Absolutely No Apologies to Peddlers of Degradation, Disease & Death!

Captain Ahab had to have his whale.  It only cost him his life & the lives of those around him.  Likewise, there are large numbers of so-called "men" who declare themselves "gay", who - "have got to have their TAIL"; -- Butt what they really are --are the enemies of what the word "gay" originally meant:

gay adj 
     1: bright and pleasant; promoting a feeling of cheer; "a cheery
            hello"; "a gay sunny room"; "a sunny smile" [syn: cheery,
             sunny]
     2: full of or showing high-spirited merriment; "when hearts
        were young and gay"; "a poet could not but be gay, in such
        a jocund company"- Wordsworth; "the jolly crowd at the
        reunion"; "jolly old Saint Nick"; "a jovial old
        gentleman"; "have a merry Christmas"; "peals of merry
        laughter"; "a mirthful laugh" [syn: jocund, jolly, jovial,
         merry, mirthful]
     3: given to social pleasures often including dissipation; "led
        a gay Bohemian life"; "a gay old rogue with an eye for the
        ladies"
     4: brightly colored and showy; "girls decked out in brave new
        dresses"; "brave banners flying"; "`braw' is a Scottish
        word"; "a dress a bit too gay for her years"; "birds with
        gay plumage" [syn: brave, braw]
     5: offering fun and gaiety; "a gala ball after the
        inauguration"; "a festive (or festal) occasion"; "gay and
        exciting night life"; "a merry evening" [syn: gala, festal,
         festive, merry]

Most people do not realize that the original definition varies greatly from the modern use.  Interestingly enough, this also occurred with another term in Germany during the early half of the 20th century.  Let's take a look at another word whose image was forever changed by those events:

Swastika \Swas"ti*ka\, Swastica \Swas"ti*ca\, n. [Also
   suastica, svastika, etc.] [Skr. svastika, fr. svasti
   walfare; su well + asti being.]
   A symbol or ornament in the form of a Greek cross with the
   ends of the arms at right angles all in the same direction,
   and each prolonged to the height of the parallel arm of the
   cross. A great many modified forms exist, ogee and volute as
   well as rectilinear, while various decorative designs, as
   Greek fret or meander, are derived from or closely associated
   with it. The swastika is found in remains from the Bronze Age
   in various parts of Europe, esp. at Hissarlik (Troy), and was
   in frequent use as late as the 10th century. It is found in
   ancient Persia, in India, where both Jains and Buddhists used
   (or still use) it as religious symbol, in China and Japan,
   and among Indian tribes of North, Central, and South America.
   It is usually thought to be a charm, talisman, or religious
   token, esp. a sign of good luck or benediction. Max M["u]Ller
   distinguished from the swastika, with arms prolonged to the
   right, the suavastika, with arms prolonged to the left, but
   this distinction is not commonly recognized. Other names for
   the swastika are fylfot and gammadion.

Hmm!  How many people today think of "a charm, talisman, or religious token, esp. a sign of good luck or benediction" - when they see a swastika!? 
Don't they usually think of images like the following, instead:

 

Now why do you suppose that would be?  The symbol didn't kill anyone?  No.  It took a little tyrant from Austria and a whole lot of powerful, image-laden PR (that exploited the formerly benign swastika, among other things)  to get people inmasse' to commit acts like those shown above. Ironically ... Hitler didn't commit the atrocities shown.  People, - who mindlessly followed Hitler while he spoke great swelling words, - committed these acts.  People who were willing to be led by their feelings are guilty of the holocaust.  And the swastika? -- An unredeemable image, - forever soiled by association with human avarice.  So negative are the images now associated with the symbol that anyone visiting this page -- simply seeing the symbol displayed, -- might mistakenly assume that this site is some sort of pro-Nazi web! 

Well, this page is not about the swastika, but about what can happen to a symbol over time given enough bad press.  This gets me back to the opening definition:  The word, is "GAY"... & like the swastika, -- "GAY" no longer means what it originally did.  As a matter of fact, -- many people have been so stigmatized by the "fallout" of the modern meaning surrounding, -- at least part, --the word's association, -- that they visualize the following images:

G.  A.  Y.
Got  AIDS  Yet?

"GAY" has, in many social circles, been made almost synonymous with "DISEASE".  Now why do you suppose that would be?  Besides the fact that almost every "gay" fund raiser is about fighting sexually transmitted diseases; --Let's take a look at the CDC's figures on AIDS infection (for example) in the US for a clue:

AIDS Cases by Exposure Category:

Following is the distribution of the estimated number of diagnoses of AIDS among US adults and adolescents by exposure category. A breakdown by sex is provided where appropriate.

Exposure Category (CDC figures) Male Female Total
Male-to-male sexual contact  ??? 420,790 - 420,790
Injection Drug Use 172,351 67,917 240,268
Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use ??? 59,719 - 59,719
Heterosexual contact ??? 50,793 84,835 135,628
Other* 14,350 6,519 20,869

* Includes hemophilia, blood transfusion, prenatal,
and risk not reported or not identified.

