It's
not only cut guys who need to be particularly mindful of their buds -- but
anyone who wants that level of intimacy. "Gay literature seems
preoccupied on trying to make the sewer into an erotic place for a date. As far
as I'm concerned: Sewer-rats are for target practice. As a g0y, -I'm such
a clean-freak that I don't even want bloodhounds to know I'm coming. Yeah
- I'd probably do AquaMan without much reservation.". But it's that
intense connection that I want in the after-math. That feeling of loyalty
wrapped in empathy that says, "Yeah, Bro - I've got your back - because you
matter to me."...THAT feeling is so important to have --especially after
your bud has just surrendered his willing wad to your skilled lips &
tongue. It all starts with a mindset that allows others to get close &
one can't underestimate the value of basic, unrelenting personal hygiene! |


|
"Cursed
is he who removes his neighbor's boundary marker!"
- Moses
"The Law
is Spiritual..." - Saul/Paul
While the quotation from Moses above is most
likely dealing with issues of property; -- the bigger issue of BOUNDARIES is
covered by the quote as well. Paul - writer of much of the New testament -
was probably drawing on that principle when he penned: "All food is
clean, but it is wrong for a man to eat anything that causes someone else to
stumble. It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else
that will cause your brother to fall. So whatever you believe about these things
keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the man who does not condemn
himself by what he approves." - Rom 14
Paul's message was that it is wrong to do things that cause your 'brother' to
transgress his own conscience. In simple terms: Don't move your neighbor's
BOUNDARY Marker. Because Paul's teaching was about the new-found liberty
in Christ's covenant -- the message was that a person's own boundary marker may
be moved to encompass more of what life has to offer. What was once
restricted by ritual - is now open pasture! Notice that each person is at
liberty to move HIS OWN boundary marker based in good faith as to what is
legitimate "open territory". However -- that teaching is
balanced with the primary tenant of Christ's theology: "Love works no ill toward
his neighbor...". Paul makes clear that it is possible to condemn yourself
by what you allow if what you do violates the tenant of neighborly love.
Paul's example was food. Brilliant! You see: you don't get any more
intimate with something than to eat it & make it part of yourself!
So: What's to learn from a 2000 year old lawyer & a 4000 year-old
Egyptian-raised-rebel? Well, as covered in great detail within the
G0D-HATES area; -- the section of
text Moses penned in Leviticus forbidding men laying with men has a powerful
legal delimiting clause: "AS HE LIES WITH A WOMAN". Since Moses's law also
gives instruction regarding HOW men are to lay with a woman (throw the
Karma-Sutra away) -- the prohibition becomes very specific: Anal-Sex is
absolutely forbidden[.]
G0YS
hold to the theological model that argues -using the Scriptures - that Torah specifically forbade anal-sex and that lax, indiscriminate men twisted that
prohibition beyond the letter & lawlessly expanded it (with sloppy exegesis
& outright mistranslation); -- to allege that same-gender affections were
the forbidden. G0YS point out numerous Scriptural citations to support our
[gender-blind/anti-anal] posturing; -- but more importantly, g0ys point to the overall
themes & purpose of the law in the Old Testament + the Law of Christ in
the New. G0Y'S [gender-blind/anti-anal] position on the issue of sexual
affections should make any "Christian" or "Jew" swallow hard
contemplating seriously the citation from Deuteronomy 19 above! Oh, and the most
scholarly
Jewish Rabbis agree with the g0ys
(How ironic is that)!
Some claim that the specific prohibition is based on mere
religious dogma. However, if you check out the modern statistics that track the
spread of sexually transmitted diseases -- you'll find that Anal-sex is +5000% more effective at spreading STD's that all other forms of sexual
contact! And, because it is so much more dangerous -- societies that
tolerate the practice are soon consumed with sexually transmitted plagues.
(God doesn't send the plague as some religious nuts claim. But the increased risk of plague/s is the reason the
Torah forbid the act in the 1st place!).
Moses wasn't the only law-giver to forbid men playing the
"female role". The ancient Greeks -- the culture that left behind a legacy
of man2man same-sex affection in their historical, visual artistic record; --
They also outlawed anal-sex! Mull that over in your mind & consider how
different their culture was from modern "gay male" moirés (which almost
exclusively pander to anal-fetishes)! The same gay-male community that
loves to point at the Greeks -- would be incarcerated for moral decadence by that same Greek culture! An ironic fact, yes?
