilities. During
filming at a juice making company - a camera shot showed a stainless steel
conveyor belt covered with freshly washed vegetables headed toward the
pulverizors - where they are crushed & made into juice. However - on this
occasion, the camera also caught a large live snake slithering along the
conveyor & falling into the pulverizor where it was inevitably smashed up, cut &
wrung into the juice. The commentator for the BBC asked "Aren't you going
to stop that!?" - pointing at the overall operation. The reply was along
the lines of "No - the batch consists of so much juice that something like a
snake being mixed in doesn't violate the government contamination standards.".
My question is: How much pulverized snake are you willing to accept in your
juice? Pay close attention to the feeling you are experiencing as you
consider drinking down a glass of juice you know contains some small part of
snake-oil. Powerful emotion, isn't it!
One of the goals of the g0y men's movement is to remove
0urselves from any ASSociation with the term gAy & hence, -zero out the negative emotions
currently smeared on all male/male intimacy because of the destructive imagery
promoted by the vocal minority called the "gay-male community" (& the prejudices reinforced by the
religious-fundamentalists of several faiths). The gay-male community is heavily preoccupied with
rectums, feces & scat-fetish. That is an undisputed fact and one only need
to look at the overwhelming majority of gay porn publications to see that this fetish
is readily accepted & considered the PRIMARY, integral gay male denominator. As pointed out elsewhere; -Only in
that subculture is
a fascination with feces a tolerated 7 celebrated behavior. Society overwhelming
understands the biohazard surrounding it & spends BILLION$ every year to safely
dispose of sewage. How much feces is acceptable in your snake-juice,
eh - I mean fruit-juice!?
The fact that feces ("SHIT") is a massive health hazard is not only accepted by the
general public, but scientifically established as a leading public health
concern. Yet - a group of PERVERTS - wants to celebrate
filth-play as part
of their eroticism! And would you look at the statistics: The gay male
community has the highest rate of STI's (+4200% higher than the general public
at large according to the American Red Cross)! Should we be surprised?
One of the most remarkable reactions from people who hear
about the g0y men's movement is "Male/Male sexuality that doesn't involve AnalSex
or a preoccupation with filth!? Wow - never even considered it."
What the g0y men's movement has done is provide a platform for men to adopt
that draws a clear line of ethics against analsex as well as opposing other
fetishes with filth; - (not against gender
composition). The g0y movement expresses the belief that current "gAy male
culture" is generally immoral for these primary reasons.
- The widespread fetishes with filth & AnalSex -which is essentially a
- treats a man as a proxy for a woman (in numerous avenues of expression).
- provides an avenue for the explosive spread of diseases - which is 'immoral'
because people get hurt.
- Promotes & supports those same actions - which makes the community as
a monolith willfully
complicit. a/k/a "Accomplices"
|While the issues of "FRAUD" & "TORTS" are not
usually considered religious, - but legal in
nature; -- G0YS point out that in the Torah - Moses' command against 'Men lying
with mankind as he does a woman" has no symmetrical prohibition against "woman
lying with woman as with a man". The lack of a reciprocal commandment in a
volume of LAW (The Torah is a
volume of LAW.) speaks volumes. Since it is a fundamental
principle of law to not go beyond the letter of what is written
(inclusio unius est exclusio alterius) -- then it is
immediately clear that Moses has no prohibition against 'woman lying with women'!
Is this a matter of Moses playing gender favorites? No.
For one: It's a
matter if biology. Under Moses law - the only lawful way for a man to "lie" with
a woman was to penetrate her. Throw your Karma-Sutra away. Since
women have proper anatomy to be penetrated; - There is defined the 'natural use'.
However, if a man was to lie with a man as with a woman under Moses law -
then the man would be, by definition - penetrating a man. Since a
man has no appropriate anatomy with which to be penetrated -- then the
back hole (anus) becomes the unlawful target. Under Moses law - it
is unlawful to come into contact with human dung. What would a penis
inside a rectum be in contact with?