The first line should be a wake up call!  Male to male contact: 420,790 cases!  This is as much or more than all other causes of infection combined (& please notice that the 3rd leading cause is a combination of [male/male sex -or- IV drugs])!  But, is the phrase "male/male sexual contact" accurate?  Not really.  Why?  Because there is a form of sexual contact particularly good at spreading HIV (article).  Ironically, it's also a major vector for AIDS spread by male/female sexual contact.  If you want to spread disease, & really let it explode into society in epidemic proportions, - anal"play" is the fetish that spreads plagues.

You'll notice that the gender of the person on the receiving end of this act is not disclosed in the picture.  This is because the gender is irrelevant.  In the chart above: 135,628 cases of AIDS were attributed to "HETEROsexual" contact.  What you are not told is the FORM the "Heterosexual contact" took.  People may assume, because of the label "HETEROsexual", that it was penile/vaginal sexual contact.   This is unlikely for (2) reasons.  1) More men are likely to use a condom in penile/vaginal sex to prevent pregnancy; And, 2) contrary to misconception <pun>, the vagina is fairly hostile to HIV taking hold, where as the anus will welcome it readily!  Most women infected by HIV became so by participating in anal intercourse, or repeated unprotected vaginal sex with an infected partner (who almost always contracted HIV via anal intercourse or *IV drug use).  The playground acronym for AIDS: "Anally Injected Death Sentence" is ironically, accurate!  AIDS is seldom spread in other ways. *Note the asterisk ('ass-triks')<pun>!

Today's lesson: Being same-sex attracted  - does not spread AIDS.  Anal "sex" does.  Based on the chart -it does so at least +400% more often than the next statistical bullet!   Like the swastika, the word "GAY" has been devastated; -- Not by men who love men, -butt by men who participate in the same form of sexual contact that male rape takes, -- a form of sexual contact forbidden in most of the major religions & by almost every civilized society from the Jews to the Greeks!

(Yeah, GREEKS -- the society to turn male/male love into an unparalleled art history lesson - named anal penetration as of form of moral turpitude)! 

    
(No-Stigmas?)

The growing group, that ASSerts that anal-sex-play is "gAy", is perhaps better identified as the "Butt Phuck Tyranny" ("BPT" or "BFT" in some circles).  We also refer to them as "ASS-CLOWNS" (ARSE-CLOWNZ).  It's not "gAy" as much as it simply doesn't give a dAmn about the recipient of this debasing form of pseudo-sex.  Furthermore, Ass-Clowns will stop at nothing to spread participation in this fetish to the ends of the earth <pun>.  The ad images shown are examples of mass e-mail marketing, - several e-mails that a junk mail account set up specifically to monitor "gAy" e-mail collects daily.  Look & you'll see that every such e-mail promotes a single theme: Anal "sex" = "GAY".  Ass-Clowns will even expend energy combating the simple truths this website shares with others!  The "ButtPhuckTyranny" AKA: "Ass-Clowns" will call us "oppressive" because we point out that anal-sex is indirectly killing people.  Ass-Clowns will call us "homophobic", despite the fact that we don't limit the message about the dangers of anal sex to "gAy" men.  The Arse-Clowns will try to obfuscate & minimize (see insert to the right) the dangers of "anal sex" -- despite the fact that the figures on the chart above won't budge for them.  Ass-Clowns talk about "condom education campaigns", butt it becomes obvious over a decade into such campaigns that either the campaigns do not work, or the fact that condoms DO fail (& that people don't always use them), - accounts for the  figures on AIDS charted above!  AIDS may be the ultimate bane of the typical Ass-Clown, butt the fact is that "anal intercourse" (if it can even be called that), is a leading vector for virtually ALL sexually transmitted diseases & at levels many times higher!  This would be like using your swimming pool to route sewage; -- Having regular swimming parties, & then becoming angry at your guests for becoming critical or refusing to attend!  Ass-Clowns are not only immoral ... they are often willfully evil.  The mental specters created in the public mind by images like the ones shown above are the reason why g0ys do not adopt the "gAy" persona, label & do not want to be ASSociated with that culture[.]  Because of Arse-Clownz & the damage it has done to the reputation of same-sex relationships, -many people do not know to draw a distinction between "gay" & "anal", -- any more than the average person thinks to separate the swastika from Hitler! As a result, g0ys have come to realize that the term "gay" - in the mind of the vast majority of the public - has come to mean "ANALSEX PARTICIPANT". That stereotype may not be true for you, but if you wear the uniform - people presume that you represent what the vast majority of people who loudly wear the uniform assert.  Therefore, the term "gay", which originally, merely implied "same sex attracted", -now carries with it a much broader set of implications.
G0YS believe that the term is unredeemable at this juncture; - Hence we reject it.

HIV "Homofascism"
Butt Phuck Tyranny

At least one American gay publication, Magnus of San Francisco, has recognized fascist tendencies within contemporary gay activism. Writing in the April 2000 issue, AIDS dissident Alex Russell sees similarities between the bonding processes among HIV positive gay males and German Freikorps members:

Many attributes of the HIV Homofascist Movement (or HIVism) resemble those of Fascism and the psychology of the Freikorpsmen: an authoritarian personality; extreme emphasis on the masculine principal, male dominance and blood brotherhood bonding; exclusive membership of an elite in-group; and the fetishization and aestheticization of suffering, self-sacrifice and death.