Ultimately, the grand folly is an attempt to violate natural law by ignoring a
boundary marker and compounding the foolishness by coercing others into
disregarding the 5000+ year old boundary marker as well! Of
course - the majority of men know by instinct that anal-sex is unnatural &
unsanitary. It takes a repeated message that says "Disregard your natural
aversion" to wear away at the consciences of men weak-willed enough to follow
the herd. From the standpoint of psychology: Only about 1%-5% of any
population consists of leadership personalities. In a culture that sends
the message: "GaySex=AnalSex", - only 1%-5% of exclusively-same-gender-attracted
men will have the personal fortitude to unconditionally reject it while NOT
conforming to the ASSociated culture.
The rejection of that act & others that attempt to make a man a proxy for a
woman is the predominant trait - THE LINE - that separates g0ys from gAy-male
culture in general. Men who discover their inclinations are those
described here - need not "embrace diversity" - if that "diverse behavior"
violates their consciences. And because g0ys' posturing is one that divides
based on actions that involve torts (whether intentional or not), we are vocal
about our posturing. This causes many men who are in the "gAy male"
community to accuse g0ys of being "judgmental". If by "judgmental" they
mean that g0ys dare to call certain behaviors "reckless disregard"
& therefore criminal in act & immoral in intent - then I'd have to say
that we're guilty as charged: Guilty of using our good sense of reason.
G0YS encompass men
on all part's on Kinsey's scale. It isn't sexual orientation
that determines if a guy is a g0y - but if he holds to the
core values of the philosophy. Even straight (Kinsey-0) men who
understand & accept the philosophy are technically - g0y in a
philosophical sense; -While straight guys who promote anal-sex
practice (whether M/F or M/M) are not. G0YS believe that there
is no physiological difference between anal-sex with a man or a woman.
Both acts are held in equal contempt. |
|
|
THE
LINE:
The line called "g0y" is embraced by nearly all men when they hear the
philosophy articulated; -At least those who haven't injured their own
consciences by delving into anal-fetishes (whether M/F or M/M). The LINE
represents the moral high ground where men need not be concerned about being
humiliated by other men who may find them attractive & need not be shamed
because they fall into the +60% of men who experiences various degrees of same
gender attraction. The line called "g0y" cuts thru the lies & separates
the light of friendship & respect from the darkness of meaningless hookups &
disposable people. "G0Y" loves masculinity & therefore would never even
consider trying to reshape "Danny into a Donna". G0Y treats the other as
if he was priceless.
G0Y REALITIES: An
editorial Contribution
As a Kinsey-6 G0Y, my own life has been characterized by a respect of my male
peers & esteeming masculine principles. Raised in a conservative,
fundamentalist-connected home - I have seen the best & worst parts of the
religious right & had to make my own decisions based on facts & reason as I
discovered that there was no way I could ever truly "fit in" with
fundamentalists because of my sexuality. However, the passing of time
revealed to me in no uncertain terms that I wasn't the only guy with deeply
concealed affections. However, my mannerisms were always controlled & I
adopted early the philosophy that I should become the same kind of person that I
desired. I became a gym-rat in my early teens & as a result - developed
friendships with a number of male athletes & a few other gym rats. On the
surface - my friendships looked a lot like most others. In private is
where the variances occurred. How many other guys were doing the same
things - I have no way of knowing, - but I suspect it is much more widespread than
generally realized.
Before I go too far giving generalities, let me explain some of the
specifics. Being a Kinsey-6 male teen is like any other I suppose --
except you have to figure out what to do with a peaking sex-drive resulting from
high hormone levels. Being above average intelligence, I discovered early
on that with some planning - it would be possible to get much more intimate with
the guys I found attractive without ever threatening the guy's masculine sense. Being into the gym scene, I became knowledgeable about
physiology, working out & MASSAGE as a recovery
tool. Combined with horse-play (unstructured wrestling) & a private,
basement
bedroom -- I became extremely close to a number of guys.
After you've
become good friend's with a guy & he knows that you don't mind massaging him or
the physical contact -- most will gladly cuddle up to get the knots hammered out
& generally be rubbed on because it feels great (sore muscles or not).
Each & every friendship started out with a "handshake" & progressed to whatever
level of depth the other guy would generally acclimate to.