G0YS unfold the
law to overcome the religious prejudice against same gender attractions that
many, many people have been oppressed with their entire lives. This understanding reframes
Romans chapter 1 & shows Paul's expose against ungodliness not to be one against
women with women & men with men; - But against women and men having anal sex.
There is also a valid 2nd reading of that same prohibition against "men laying
with mankind as he lies with a woman." The term "AS HE LIES" can also be
the basis of temporal framework - meaning "AT THE SAME TIME". Although the
law does not forbid same gender intimacy, the rules regarding man/woman were
quite solid. Western society is out of touch with most of these for
several reasons. In Moses' culture - polygamy was generally accepted.
A man might have several wives. There is no law against women lying with women
because a man may choose to sleep with several of his wives at the same time.
Throughout the dark night a man might be woken several times to copulate with
any of those wives & the issue of "who's child it is" would never arise.
However - if a man had a paramour (male lover) the law in Leviticus 18:22 states that the 2 men
cannot lie together at the same time a man is lying with a woman (a wife,
concubine). This is because having 2 men in the same bed as a woman would
introduce legal questions as to the paternity of children sired. The
concept of "exclusivity gay" was not a legal consideration because men were
generally seen as ambisexual - & every honest Rabbi KNEW
about the dynamics of David & Jonathan well before either was born -- because
what was written about them is common to man anyhow.
From a legal standpoint: Adultery (sexual activity with another man's wife) was
a capitol offense -with good reasons: A man should never be expected to raise another's
child; - And uncontained sexuality spreads disease/infertility/death. 2
men in the same bed with a woman opens a Pandora's box of litigation woes. Once
again - the issue was not being made of 2 of the same gender being
together - but of issues of law regarding paternity, adultery, etc.
Due to the Hebrew man's right to contract at his coming of age - there was
nothing to stop 2 Hebrew men from making covenant with each other & within those
covenants expressing love & mutual care for each other's family. They
have the fundamental right to self determination & the mingling of their affairs
with whom they choose. Unless a 3rd party has a legal interest (as would
be the case of the father of a BRIDE) - nobody has authority to encumber a
contract made in good faith between two men. If two men of
legal age fell in love & want to merge their lives; - They simply DID IT.
Two self-determining beings made in God's image wouldn't ask for permission for
what is a fundamental right of contract! This is precisely
what David & Jonathan illustrated with their love & subsequent covenants; --
Which is HOW the kingdom of Saul became David's; -
& WHY David was able to probate it to Jonathan's
son Mephibosheth; -& was the legal basis for David's adoption of Mephibosheth &
his family into David's. It is all in David's love-covenant with Prince
Jonathan. READ THE
Peter specifically said that people who did not understand legal
fundamentals would misread Paul's writings (to the detriment of many) & this is precisely what has happened
in reference to Romans chapter 1 and ALL OCCURRENCES where the term "HOMOSEXUAL"
or equivalent occurs in translations of the Scripture. This is much
further explained in the
GOD HATES section of the g0ys website.
In contrast to the "gay-male" community & the "bar scene" (which
bolster the principles of unbridled pleasure, passion & a gross disconcert for
civility in general as made clear in many publications); - g0ys believe that effectively dealing with the subjects
above puts to rest issues of law & conscience (not in a dismissive light or tone
of frivolity -- but in good conscience, good faith and an atmosphere of
understanding the WHY).
In summary: G0YS believe that loving relationships cannot co-exist with attitudes of
contempt for: law, morality & humility; And that law, morality & humility do not
encumber same gender relationships, - butt only certain acts that tend to cause harm.
The g0y difference?
The testimony in the orange
paragraph (above-left) is interesting in 2 massively
- First, it makes clear the 'sexism' present in the author's life during his
youth. Women were seen by him & his peers to be different in regards to
sexual matters then their friendships.
- And, without the constraint of an externally applied moral code, -
these guys were sexually active with each other in proportion with the level
of friendship; -- But all possessed an innate moral disdain for the concept of
anal-sex -believed to demean the man - & therefore was seen as a
disrespectful act. These guys knew instinctively that men don't buttphuck
other men & doing so would have meant alienation from the group.