Freikorpsmen made war a way of life where desiring production becomes death production. Many HIV Blood Brothers see the war on AIDS as a way of death where the Freudian pleasure principle and the death drive become indistinguishable. The Swastika armband has now been replaced by the HIV positive tattoo and the red ribbon.

There is no loyalty without hatred: passionate membership to the HIV Homofascist in-group can fuel hatred for the out-group (the HIV-negative outsider or HIV non-existentialists) -- seeing AIDS dissidents as a threat and obstacle to their blind HIV Belief.

- Michael Phillip Wright

In their own Damned Words:
"For by your words you will be justified; -& by your words you will be condemned." - Rabbi Yeshua Ben Adam

The following is an excerpt from a book written by a +70 YO, well known "gay activist" - now HIV+
This excerpt is included because the old Arse-Fukk'r articulates precisely what g0ys have been saying about those who push the arse-phukk: 
They're complicit to murder.

Fag's Confession of Culturally Promoted Homocides:

"Does it occur to you [fellow arse-fukk'rz] that we brought this plague of AIDS upon ourselves? I know I am getting into dangerous waters here but it is time. With the cabal breathing even more murderously down our backs it is time. And you are still doing it. You [fellow arse-fukk'rz] are still murdering each other. Please [fellow arse-fukk'rz] stop with all the generalizations and avoidance excuses gays have used since the beginning to ditch this responsibility for this fact. From the very first moment we [fellow arse-fukk'r] were told in 1981 that the suspected cause was a virus, gay men have refused to accept our [fellow arse-fukk'rz] responsibility for choosing not to listen, and, starting in 1984, when we [fellow arse-fukk'rz] were told it definitely was a virus, this behavior turned murderous. Make whatever excuses you [fellow arse-fukk'r] can to carry on living in your state of denial but this is the fact of the matter. I wish we [fellow arse-fukk'rz] could understand and take some responsibility for the fact that for some 30 years we [fellow arse-fukk'rz] have been murdering each other with great facility and that down deep inside of us [fellow arse-fukk'rz] , we [fellow arse-fukk'rz] knew what we [fellow arse-fukk'rz] were doing. Don't tell me you [fellow arse-fukk'r] have never had [arse-fukk'r] sex without thinking down deep that there was more involved in what you [fellow arse-fukk'r] were doing than just maintaining a hard-on.  I have recently gone through my diaries of the worst of the plague years. I saw day after day a notation of another friend's death. I listed all the ones I'd slept with. There were a couple hundred. Was it my sperm that killed them, that did the trick? It is no longer possible for me to avoid this question of myself. Have you [fellow arse-fukk'r] ever wondered how many men you [fellow arse-fukk'r] killed? I know I murdered some of them. I just know. You [fellow arse-fukk'r] know how you sometimes know things? I know. Several hundred over a bunch of years, I have to have murdered some of them, planting in him the original seed. " - Larry Kramer

Isn't it Romantic? - N0T!

Next they'll be a fetish where a person puts a partially loaded gun into their mouth & orgasms as the trigger is squeezed ... or maybe if the gun is inserted into the ass, the scene will become "art imitating life"?  Here's a number for you: According to the CDC, condoms fail about 2% of the time during anal phucking.  On a 360 day year, assuming only 1 screw a day, that's 720 buttphucks (360x2 partners).  720x2%= 14 condom failures. Since it only takes (1) failure to spread HIV, that's 1300% overkill.  Last time I saw an overkill factor like that it was tied to the nuclear weapons program.  Have 1/14th of a nuclear war & everyone is still dead.  Ironic how the penis resembles a missle....
Buttphuck Perils:
(Requires REAL-A player...)

The image on the right is a brief synopsis of the problems that are commonly seen in people who are the recipients of anal*sex*.  Click it for more detail. We dare you to.

It's clear that disease is only part of the butt-phuck dilemma. There are a multitude of physical ailments that are a direct result of participating in anal-fetishes and those with pre-existing conditions soon find that minor health problems have turned into full-blown nightmares because they decided to take up anal*play*<sic>.

It's clear that disease is only part of the butt-phuck dilemma. There are a multitude of physical ailments that are a direct result of participating in anal-fetishes and those with pre-existing conditions soon find that minor health problems have turned into full-blown nightmares because they decided to take up anal*play*<sic>. Yes. I did repeat that paragraph -because so many people seem to forget it instantly the next time they discuss the AssFukk paradigm; -Speaking only of STI's & forgetting that tearing somebody's ass out is also a serious medical peril that AssClowns promote.

G0YS simply point out the FACTS that the BUTTPHUCK promoters want to hide, ignore or belittle. And they'll call the likes of us names for simply pointing out the truth! We offer no apology.

Because insurance companies are terrified of the butt-phuck boys calling them "homophobic bigots"; -- they usually don't list anal-sex as a high-risk activity that should have it's own high-risk rough-ryder.