As a Kinsey-6, I found the effeminate behavior & the stereotypes of "gay men' to
be distasteful to the point of being repulsive. I also believed that if anyone had a right to hold such
contempt - it was me. After all, I was on the far end of Kinsey's scale - and
not only did I not walk or talk anything like Dame Edna, - but I found
the concept of men scoping my buddies with the goal of arse-phucking them to be
so offensive as to make me contemplate violence against anyone who'd harbor such
disrespect in their hearts -- not to mention openly express it. Yeah, I
"hated" stereotypical FAGS - not because of their orientation, but
because the ones who were "visible" didn't seem to consider themselves quite
"male"; -- & the so called "masculine gays" were up to their necks in
reputations of arse-sex. Being vocal against "arse-pokers", my peers
intrinsically assumed I was not "gay" -- despite the fact that I never had a
girlfriend hanging on my arm. I wasn't cruel to the few guys in the school who
acted like their sisters. I simply avoided them & wondered silently how
they could be so disinterested in monitoring their own body language when it
caused them such general rejection. It sucked being them...
I had more on my mind: My buddies. I had this growing mass of guys whom I loved
in every dimension of the term. However, my deep emotions were always regulated
with self control when around groups of people & my friends also kept greater
distances in order not to send signals that shallow minds & gossips might turn
into some "gay" rumor. Ironically, open displays of "gayness" among us
became fodder for jokes. Two guys who "everybody knew weren't gay" could
create a cacophony of laughter by walking down the hall holding hands.
What was more than ironic was that if I happened to be one of the guys holding
hands with a "str8" buddy: A Kinsey-6 who is assumed "str8" playing it "gay"; -&
nobody sees the irony of what is in front of them!
Friendship building progressed to deeper levels slowly (intentionally) & out of
the mass of guys I loved deeply as close friends -- there were some who
succumbed to the affection early on. One was a "tough guy" named Sean -
who grew up in a single-parent home & never knew his dad. He had a sharp
wit & would pull his fists in a second to defend his "reputation". I
outweighed him by a good 25 lbs sophomore year & despite my superior "I could
kick your arse if I wanted to - size", I thought his cute smile & rugg ed little bod coupled with his cocky attitude was adorable
("micro-stud") & I couldn't get pissed off at
the guy - even when he ran off at the mouth (before we were friends). He
happened to be the brother of another good friend of mine - so it was
inevitable that we were gonna become friends. The first time I ever horsed
around with Sean - he got a raging hard-on that announced itself loudly through
the contours of his sweatpants when I got up off from him. He was sooo busted -
yet instead of a scowl - I gave him a smile & a hard wink from my left eye that
only he could see (there were people in the other room & the door to his room
was open some). With a single facial expression - I had told Sean that he
was completely accepted & my discretion formed an invisible bond of trust
between us that lasts till this day. I wasn't going to waste any time
setting up our next encounter after I saw his erection. That weekend I
invited him overnight - after the game at school. To shorten a long story:
We ended up wrestling, then showering & decided to watch some TV. The TV
was angled so that it was in a corner & faced my bed - not easily viewed from
the guest bed - so Sean was beside me in his undies with a bunch
of pillows propping up his head. After about half an hour, he seemed to
have fallen asleep (and I wasn't staring at the TV screen any more when there
was a better view so much closer & in 3D). I
turned it off with the remote & pulled the blankets down under us so they could
be used to cover up. Sean seemed to come to with a "Huh?". I told
him I was gonna try to get some sleep & he could stay in my bed if he wanted -
because it was better than the guest bed, "but I sleep in the raw - if that's OK
with you".
I pulled the covers up over us & proceeded to kick off my
shorts. My heart was pounding - but went to the next level when he said
"Me too..." & kicked off his shorts.. So there we were - buck-naked in the dark
under the same set of covers in the same bed. I was actually shaking a
little because the level of sexual tension was so high. I don't know where I got
the courage - to this day I don't know where - but I slid an arm under his
torso & rolled him over face down on top of me - pec2pec,
cock2cock. He was
pretty compliant - probably in shock that I'd be so forward, - which made it
easy to pull both of his arms gently behind his back as I held him at the wrists
& wrapped both legs around his. "Last one to cum wins...", I whispered to him.