These factors considered; - The obvious conclusion that can be drawn is
that in the natural state, a male peer group will instinctively draw a
hard-line of separation at actions that are seen as emasculating, - & distance
themselves from those who promote/partake in such actions.
It's also of interest to note that this author mentions (elsewhere) that his
peer group did not consist of any effeminate acting guys or anyone who might fit
a "gay stereotype". His testimony was an account of his life growing up in
the 1960's - prior to Stonewall & in a cultural paradigm where these guys were
not aware of the 'perversion' called 'homosexual' until later on in life.
This account is remarkable because it shows a dynamic among male friends that
involved sexuality - directly correlating to the degree of friendship; -- & set in a context
of a natural moral code for interaction with peers without external
influence or shaming with arbitrary rules. A key point is that these guys knew by instinct that
penetrating a guy was a demeaning unmanly, act.
The account above is not unusual. What was remarkable is that doing
research on this subject lead me to peer groups consisting of rough 'n tumble
guys (now older with lady-wooing reputations) who were involved in 'circle-jerks' & other male/male sexual interactions
(never anal) throughout their youth; & these guys would be the first to hurl a
'phag-insult' at effeminate or anally promiscuous men. Many still have
sexist attitudes that follow them throughout their lives. Watching these -
they often end up in divorces in which their attitudes toward women being
'unequal' comes out in regular conversation. And yet - the "equal" the
buddy they got-off with in their youth remains a lifelong close friend.
Perhaps if more men saw their spouses as "equals" instead of another species -
their relationships would be more stable. Of course - a woman must also see
herself in the same light; -And the belief must be held as a core understanding
of the reality of things -- not as some abstract philosophy to be aspired to (as
an internal self-evident truth; - not an external ideal to be 'lived up to'.).
This innately respectful male sexuality is the very heart of being g0y.
It is the dynamic where guys humbly enter each other's personal space to show
acceptance, affection & among the closest friends - alleviate tension via
extended physical contact. Among male peers in groups that understand that
penetration=disrespect; -- touching that leads to relief of tension -especially
sexual -is the highest form of male bonding & an intensely personal event shared
between friends. It is a blatant lie to assert that men do not appreciate
the beauty of the male body (which is why muscle & fitness mags are full of
photos). Most (as in the MAJORITY) of men have a
great aesthetic appreciation for masculine traits. Men are also drawn
towards personal characteristics that are admirable in other men - such as
courage. Such traits are infectious among peers in a group & a respected
guy who befriends a peer & pulls him toward the 'close inner circle' knows that
over time - it's possible that the friendship will take on sexual dimensions
based on mutual respect -like those discussed above. However - most men find the
act of analsex a completely disgusting concept.
Based on testimonies like that above & their number, - it is my
hypothesis that in the natural state - adolescent men will intimately
bond with their peers. The intimacy is based on an unspoken set of rules
regarding the equality of both men in the act of coupling & that mutual
affection is shared in an atmosphere of masculine respect & acceptance.
Those who do not meet the mandate of a masculine gender role within such
groups are ostracized - because accepting them & their difference
represents a threat to the core values of the group - by the implication
made nonverbally by accepting "the sissy". The specter of gender
non-conformity sends up a powerful warning flare; -& anal-sex is the
brightest warning signal: A message that threatens a fundamental &
instinctive moral imperative & a core masculine identity.
The sissy is cast-out because a "sissy" represents a personality that
leans near cowardice and a potential to bend toward actions that will
threaten the group's core identity. "We don't have 1 sissy because we
don't want more to follow." - Such philosophies are not discussed
out-loud - but known instinctively.
Therefore - a group of sissies that bands together becomes the icon
of 'the loser group' - a group of pseudo-men who have lost the
connection between their balls & their consciences; - At least as far as
the regular guy on the masculinity-bell-curve is concerned. And,
where do you find the largest collection of "sissies & pseudo-men"
today? That's right: The "Gay-Male" community. And what are the
WELL-KNOWN & ADVERTISED CHARACTER TRAITS of
the GAY MALE community? X-gender confusion, drag,
butt-sluts, queens, & crowned by guys who advertise 'sex' with other
guys (with a preoccupation with Anal fetishes). All this
social-scat is wrapped in the highest levels of Sexually Transmitted
Diseases of ANY demographic on the planet!