Ass a result, everybody gets to pay for completely preventable conditions - now covered by insurance when buttpluggerz need rectal/anal treatment (& they constitute the #1 claims group).  Phuck'n Arse-holes!

Soft Personalities:

In psychology, people are sometimes classified based on their willingness to accept a suggestion.  In the minds of susceptible people, a slogan repeated enough times is taken as truth:  "The earth is flat", etc.  Lacking either the willingness or faculty to question blanket statements about reality, these people live in a fantasy world made of gossip, myth & half truth; -- And they cannot understand why the people around them succumb to the likes of HIV.  Mix in some arrogance & a promiscuous mindset & these people have the same effect on society as a plague infected rat with diarrhea who lives in the kitchen among the buffet set.
Every now and then, an e-mail arrives from the likes of these to scold G0YS on our posturing, & extol the so-called 'virtues' of the forms of sexual fetishes we detest.  Often, bold statements are made asserting how some group in the distant past put the likes of anal-play on a social pedestal.  Indeed, there have been groups in history who built monuments to such fetishes -- right before their proclivities wiped them out (a premise being proven in Africa at this very moment).  See, 'soft' personalities can't form the essential thoughts to question their preposterous assinsertions.  I.E: What happens to the society that lacks antibiotics, - that also engages in activities that easily spread the likes of syphilis, gonorrhea & other STD's?  Ask any gay guy who's over 49 where most of his adolescent 'friends' who came out as "gay" after Stonewall are now.  Ask those still alive why they didn't become HIV+ too (the answers will all have 1-thing in common: "ASS-CLOWNS" DROP LIKE FLIES FROM DISEASES that those who DON'T BUTTPHUCK DON'T GET.)  Hmmmm.

Killing the messenger? (It's a gay thing...)

Organized gay empowerment movements emerged during the 1960s and 1970s in major cities in the USA and Europe. These movements coincided with the heterosexual revolution in most Western countries that were more accepting of greater sexual freedom. However, the sexual revolution and gay empowerment movements also coincided with the introduction of HIV into several gay populations during the 1970s. The development of gay bathhouses where sex contact with many different partners during a single visit was routine created a perfect setting for transmission of sexually transmitted infections. Once HIV was introduced into such a venue, explosive spread occurred. With increasing global mobility (jet travel) that became increasingly available during the 1970s, HIV-infected MSM from major cities such as SF, NY, and London rapidly spread HIV to MSM networks in most other major cities throughout the world during the 1980s. By far, one of the worst affected MSM populations has been and continues to be among MSM in San Francisco. The picture of the SF Gay Men’s Chorus was taken in 1993 - those dressed in black, with their backs turned, represent those who had died. Today, all their backs would be turned because the obituary list is now 47 names longer than the chorus roster. As of mid-2006, only four men are left from the original 1978 Chorus of about 200 members.  SF Chronicle file photo by Eric Muse

They'll Never 'get it' (Because they choose not to)...

"And just as they did not think it was worthwhile to be having [or, keeping] God in [their] true knowledge [or, consciousness], God gave them over to a reprobate [fig., debased] mind to be doing the [things] not proper, -having been filled with all unrighteousness, sexual sin, wickedness, covetous desire [or, greed], malice; full of envy, murder, bitter conflict, deceit [or, treachery], maliciousness; gossips,  back-biters, God-haters, insolent persons, arrogant boasters, schemers of evil [things], disobedient to parents, foolish, untrustworthy, without natural affection, unforgiving, unmerciful; -Who having known the righteous judgment of God, that the fate of those who do these things is death, not only are doing them, _but_ they are also approving of the ones practicing [them]." - [S/P]aul

Now - most members of the Butt Phuck Club (male &/ female) will immediately raise an objection to the above quote because it mentions God ("is religious"). They raise this objection because the focus of the passage above is absolutely accurate: Describing those who are a law unto themselves without conscience.

"And, according as they did not approve of having God in knowledge". 
Καὶ καθὼς οὐκ ἐδοκίμασαν τὸν Θεὸν ἔχειν ἐν ἐπιγνώσει

And, because the first part is a bullseye; - So is that which follows.  Which, is why g0ys.org is N0T an emotional appeal for those people to come to their senses. We consider them a causality of their own indifference.  G0YS.org is an appeal to help stop those currently on the journey there - because of their keeping of bad company.  We're also an alternative viewpoint to the "package deal" that is immediately often ASSumed to be part of the moral constitution of anyone who wears the "gay label". 

In the general view of society, - calling yourself "gay man" is like stepping in dog-shit. There may be a shoe - between it & you, - but when the air settles down -a smell lingers 'round.  It's the stale odor of something rotten (as described in the opening box quote). Need evidence?

It's not the fact there's same gender attraction. G0YS have no problem with that. +60% of the population experiences SGA. The problem is the fact that the gay male culture has welded the icon of anal-sex into such close proximity with the term "gay" that we do not think it is feasible to try to redeem the term. Metaphysically: GAY is to ANAL, what SWASTIKA is to NAZI.  