And that's when his whole body began to stiffen & shake some as he shot - with deep throated whispers that would have been the
yells that some men emit as they ejaculate - if he'd used any voice other than
panted air. His legs were restrained by mine as his muscular arse's
reflexively alternated - tightening & relaxing his glutes - making his tense restrained
body slowly writhe in my hug as he emptied his nutt all over my stomach in one of the most
intensely wet
orgasms I've ever felt. It was one of the most awesome things I'd ever
experienced with another guy & I dumped my load mere seconds after he had
started his. The most awesome thing about the event was not that I popped
with a hott guy ... but that the hott guy I popped with had such a good
experience himself. For the next minute or so - his dick would
occasionally twitch out the last few streamers of jizz in a diminishing set of
mini-orgasms that caused him to reflexively stiffen his arse & exhale in little
bursts that let me know what he was feeling at that moment. During the
same refractory period, I let go of his wrists & commenced to giving him a slow
appreciative massage from neck to buttocks that was an endless series of
punctuated hugs. For a guy who always seemed to have
a wise crack -- he didn't say a word.
I knew too well what was going on in
his mind but I had already figured something out: When a guy jacks himself --
it's a guy jacking a guy. So, if you could have your own cock in your hand
pumping out a wad (without being a fag) -- then it was possible to do another
guy without being a "fag". I had made the connection that "fag" & "arse-phuck"
were one and the same because that's even what the gay-pubs made
clear. I massaged Sean into a coma that he awoke from a few hours later -
still on top of me. As he awoke, so did I -& I gave him a big
lung-deflating hug. He rolled off me & asked me not to "tell
anyone" what had "happened". It was then I shared with him the
profound thought I had arrived at earlier. A guy
jacking himself isn't considered a fag - so being a "fag" isn't about guys
getting each other off ... but guys PHUCKING each other in the ARSE. Since
that didn't happen in my bed & wasn't ever going to -- it wasn't a "fag thing", but a
"buddy thing". And "No, I'm not telling anyone our personal sh!t...so
relax...". Over the next few years - I had that same conversation
several times (all with different guys). Laying it out like that was like
turning a light on. "FAG" became an acronym for "Fuck'd
Arse Guys" & "GAY" meant "Got
AIDS Yet?". Because none of us did the former,
none suffered the latter! Yeah, at the time we were intense in our
opinions & how we perceived self image. Most of us are more laid-back
today - but the basic beliefs about respect of masculinity - core 'g0y
philosophies - still remain intact.
Fellatio:
There's been a bit of confusion among some g0ys as to our position
on fellatio (BJ'n). It's really the same principle as anything else: "All things are
permissible -but not everything is beneficial." Acts like "Anal*" are too
perilous for a number of reasons & cannot ever be considered "safe"
(because the act itself is a source of physical trauma -as the lower GI tract is
NOT a sexual organ -thus not designed for treatment as if).
"But what
about 'oral'?" Statistically, from an STD perspective: 0ral is about +5000% safer
than anal (& because g0ys don't do anal, - nor do g0ys do guys who do anal - that's
2500x safer)! Generally, men prefer to give oral to circumcised guys as
opposed to uncut (but don't panic if you have a hood). It comes down to a
matter of perceived cleanliness. Why? Because intimacy with anyone
always has risk. In school, "lice checks" were done 1-2 times
annually. Lice could be spread by close contact -nothing even considered
'sexual'. So, slow pleasuring a guy with your mouth is obviously a means
to convey not only, eh - 'lice', but things not so nice.
I.E: HP-Virus
can mess you up. The 'wart' is a sign that a guy is a carrier ... but in
the age of medicine -Dr. Deceiver removes warts from the nads of carriers &
thus removes the visual indicators that someone is an HP-Virus carrier.
Damn inconvenient to get on your nads; --But magnitudes worse to get in your
mouth. Arse-Phukkerz are the #1 carriers & spreaders --followed by the women
who 'do them'. And HPV is merely one of many perils. So, the message
is: Doing a good buddy has some risk (how good is that communication?);
--And, doing a stranger is just plain stupid! Use mouthwash immediately
before & after if possible. There is also a vaccine available.
As people, we depend on our senses
as an indicator of a guys relative health. It isn't always accurate -- but
one can surmise that if a guy generally is clean than he is less likely to allow
situations to arise where his personal hygiene shortfalls become perilous for
others. One g0y wrote: "Being a clean-freak, -The only
time I'd blow my uncut buddy was immediately after showering, swimming or
Jacuzzi." Another writes: "The 1st time I blew a guy, it was my buddy Dan on his 16th
birthday. We were at the lake & I swam under the dock & while he floated
face up on the other side - I pulled his lower body toward me & worked his speedo's down over his hard on. After stroking him to the point where I
thought he was probably as clean as the crystal lake were were swimming it, -I
went down on his uncut mantool for the full 15 seconds or so - until he jizz'd a
river from the sensation. His fresh mansauce wasn't ever an issue in my mind:
What I wanted was a totally clean dick to work it out of -- not something that
had been sweltering between his legs & wrapped in a ripening foreskin - for even an hour.".