The "loser group", in the eyes of the observing Boy-Scout-Gang, - has
lived up to the very expectations they had of the sissies they rejected
in the 1st place. And the TRAITS, STEREOTYPES & STIGMAS of the "Loser
Group" are now the characteristics to be avoided in the name of
"masculinity". And what is one of the traits of the loser group?
Male/male intimacy & sexuality; - (mixed with faux-pussy analFetish). And
society - which is generally N0T composed of analytical minds - fails to
separate the (2) components.
The DISASTER, -- the LIE - that cascades into the public psyche is that
male/male intimacy is a "gay" community exclusive. What the g0y
men's movement has taken the pains to point out is that male/male
sexuality is NOT exclusive to "gAy"; - Butt the "gAy" male culture is
the culture that DESTROYED the noble image of male/male-intimacy by
anally-raping it, smearing it with feces & putting it in drag; -And then
worshipping that loudly degraded icon THEY CALL "GAY SEX"! And sadly,
because there are "men" involved, -society believes the perversion
to be representative of ALL male/male physical intimacy; -& because the perversion (& many variations) spread
diseases & glorify shoving objects into body orifices that were not
naturally designed to accommodate: There is a huge amount of money to be
made by those who market to the perversion/s (thus promoting &
And guys who have not had the ability to see this gradual shift in
paradigm from the bird's eye perspective (of time's passing & the numerous
interconnected facets of the social evolution of the 'gay' phenomena) -
are confused by the "in their face spectre", the conflicting messages,
their own masculinity + the fact that many of them do find
masculine men attractive on some physical level. Where the "gay
male" image has gained loud media, - the natural male bonding process in
the 'gang' is now confronted with a loud, contrary LIE
that asserts a "heterosexual norm" & that male/male intimacy is part of
the "gay thing".
male/male physical affection has been effectively stigmatized & smeared
with feces, effeminacy, arse-sex & a connection to the word "gay". The
natural affections to touch, hug, hold, cuddle & nudge to a loving mutual
climax have been put into a box of terror that asserts that doing so will
make a guy part of "gay culture" - a term which carries a
tremendous amount of baggage -well beyond mere same-sex intimacy!
At this point in time, we believe that the term is beyond redemption and
g0ys offer no apology for
G0YS believe it is time to make a
distinction and an emotional appeal for men to accept the warm male
affirming parts of their innermost beings without being ashamed that they
are capable of loving other men (in the fullness of love's dimensions); --
While N0T being deceived into thinking that their affection
needs resemble anything like showcased in the moral-sewage of "gay-media".
In simple terms: It's possible to have a BrokeBack-Mountain experience
WITHOUT the ButtFukk'n!
The key component of a g0y relationship involves disclosure & acceptance of
several facts. These are not issues usually discussed openly, -- but
nonverbally assumed fundamental truths.
Sexual release is a need. This is true for men. For men, this is
true. And if you are a man, you know how TRUE IT IS.
Are there any questions? If not - then why do we tolerate people discussing this topic
as if it is not true - as if sexual release was an option? Granted -
there is probably a small percentage of the population to whom this form of
OCD to-self does not affect. Perhaps physical or genetic reasons
spare some from the inevitable need to pump out copious amounts of man sauce
through a seizuring penis, -- but most men begin to lose their ability to
think of anything else -if they are hindered from regular
ejaculations. And by "MAN", --I mean a HUMAN MALE JUST 3
seconds PAST PUBERTY...
Once again, fake, formal religion has failed humanity miserably
in this regard. Truth is the last thing Father Ropehyder wants you to know,
because if you realized the truth - you'd know what Father Ropehyder is doing
in those extra-long morning showers that gradually deform the bar of soap into
an acute "(" shape.