Thousands of years of innate social conditioning in many cultures often welds the impressions imposed with predominant traits -to an entire family. Many people have been exposed to the concept of bringing pride or shame upon "the family name".  It is a well understood & accepted principle -especially in Asian cultures.  However, the gay-male community seems oblivious to the principle. They don't understand that "tolerating everyone" brings within their numbers those who live in such ways as straining tolerance, - many unworthy of it because of the results (say "results") of their actions & philosophy's.  And these individuals also call themselves "gay". With such a flock of dirty-birds intermingling so comfortably with the "gay-male community"; --they ultimately are responsible for the repulsive stigmas that became connected with the term.  "Gay" has "been disgraced" by its own lack of moral discernment.  And the gay-male community -which was originally about M2M sensuality; -Has now been hijacked by chicks with dicks, dudes in drag & Adam with an arse-fetish.  If my last name was "Hitler", -I'd change it.  Because, you see - some Nazi named "Adolph" disgraced the Hitler name during the early 1900's.  "Gays" don't seem to understand this well established social principle, -& so they mindlessly tolerate every destructive fetish that knocks on the "gay-door" (simply because there is a gender-nonconformity perceived in it)! We need no longer coddle such willful ignorance. We think; --Therefore we reject "gay" as a self-identifier.  

We are fully aware that there are men who identify as "gay" - who reject anal. They're called "g0ys" these days. It's a word for better classification. Because any "gay guy" who explains (over & over & over) that he's not "into buttholes" - is like a man who whistles during a hurricane: Nobody hears & those in the event don't take the time to listen. On the other hand, g0ys - by our posturing against butt-play & gender-fukk, generate an emotional response so fast among those who hear the description - that the boundary sets like psychological concrete.  Lots of men who can't the stand the stench around the term "gAy", readily gravitate to the term "g0y".  Need evidence?  

And the growing "tolerance movement" that accepts "everything gay & male"? That is described in the last sentence of the quote that this box opens with. ("gay" affirming churches - you too).  G0YS aren't against SGA. We're against acts that lead to death/disease/demise (such as analsex).

It's not a matter of "a little distaste".  We think AnalSex comprises a tort against humanity. It is immoral because it spreads disease like the plague. We appeal to 3000+ years of legal history on the matter. Them?

I have also made the observation that on the list of prohibited dietary animals associated with the Law of Moses, -a substantial percentage consist of animals that are coprophagous (in common terms, sh1t-eaters). Under Hebrew law, contact with feces was 'tow-e'bah' (usually translated as "unclean" or "abomination"). The same prohibition is true regarding carrion (dead things). From observation, it seems more than mere coincidence to me that Moses' Law forbade eating, (& often mere contact) - with those things, -& creatures that had contact with those very things. Among such were:

  • eagles/vultures - carrion eaters

  • rabbits - coprophagous

  • dogs - coprophagous

  • swine - notoriously coprophagous (so much that even Muslims today cite that as the reason they do not eat them)

  • & the prohibited sea-creatures (bottom-feeders & filter feeders) particularly stand out...

    • Even today, red-tide is a major threat to sea-based fishing & the animals that help remediate it are primarily those that Moses said were off the list of edible creatures! Most "raw-bars" have signs posting the warnings of "food-borne illnesses"; -- And for good reason, -as diseases caused from contaminated seafood rank among the most serious -with devastating long-term effects!

I find it amazing that an ancient people (Jews) who knew next to nothing about microbiology would have a law that seemed to recognize the natural order of things & by doing so - provided protection by prohibiting activity that would bring them into peril from things that they had no knowledge of the workings! I believe that God gave the Torah to Moses; -& it's observations like this that indicate a level of intelligence at work far beyond that of men living 4000+ years ago!  Even from a symbolic perspective, the curse laid on the Devil in Genesis relegated him & his "off-spring" to the existence of being a death (by-product)-eater. "And Jehovah God said to the serpent, Because you have done this, you -cursed above all beasts, and above every animal of the field. You shall go on your belly, and you shall eat dust all the days of your life."   If you consider the general description of the "curse", it covers a lot of "things" other than the common symbology of a "snake". Virtually all of "biology's bottom-feeders" come to mind - from bacteria to worms while almost always directly or indirectly causative of the untold misery that plagues<pun> the planet (from pestilences to parasitism). Coincidence? You say.

Homophobia & Natural Selection:

Here's something to consider: Homophobia is not as much a fear/hatred of men who love men, - but is a result of natural selection wiring the brains of surviving offspring against behavior that puts populations in peril -- such as anal-based promiscuity, & female promiscuousness.  This explains why male virility is generally, - socially bolstered, butt loose women & passive/anal men are loathed as 'sluts'.  It's a double standard that is the result of many generations of natural selection. 
As covered above, a society that engages in widespread behavior that affects reproduction adversely (& mortality rates affecting reproduction), will be devastated by such behavior.  Individuals in those populations who abstain from those behaviors (& those that are so influenced to abstain) survive to pass their instinctive mental 'engrams' to their offspring. Over several generations, these polarizations will influence society.  I.E: Many people dislike or don't care for lima beans.  Seems an oddity, yes?  Since taste is subjective, why is it that lima beans seem to be disliked on a much wider scale than say, corn?  It turns out that lima beans (especially white lima varieties) contain an substance that inhibits the enzyme, amylase.  Amylase is the enzyme used to digest carbohydrates.  In a society challenged by famine, interfering with digesting carbs could literally mean the difference between life & death.  Who would tend to live?  People who disliked foods that blocked digestion -- disliked foods that inhibit amylase, -- would survive to have offspring more often than those eating foods that inhibited digestion.  Hence, over time, societies who have histories of famine would tend to genetics that wired them to dislike amylase inhibiting foods -- such as lima beans.  
Likewise, people in general consider anal sex to be perverse, but religious moirés do not account for this widespread perception (Religions tend to distort the truth of such matters, being built on the primitive mind & using myth to explain things. A genuine faith would be founded on the likes of truth, understanding, & law ... but I digress.).  Like a genetically directed dislike of lima beans affecting large sections of society, a general distaste for behaviors that tend to kill people & eliminate children would naturally (used in the literal sense of the word) become integrated into populations.  Because natural selection is such a blunt tool, populations tend not to understand the reasons 'why' they have certain cultural beliefs.  It's just a feeling prevalent in the society. The "A" in 'gAy' may as well stand for "Anal" -- as society as a whole believes that & knows by instinct that "Anal" sexual practices are invitations to cultural disaster (natural selection itself has made the observation).   It is this precise mechanism that makes a new distinguishing subset of "gAy" society a necessary one: 'g0y'. 

G0Y is Natural.  GAY is Not!

For years, discussions of "homosexuality among animals" has been used by researchers to point out that it is a natural phenomena in nature.  It is indeed well documented that many species have members that pair-bond with the same sex.  However, something else has also been recognized:

Indeed, some researchers, notably Tim Clutton-Brock of the University of Cambridge, would say that "true" homosexuality -- if strictly defined as male anal penetration by males who show no interest in females -- is virtually unknown among wild mammals.

And here is the dirty little secret that the BFT would like to suppress.  Just as the religious right is proven to be composed of liars when they argue that "homosexuality is contrary to nature" - in light of well researched documentaries clearly showing otherwise; -- So are the "anything goes" anal*ists* groups shown to be omitting keys facts when they try to justify "homosexual" anal*sex* by appealing to animal models!  Lying voices on both sides?  It's what g0ys have been pointing out!  The truth is indeed a narrow path! 
Anal Kills.  Nature Knows.

G0YS have essentially removed the "A" from gAy.  From observation & personal experience, there are more g0ys, than gAys (read that statement a few times) -- and many men who once thought of themselves as 'gAy' are discovering the 'g0y' movement & flocking to it in droves...because it's what they've been all along.  Read the e-mail we get here & you'll see this is without debate.  The fact that many guys have their first sexual experience with another guy (almost always FROT; --very rarely ever anal,) is evidence to the fact that g0ys are all around us our entire lives (Because if Jonny cuddled you till you came in junior-high, -- he's still able to experience those same feelings today [pay no attention to the camouflage ... eh, - the female, with him now]).  It's just that social stigmas against 'gAys' by coincidence, oppress 'g0ys' via those who may not yet be aware of the distinction between men who are tender on men, vs. men who arse-phuck men.    Obtuse minds cannot see the distinction, but to those whom it applies, it's as clear as empty space.  If disease statistics are used as a measure of morality, - then g0ys are among the most moral segment of the population, while 'gAys' constitute the opposite.  Therefore, the "A" in 'gAy' also may mean: "Antagonistic" to life.  For those offended by this analysis, I suggest that you consult the CDC-table above & argue with it.  (Perhaps the figures will change for your whims ;-) 

For an excellent expose of what sex is: [CLICK].   

Harsh &/ Homophobic?