I've had other guys
tell me the same thing. "Totally clean is the rule." One g0y suggests: "It's one of the ultimate acts of loving kindness a guy can do
to another. However, it's one that I expect to come from intimacy. One way
to clear the "STD" issue is to ask the question in such a way as to preserve the guy's
pride no matter how he answers. Questions like: "Because I'm into dick2dick, it
really isn't a big issue; --But have you had STI's or anything in the past or are still
being treated -- that we might want to wait to clear up before doing
more than some rod-rubb'n & ball-bonding?" If you're with another g0y, the
answer will be negative most of the time. If the guy has recently dealt
with something -then the safe position is to know specifically the contagion
factor & not go there if it's still an issue. Products like
ClearShield that form a monomolecular, invisible glove can substantially reduce skin borne
issues like yeast, jock itch, hpv & other sub-dermal source conditions. If the
guy has been on antibiotics to deal with a condition, -the best advice is to
know for sure that whatever he had - is now clear (I knew a guy who got NSU from
his wife
shortly after his wedding -although it's rare). You don't want to mess
with anything that could wreck your health[.] Sticking with g0ys (NEVER
with Arse-pounders -not even those who are willing to go on the C2C-diet w. you {but would play in an arsehole
if given the chance} ) is the safest way to engage. And remember -- this
shouldn't be a 1-nite-stand type of interaction. With g0ys, "sex" is never
casual. It always has meaning & is the "super" in the glue of friendship/s.
Staying clean is tremendously important. Depending on the guy's
comfort level - he may or may not want to reciprocate. Lots of g0ys take things
slowly and if this is part of the way your buddy chooses to be -- then accept
it. It's about him anyway, right? Be gentle & watch for his feedback cues.
Keep in mind what feels good to you & most importantly: Forget every BJ scene in
any porn you've ever watched. (They ain't accurate depictions of the act's
dynamics!). Be gentle & take your time. When your buddy finally shoots -
remember that you can tease out a series of "aftershocks" that will stretch out
his experience & pleasure -especially by using your lips & tongue to tender the
bundle of nerves at the base of his glans (dickhead). And here's a
suggestion: Whether you love the guy so much you want to drink him down, -- or
whether you treat his load like rinsewater; --have the decency to use a good
mouthwash before & afterward. It'll kill germs & make your breath something he'll want to
sleep beside. And sleeping with him is a good idea after the event. Don't
simply leave (it makes a guy feel used).
If you're not really tired --
then give your buddy a good body massage & let him know that he's a friend you
love to be around. And by all means -- if the guy seems withdrawn or
appears to have something "eating at him", be sure that he understands the g0ys
concept of M2M friendships regarding intimacy, respect & discretion.
Fellatio is an extremely intimate event. It's got to be handled with an
intense degree of love -- even if it's with a buddy you can be casual with,
wrestle & joke around with. Light heartedness aside -- when the guy is
groaning out his nutt & afterward; -- your body-language, comments & reactions can
build him up as a man or rip him down. Be considerate, gentle &
compassionate; --Use your words to encourage & build his esteem.
Lots of men suffer from a loud mental
minefield caused by Sixth-Graders, Sex-sellers & Sister-'Satan'. What I
mean by that is -for many men- there is a lifetime of negative messages that
have bombarded them (& their peers) from junior high school to their places of
religious exercise - plus misinformation pushed by pornographers. Huge
numbers of men have a roar of negative messages between their ears that
collectively has the power of a hypnotist. This roar of lies asserts that
same-gender intimacy between men is a form of moral turpitude and makes a man
less of a man. Those messages generally come from the misapplication of
various religious texts and the x-gender innuendos of the "gay" community.
This river of lies really begins to take hold around puberty and by the time
+63% of the male population hits 16, -the alleged dire pronouncements about
"liking men" has seriously traumatized them and totally supplanted
natural-affection & logical
reasoning in this subject with a panic-inducing mental-roar of peers,
pastors &
pornographers all telling them endless negativities about what liking other men
"ultimately means" (as opposed to being able to thoughtfully and calmly consider
the feelings for themselves). Fortunately, men who embrace the g0y
philosophy have (1) general experience upon doing so: Genuine FREEDOM from that roar of
lies which society has earlier put between their ears by years of repetition.