The reason that teenagers get morning wood is so that the
foreskin will detach from the glans to facilitate intercourse. Men are
programmed for sexual release in their teens. But, - one
of the 1st messages "churchianity" tells men is that their sexuality is
shameful & their need for regular release is "sinful". It's my belief
that if you attend the Church of Kellogg, etc -- you need to tell Elder Penisprude that his preoccupation with
preventing undocumented male ejaculation is a sign of mental illness.
If that doesn't work - simply exit
permanently. Religious hypocrites deride the truths Gentile g0ys know
by instinct. The unspoken lesson of the circle-jerk is that guys need to
get-off & it's normal, natural & nothing to be ashamed about. It's
"a guy thing". Denying
it is simply a mark of self-hatred, ignorance -or both.
Just as it's easier for a 3rd-party to tickle you than for you to tickle
yourself; -- Having a 3rd party give you a helping hand in the sexual release
department feels infinitely more pleasurable than using the 'self service
pumps'. So - your best friend
"J" circle jerks with the bois
& is the kewlest guy on earth who likes wrestl'n with you too. Last time
he stayed overnight - you wrestled & then he got you pinned. Once pinned
he began to tickle you so long you thought you were gonna have a stroke, -
& he occasionally gently groped your balls while making jokes; -& the next thing you
knew you were hard as a rock. Big, bad "J" then used his circle-jerk
skills to slowly stroke you until you were shoot'n ropes halfway to the
headboard & having your nutt so hard that that you thought your curled
toes might break
off. Afterward he busted into a gentle massage all over ya because
he really does love the ground you walk on (- & he got off on getting you off).
Next time you'll be sure to get pinned earlier -- unless of course - you
somehow manage to pin big "J" & then give him a taste of his own
medicine! Or- maybe you'll just get naked & cuddle into a good
cock-fight. It's a guy thing.
Of course - fundamentalist-type religion/s (always on patrol to make sure
that nobody has an orgasm without the official paperwork signed) goes about
trying to thwart such exchanges by suggesting that "masturbation in
general is a sin" -
to begin with. However - what they call "hoe-moe-sex-shu-ality" is
labeled (by them) as an
'abomination that is punishable by death & will send your soul straight to
hell - praise the Lawd!' Of course - they'll add that masturbation is 'only' a
(because they're all doing it themselves -so must downplay it)! Well - let's consider that
posturing & pour a little damnation back in their erection, - eh, direction:
If "Hoe-moe-sex-shu-ality" is sex with the same gender; -- Then isn't
masturbation "ho-mo-sex-ual" too - being sex with the same gender? After all --
ARE the same gender as yourself, right? Am I the only one who
smells the bullsh1t of hypocrisy? I suggest that this
is the argument to kick 'Pope Muhammad' between the crotch with. The
smoke of smoldering brain circuitry is a pleasing aroma before the Lawd
- as they try to justify how yanking one's own winky is less "homo" that
fondling that of another guy; - especially when the word "homo" means "the
same" & you don't get any more "the same" then when you are fondling
Of course, the point is not to villianize self gratification - but to cause a
sense of personal despair among those who teach that same-gender-attractions
are "abominable" - while they themselves cannot stop jacking off! Once the
"youth leader" realizes he's an "abomination" because he jacks off
(& he is the same gender as the dude he's jack'n...[being himself]), -- he'll
be open to legitimate alternative views that get him off the hook as well.
- Most guys agree that the emotions they feel in regards to sexuality are
not well accounted for in the anecdotes of society nor the classifications
society has for "sexual orientation". In general, the biggest LIE is
that the Bi-sexual (ambisexual) part of the population is a small minority.
Over +53% of the population experiences Same Gender Attractions! The next lie about
Bi-sexuality is that people who are - feel the same degree of attraction for
men & women. Actually - the levels of attraction vary tremendously and it is
often more of an issue of individual traits that determine the force of
attraction. This is why you occasionally hear about a guy who has always
been "straight" suddenly falling in love with another guy. People who
experience this type of event are often at a loss to explain "what is wrong
with them". The answer is: Nothing. Last time I checked +53% was not a
minority! However - for people in the 1-5 range on Kinsey's scale -- they very
often feel that what they have experienced attraction-wise does not fit into
the social sex-boxes of "straight, bi & gay". They're right.