Some (very few) have suggested that this website is too "hard" on 'gAy' men or perhaps even homophobic.  Being authored by mere men, it is likely that there may be some imperfections of tone, -- & where it fails to console the wounded, --we apologize without hesitation!  Yet I have to wonder how much of that alleged "hard-tone", is the conscience of the critic echoing a subliminal "amen!"...
 Being men who appreciate & even love other men, the accusation of 'homophobic' is demonstratively without merit.  And, - a charge of being "homo[phobic/hating]" makes our point for us about our critics' bias. See - we shun analsex & acts that effeminize men. Anyone who claims we're "homo[negative]" because of our posturing, - is admitting that they consider male to male intimacy to include analsex & effeminacy. And because our posturing indicts them - they accuse us of being 'homo[negative]'. So, our critics do the best job of proving our point when they accuse us like that; - & clue in anyone who is discerning - of that fact.
 But what about being "too hard on gAy men"?  Many men who are 'g0y' - may have previously identified themselves as "gAy" (or "bi") -- for lack of more appropriate terminology, -up until reading the content here.  If you read our mail, you will see that this is the case more often than not.  These g0ys always indicate that "this" is how they "are" and always have been.  They often feel like they were alone in their sexuality and did not fit into the 'gAy' culture.  Now they have discovered 'g0y', -- a better term to use.  Once they thought they were "gAy", (or 'bi') but now they realize that they were 'g0y' all along!  So then, the "A" in 'gAy' -- as g0ys see it, -- never actually applied to them ('gAys' who were 'g0ys' all along).  You see, if "gAy" ONLY meant being a guy who is into other guys, it would be different.  However, there are too many negative stigmas attached to the term. How many people do you think would "straight" identify if the media supported the notion that most 'straight' people were into anal sex with multiple partners ALL the time?  How many people would wear a "straight" label if the word was generally associated with filth, feces, fetishes & disease -- as a rule of thumb?  G0Y men find the basic social-psyche surrounding the term 'gAy' to be similarly distressing.  I.E: Most emotionally healthy adults love children & want to see them grow up happy, safe & protected.  However, despite the fact they LOVE CHILDREN, few would choose the term "PEDOPHILE" to describe themselves, -- despite the fact that the term is technically accurate.  That term has likewise been destroyed by it's association with child-molesters.  After all, how many people who love music & describe themselves as "AUDIO-PHILES" are accused of wanting to "molest" home entertainment systems?  The social use of a word often produces a spectre in the mind's eye that has little relationship to the actual, original meaning of the word.
So, are "we" too harsh on 'gAy'.  One only need look at the statistics here to see the obvious answer.  The cultural differences between "gAy' & 'g0y' are the differences between life and death, - but this is no secret as the 'gay' community itself provides some of it's own harshest criticism: Condemned by it's own writings! A recent article in XY was written by a young guy observing the ambiguously-gay world around him.  I read it & realized that g0ys abound; & what this young man was feeling was the shallow-pettiness of the 'gay' lie that stinks like rotten arse.  If we g0ys don't act, then the only thing these awesome younger dudes are gonna find are the disease ridden lies of a culture all diseased except for a few statistical long-shots, & preprogrammed media mouth-pieces who can do nothing but chant the mantra of a failed social experiment into shallow thoughtless immorality done under the guise of 'liberation' (perhaps like the Nazi's "liberated" Europe).
 I for one love these younger dudes, - & many g0ys themselves have kids whom they want to be comfortable to live a life more open & honest, -- & without the stigmas associated with being "gAy". If you could read some of the private feedback to this site!  There are lots of younger dudes in serious pain -- not because they are hott for other guys ... but because they HATE (I MEAN HATE PASSIONATELY) what mainstream "gAy" media portrays men who love men as being.  I get e-mail saying things like: "Holy Phuck! I'm so relieved that I'm not a fAg!  Been thinking about ways to end my life because I didn't know how to deal with these feelings for my bro's without seem'n a queer".   
G0YS have some suggestions!  And "coming out" does not need to be one of them (Especially if you're dependant on someone else - like parents)!  Why?  Because people who 'come out' discover they're among 'gAys'.  If you're "outed", make sure you come out fighting as a g0y ... not gAy.  That'll shut the pie-holes of the know-it-alls (& probably get you some major support from all kinds of people -- some of whom are bound to be g0y)! 

Homophobic?  Nah ... we're men who luv men, head2toe.
Anti-gay? As 'gAy' culture is perceived to be: anal, petty, shallow & selfish: We ABSOLUTELY detest it! 
Butt, at the pinnacle of this open detest is the practice of "ANAL-PLAY"; -- And whether done by M/M or M/F couples -- g0ys abhor it.  The good news is that it's so easy to stop that particular practice! Ignorance does form a foundation for excuse -- at least as far as the matter of "intent" is concerned.  However, once enlightened, the moral shape of the person becomes self-evident.  So, do g0ys have friends who are 'gAy'?  Sometimes...  And we wish with all our fiber that they'd get the "A" out of their thoughts for g00d...

 

Unfair Stigma?
Basis of Communication 101:

If you want the world to stop calling you berating names - then stop calling yourself by the same names:  "We're here; -We're "Qu__r" <What was that?>; Get use to it!"
OK. We're used to it. You made your point. You're Queer. Your words.

We constantly hear from guys who claim to be "gay". They tell us that not ALL "gAy" men are into Anal sex. We don't deny it. The problem is (pay close attention): That the GAY community in general ASSerts that "AnalSex in the GAY-WAY". Just like the principle above: If you want society to drop an offensive stereotype - then you'd probably be well suited to reject it first. And "REJECTING IT" doesn't mean "TOLERATING IT". It means "REJECTING IT".

Having spent lots of time in the guys' locker room; - I'll confirm that when guys are berating "FAGS" ... what they're really talking about are the social stereotypes (psychological baggage) that the term "GAY" WILLFULLY CARRIES.  And the most offensive stigma the term WILLFULLY CARRIES is an ASSociation with the same form of assault that male rape takes: ANALSEX.  And the overall picture that the term "GAY" promotes from within it's own ranks - is viewed by the majority of men to be a willful debasement of masculinity.  And WHO is sending these messages in the loudest possible formats? It's the GAY-male community itself!  If you want the world to cease associating your group with berating imagery; -the stop portraying yourselves with that imagery.