G0YS know that men can love other men without changing our mannerisms to a
camp/femme persona, nor embracing any x-gender philosophies, nor living
like a dung-beetle. G0YS know that it's natural for men to bond with &
love a select group of guys based on mutual interests, attractions &
personalities. G0YS know that we are simply within the majority of
normal guys, - and that "GAY" is a mindfuck-term that causes division among men
where none should exist. Men loving men is not the exception; --It is the
rule. G0YS know that. Gays, don't; -And sadly, -neither does
the bulk of society because of the giant mindfuck spectre of misinformation &
flawed reasoning that is the "gay community".
Because my relationships all started as friendships - they continued as
friendships - great friendships w. "benefits"; -- Not clingy, or possessive or
judgmental regarding petty stuff. It was nothing like the mindset of M/F
couples who "go steady", etc. We accepted that we were guys with lives
that had numerous aspects to the living of. We were "fine" with
girlfriends & accepted that guys could have other guy friends that they were
intensely intimate with. We knew that one guy cannot possess another - and
that love, friendships & relationships were not designed to cancel each other
out. No foot stomping ultimatums about "me me me - ONLY me"! That
kind of stuff is what women did (& what we somewhat expected of them - do to
the bad influence of modern social moirés).
There's an old expression that says that, "Love covers over a multitude of
sins...", & that's exactly what we experienced collectively: Having so much
compassion for each other that screw-ups were more often treated as a sad fact
of living life - rather than grounds to accuse & seek sanctions. And the
one thing I noticed that set our relationships apart from fair-weather
friendships was that we had times when there was a great amount of humility
applied appropriately to many of the situations that arose. It's hard to
want to hurt a guy when you know 1st hand how gentle, tender & wonderfully
intimate he can be. Were there explosions of anger & occasional fights?
Yeah. Did anyone stay angry for long? No. Were there exceptions to the
rule? Occasionally. However - male sex drive being what it is, it takes a great
deal of humility to be naked with another buddy & both admit that you can see
what makes each guy a beautiful guy - with the gentle compassion to
affectionately nudge the other toward the true nakedness of an orgasm - without
ever suggesting any inequality or masculine deficiency. A man is never
more vulnerable then when he's naked & another person is tendering his genitals.
Making love M2M is a sharing of empathy between men & a feeling of satisfaction
in helping the other achieve his goal of climax. Not selfish - but SelfLess and in the act of loving the other - you are mutually rewarded.
And
the result: I think it's clear: Extended families & intensely personal altruism
as that same need to love the other man extends to a deep serious desire to see
success, health & enjoyment in the lives of each other. In the Bible - the
intense love between David & Jonathan eventually resulted in David adopting
Jonathan's son Mephiboseth after Jonathan was killed in battle. Some may
argue that there is little evidence to suggest they had a "physical"
relationship. I'd say that hugs, kissing, mutual undressing, living in the
same palace, sharing property, secret meetings, circumventing the will of the
King, swearing oaths with each other before the LORD concerning their 'seed',
etc...makes more of a case for physical intimacy than not! Oh, and let's
not forget the song David wrote where he said Jonathan's love exceeded that of
women! Hello! The account of David & Jonathan probably makes one of
the BEST EXAMPLES of men loving each other with the ultimate in respect -
without either playing the "female role" or engaging in disgusting fetishes (AnalSex,
contact with feces & X-dressing were all strictly forbidden in the Ancient Hebrew Law).
Many of my peers are married with children today - and many dealing with the same
old ill-fitting labels that we managed to duck in school - now thru the
experiences of our kids & friend's kids. Some are not aware of the "g0y"
concept - & instead, probably have some inner turmoil & suspicions that they're
part of some "bisexual minority" instead of the +60% MALE-MAJORITY! However -
I've been reaching out & sending this link to those guys whom I still have
contact information for. G0YS.org changes lives - because it draws the
line of acceptable M2M behavior - not based on some arbitrary rule, - but by
drawing on the health & historical evidence of civilized cultures that go back +4000
years!
G0YS are men who can completely love
other men; - But in doing so, never confound the masculine-sexual-appreciation
of that love - never wanting men to play the "female role".
|