Society doesn't know the truth about sexuality because it is afraid of the
truth and the mass media is run by people -- generally terrified that other
people will find out that they swing both ways. People who accept the lies
promote the lies. Meanwhile - lots of guys are in a state of confusion
because they discover they are getting aroused around their good looking male
buddies in certain situations. Guys who carry these emotions silently within
them often suffer terribly with unmet needs, questions & guilt thrown at them
by the likes of religious fundamentalists. Meanwhile the specters of a guy half
in drag & half in leather - with his penis up another guys arse - waving "Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
guyths" has less than zer0
appeal. Most men who feel real love toward other men do not relate to the
conventional wisdoms of the day about sexuality matters & who they are! They
love other dudes but they do not relate to the spectre of "gay" at
all; -& furthermore find many "gay"
stereotypes, stigmas & fetishes to be completely contrary to their moral center.
We know the feelings - hence this website!
Part of the g0y paradigm places heavy emphasis on
RESPECT. First, I'll give you an example of a widespread
symptom of DISrespect: You're with some
male friends on the road and you drive by an attractive woman. Heads
turn, jaws drop and a comment is made; "I'd like to
*FUKK* her!". See the symptom of *DIS*respect?
I'll turn it on it's ear to make sure you understand: You're out for a
walk. A car goes by with several guys in it and you hear one of them
yell, "I'd like to *FUKK* Him!" -
speaking about you. At that moment, do you feel like a person or an
object? On a scale of 1 to 10, how much respect do you feel the person who
yelled the comment has for you - as a person?
G0YS NEVER see another person as a mere sexual
object[.] When a g0y sees a totally studly bro - the reaction is: "I'd like to
have that dude in my circle of close friends!".
attempts to make it so. G0YS aim for long-term relationships that place
friendship as #1. The most powerful affirmations we have are to love &
be loved. When 2 people hook up to have a naked sheet staining party and then
forget each others names because no attempt is made to continue the
friendship: What the hell is that about?
G0YS never disconnect their heart from their penis. You'll notice that
the heart beats hardest just after the orgasm; - & keeps on beating until
you're dead! So it should be with your friendships! Omnia Vincit Amor.
People who see others as objects for mere sexual gratification are the same
ones who make the porn industry a
success. Fukk'n sociopaths... And they're everywhere!
Making Love Man2Man:
|When giving details on this
subject from the g0y perspective, - it is very common to hear from men who
have had the experience & never been able to articulate their feelings
[for the mere reason that the current paradigms on sexuality lacked the
terminology or even a model held up as an ideal]. Once they see
'g0y' described - there comes a moment of clarity where their sexuality
suddenly makes complete sense for the first time; -& in addition to
embracing the concept of g0y - there is a simultaneous & complete
rejection of the ill-fitting (unisex, ambiguous, anything-goes)
Broke-Back Mountain almost
got it right. Where it seriously dropped the ball & became a "gay agenda film"
instead of a story about buddy-love - was during the scenes that hinted of the
way sexual interactions between the two guys occurred. From the perspective of
a guy who has 'broken other guys in' regarding their first experience to climax
with another guy -- I can tell you that Analsex is as close to their thinking
as broccoli is to a Great White Shark's. The BBM script was written by a
woman; -- & what did she know about M2M other than what is in gay pubs? After all
-- those things claim to be the 'word' on M2M. G0YS know they represent
a minority of loud perverts; -- Meanwhile +50% of the male population shrinks back
& thinks "Man, I hope nobody ever thinks that vulgar sh1t
about me!". BrokeBack - as written was like fine juice with a solid hint
of snake-sh1t in it!
If the first love scene had been done right - it would have been like this:
Once the 2 guys were in close quarters & bedding down, one would have gained
the courage to start slow-rubb'n on the other - probably back, neck & shoulder
area. Smalltalk about "hitting the spot with the massage", friendship &
"where it feels good" would gradually fill the silence as 2 things occurred:
The heart rate of each guy would go into his aerobic zone & the skin of each
would begin to flush; - While externally the demeanor of each would stay
even-keeled (but maybe just a little bit nervous from the internal sexual
tension). As each guy grew more comfortable, - clothing would gradually
come off in the name of "the massage" or being "too warm", etc. It
wouldn't be a frenzied thrashing to undress. That would be too obvious &
frontal. Slow gentle contact with gradual disrobing could easily
take around half an hour! The event proceeds respectfully on equal
footing. As clothing comes off & more skin is accessible -- sexual
tension continues to climb & conversation becomes less frequent. Each
shifts his attention to the physique of his buddy & each uses their closeness to
slow-caress & admire musculature, shape, & the feel of more skin; - while
observing physiological responses: [Increased breathing. Pounding
heart. Perspiration. Goose pimples & Erect penis]. All those traits that
are considered secondary male sex characteristics: Solid jaw, razor stubble
Adam's-apple -& the like are the focus & enjoyment of each
guy during his encounter. As skin calls to skin, the two gently move
together in an embrace pec2pec, penis2penis. Legs intertwine & each guy can
feel the physical responses of his buddy's maleness from his breathing to the
little movements each penis makes beside the other as they move closer to
ejaculatory inevitably. Thousands of body hairs gently lock & unlock - moving
across short tracks of skin before meeting other hairs & pausing once again. Hands & arms slow caress as faces gently rub, - & each
guy softly vocalizes in response to his level of stimulation. Naked legs
& bare feet slowly seduce each other; - each guy feeding off the signals his
buddy is sending - responding in kind. Climax occurs nearly at the same
time - as the responses
from each guy's genitals are felt by the other & used to keep each into
sync. As a guy's prostate loads with jizz,- his intense
response tells his buddy that he is going to cumm, - & the increased pressure
& movement in the groin area coupled with all the muscle contractions inherent
just prior to a male orgasm cues the same. Both men embrace
tighter as their mating penises rhythmically vomit out the contents of their
balls into a warm pool of man-sauce between them; And each guy mentally
imprints how good his buddy helped him to feel & how tight their
friendship/love really is. Going to sleep gently
cuddled up & draped across each other is usually the anticlimax; -With round-2
happening in the early morning just prior to getting up.
THAT'S the scenario that should have been in BrokeBack -
stretched out over 15-30 minutes of total film time; -Because - generally - that's the way it
actually happens. Nowhere does a
proctologic exam with the 'erect pelvic-digit' occur (except where guys have
bought into the 'gay-porn' paradigm & spent some time being indoctrinated &
talked out of their natural
Having written all that - a large percentage of men reading this will
relate completely. Some, in the "gay-male" community will have their epiphany
- realizing for the first time why they never "fit in". See, based on polling
- about 10%-20% of the gay-male community does N0T engage in anal-fetish.
Many of those also relate to g0y & are now reaching the conclusion that the
only reason they have been part of the gay community is because there was no
alternative label, - nobody else to better identify with. Well, now they
You guys nailed it! My 1st C2C experience
with a guy (Tom) was when I was a teen & a member of the swim team
- during early summer break. We were using his family's camp near a
lake & decided to share the bed in his bedroom rather than mess up
the other beds in the cabin. We ended up doing a late night swim
& it was kinda cold in the area at night because of the low
Well, we slid into bed & he was still cold to the touch & I
was warm. He stuck his cold foot on my leg & commented how
warm I was already; -- & I took the opportunity to ask "if he
was still cold" while wrapping my arms around his frigid upper
body & sliding him closer to me (I was giving off heat like a
campfire or something). Well, the guy really was cold &
shaking a little, -so when he felt all that warmth pulling him closer,
-he went with it & in seconds he had his arms around me with his
cold hands on my back & his cold legs wrapped around mine. I
rolled up so that he was literally on top of me, pec2pec -balls2balls
-as I slowly rubbed my warm hands over his frigid back. We were
each wearing a towel wrap around our waists -secured with a strip of
velcro. And then he said something like. "Man, even my nuts are
I felt like there was something about the way he said it that was more
than just a comment & something in my head told me that I might
never get this chance again - so I told him to "lift up for a
sec" as I slid my hands to his hips. He lifted his pelvis & I
tugged each towel wrap loose & pulled them off us -leaving them on
the far edges of the bed. Tom lowered himself back down &
his cock 'n balls rested on mine (& yes -they were cold). I
reached over & turned the light off & told him that he'd
probably warm up soon & try to relax. Well, it didn't take
him long to warm up. Pretty soon his pulse was racing hard & his
breathing was ramped up a notch as his stiffening dick grew & his
warmed balls relaxed away from his body & rested more heavily on
top of mine. Neither of us said a word & just slowly -ever
so slowly snuggled -enjoying all the skin to skin contact. Tom
was in shape & the muscles beneath his skin were easy to feel as I
rubbed him from neck over his back to bare arse. He was
massively hard -but I noticed that slow strokes on his lower back
& arse were causing his monster cock to momentarily harden even
more & making his abs slightly tighten as well as the globes of
his muscular arse. It felt like I had a river of jizz stopped up
in my dick -ever so close to breaching containment, -but the best part
of the experience was Tom's reactions.
See, it wasn't like we hooked
up to get-off. What has happening to him was slowing getting him
off & instead of trying to make it happen -- he was captive to it
& it was such a turn on -that he couldn't control what his
responses were. And it was feeling him - slowly losing control
that I found to be the biggest turn on of all. A quiet but frantic
groan with a tightening of his hug, was accompanied with both arse
cheeks turning to steel as he pressed the base of his balls hard into
mine, & his frantic dick vomited out the 1st of a string of
ejaculations that he expelled with such urgency that it felt like he
wanted to crawl out of his skin. Feeling it happen to him made
me cum like a racehorse along side. And then -feeling the
intensity let up so that he was able to bask in the relief -even while
intermittent contractions made his dick occasionally dry-heave; --Again
-it was the focus of the experience. The best part of getting
the other guy off was the shared empathy of the act. His
experience mattered the most -& in coaxing an orgasm out of him -
I was satiated too.
And that's my point. It's always been that way with a buddy. Empathy
made the act totally rock & empathy afterwards reinforced the
level of respect & compassion he felt radiate from me. It
was always a "guy thing", -NEVER a "gAy thing".
There was never a hint of gender-phukk or that what we had as friends
resembled in the least bit the relationship with women.
Masculinity was never treated as if any type of compromise had been
made -because none had. Nobody had been "Bitched". And the
innate aversion to arse-phukk'ing was central to this atmosphere of
friendship, respect & intimate masculinity. The combination
was friendship mixed with a love of the masculine w. intense respect
for the manhood of the man, - while never ever confounding M2M
intimacy with anything resembling (or even hinting at) using a guy in
proxy of a woman! It's that extreme level of respect for
masculinity that frames the M2M relationships I've had where
testosterone turned tender. The "gay" community simply
doesn't understand how repulsive "it" has become to lots of regular guys
-whether ambisexual or 100% into men. Like the g0ys say:
"Men don't bitch men!", & that sentiment is beyond
Inevitably there will be some people who shake their heads & insist that "g0ys
are simply gAys in denial". I like to line those voices up with the ones
who insist that: "g0ys aren't really 'gAy' because we've never done the
butt-nasty". Doing so is a little bit like putting a humidifier and a
dehumidifier into the same room (let 'em fight it out). Of course
- you could always read our
Some men who are strongly "anti
same-sex affection" are that way because they're afraid that a
relationship with another guy will result in them being perceived/treated
in the same manner that they perceive/treat women. They simply can't
adjust their thinking to accept that sexuality & friendship can be (&
should be) combined. And because they mentally connect sexuality with
disrespect, - they perceive an intimate relationship with another guy as
necessitating imbalance & disrespect (a lie exactly like much of the
gay-male community promotes with top/bottom - dom/sub pigeonhole schemes