And, of course, the gay-male community won't speak out against self-deprecating imagery, -because in the name of "tolerance", the gay-community has created a safe-haven for morally reprehensible people who promote their deviance as an "evolving cultural standard of behavior".  In legal terminology - this is called "being complicit". It is the bedfellow of cowardice & deserving of the shame it has embraced. The folly is obvious - as that same "culture of tolerating anything" has the highest levels of sexually transmitted diseases of any demographic on the planet!  What other culture would tolerate a subculture within its ranks called "Bug Chasers"? 

The "STIGMA" of "GAY" is well deserved because "GAY" embraces it's own demise by "TOLERATING" virtually every decadent act that "gay" people dream up.  Anyone who dissents is labeled "intolerant".  If this was simply the opinion & assertion of g0ys, it would be merely a prejudice. However, anyone who has spent time moderating any of the g0ys group forums know that we receive an astonishingly large amount of "gay-centric" e-mails/messages that themselves push the very decadent "gay stereotypes" that have been mentioned here. We regularly receive scathing messages from pro-gay supporters that flame g0ys for our utter rejection of analsex & other acts that we see as dangerous, demeaning & damn-unmasculine.  These "pro-gay messengers" continue to confirm that it is the gay-male community itself that is responsible for pushing an agenda of disrespect, disease & death.  If that's what "gay" asserts that "gay is", then so be it. That's them; --Not US!

G0YS ARE PROUDLY INTOLERANT of the ANALSEX-PARADIGM & MASCULINITY-DEBASING, MORAL-DECADENCE extolled from within the GAY MALE COMMUNITY. G0YS are SO INTOLERANT, that we have segregated ourselves by adopting the DISTINCT TERM "G0Y" (spelled with a zer0) that is precisely defined from its 0RIGIN, - & not subject to definition-decay as any slang term [IE: "GAY"] (that comes to mean whatever time & implication might want to eventually ASSert). 

The lie (left) - a supposed depiction of men who luv men,& the stigma it creates - is offensive to g0ys, & the basis for the majority of society's prejudice against M2M relationships.  G0YS denounce such stereotypes without apology!  Whoever creates such advertising does not love men; -- Quite the contrary.

Notice the text at the bottom of the ad that reads: "DECEPTION IS THE KEY". Then notice the text at the top that implies that this is his FIRST GAY SEX.  Notice the color images.  This is what the Butt Phuck Tyranny promotes as "gAy".  Society, in general, believes it.  Zyclon B anyone? 

"Truth in advertising" at the 'Pride Parade' in San Francisco. (Right)

It's THEIR message...
 THEIR message...
 THEIR message...
THEIR message...

Why Be Nice?

In continues to ASSTONISH me that some people seem the think that g0ys should be "nice" to people who push, support & silently-tolerate this sort of vulgar abuse of humanity.
Damage, disease & death have always been the criteria for criminalizing an activity. So, (ergo), -by it's very nature, the arse-phuck is a CRIMINAL act.  
"Adults consenting" to engage in a criminal act are criminals! 
The act of the arse-phuck has made it clear that the public always pays the price for "private criminal behavior". That's why when an arse-phukker tears his arse out or gets an STD while "privately consenting", -that the health & life insurance rates rise for the PUBLIC (looks like something wasn't so 'private' after all).  
When it's immoral: What starts out as private behind closed doors, -becomes public knowledge on the hospital floors. 
G0YS have made a quality decision not to coddle such vulgar, criminal mindsets!  G0YS don't do it! We don't tolerate it quietly! (Because if you do tolerate such foolishness, -history teaches us that some people will begin to believe it's OK & actually promote the practice! Hello? Sound like any "group" you can think of?)
Not all gAys phuck arses. True. But calling yourself "gAy" makes you guilty by association with the culture that has framed itself with criminal practices & routinely perverts public policy to allow what should be outlawed! If "gAys" need to defend the arse-phuck as "gAy-sex", then "gAy" is a movement with criminals as it's spokesmen.  Supporting criminals is a crime called "aiding & abetting"! That's "gAy"!

G0Y isn't "gAy-light".
G0Y is about men of good conscience who call the arse-phuck what it is & don't tolerate the amoral rhetoric from those who disguise callous indifference as "tolerating diversity". 
WTF!   

G0YS.ORG is a site devoted to men who love men, but who want nothing to do with anal-penetration or the filthy (sh1t-stained), effeminizing stigmas associated with it.  Many men who, for the lack of a better term, once described themselves as "gAy", are now adopting the term "G0Y" (spelled with a ZER0) as a better description of who they are & how they choose to love other guys.  Many guys who started into the gAy movement & were "recruited" by the BPT ("Ass-Clowns") find our site to be a call back to their original erotic center.  Please do return!  Above all: Please spread the word that a new movement (one that is ironically, very old) is taking place in male/male relationships.  'G0YS' - We took the "A" out of "gAy" - denouncing the likes of: Anal, AIDS, & Apathy - just to name a few!

We are the G0YS!  Join us!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Open Entire Site in Frames: