![](images/xy.gif)
![](images/0hYod.gif)
|
But
Dude, - I like women...too...
I've heard it too many times to count from other
guys: "But dude, - I like women..."
Of course -this is usually said after his man-sauce
is staining the bed-sheets mingled with mine; --& said as if saying it
somehow undoes that fact that he's shot a stream of jizz with another guy
while tendering his jizz-shooter. You can't unring a bell...
Here are the
"calm-your-paranoid-arse-down-facts": Virtually ALL guys have had an
experience with one or more guys during their lifetime that got so intimate - that
to speak of the details of the event in the locker-room would likely be a social
blunder in the extreme. And the vast majority of these intimate encounters
never involve either guy being "bitched (anally-penetrated)" nor
disrespected. There is no gender-bending, no arse-sex, nor any
thoughts of dressing either guy in sister's undies. And ultimately, -such
encounters are a totally masculine experience shared between a couple of friends who
happened to really like (even love) each other.
What's really a mind job
is that by 18 years of age, about 33% of guys have had this experience and about
33% of those who haven't - would like to! And most of them will deny it!
See,
-most guys know what
makes a guy an attractive guy. Think! How does a guy know how to make himself
look good unless he knows what makes guys look good? Cat's out of the bag now,
eh! And the fact is that most guys know a few select guys that they'd really enjoy
hanging out with -very closely together. And the simple fact is that there
are a few guys in the lives of most guys - that are such good friends and have
such a high degree of trust that they are literally the kind of friend/s you'd
trust to hold your nuts, etc. This is not the exception. It is the general rule.
On the other side of friendship; -Lots of guys who can enjoy the intimate
company of guys have a good number of friends whom they have NO physical
attraction to. The reasons are varied and complex.
ATTRACTION is a huge factor,
but REPULSION plays a large role too. See, lots of people who are
attracted to one gender are repulsed by the notion of being with the other in a
sexual sense. These are most often the people who believe that people are
either "STRAIGHT-OR-GAY". They cannot imagine how a person who loves gender
"X" could also love gender "Y". BUT, there are the guys who may not be
heavily attracted to one gender -but not repulsed by the possibility of an
intimate encounter with the right person of that gender, anyway. These are
the guys who wouldn't necessarily seek to get intimate with another guy, --but
might be willing to let the other guy get intimate with them if the overall situation was right.
So, guys who claim to be "straight" may well be --in the fact that they are
strongly attracted to women. BUT, (and this point is hugely important):
Some of those same guys are not opposed to being treated to a complimentary
orgasm by a best-friend -under the right conditions (they're not repulsed by the notion of being
tendered on by the same gender). Men generally have different levels of
attraction & repulsion. These (2) dynamics usually act together to
determine a guy's sexual behavior and whether he's an active aggressor or merely
a willing recipient of various types of affection.
This explanation is quite simple; -So why is the world so confused? Well, it comes down to
basic art appreciation. We
live in a world gone insane -where the predominant message was that you can like
Pop-Music
-OR- Classical-Music (for example) but gawd-forbid you like the "wrong"
style or both. And the terror made of rumors about people who like the
"wrong" style or (gulp) both -- is so extreme that people have
been
mortified to let others know that they do indeed appreciate BOTH. But: Appreciating
BOTH doesn't mean you hear both in the same light of appreciation, either.
Of course, I'm speaking in metaphors. The
"musical styles" I'm actually referencing are metaphors of the male/female
body-form & the related gamut of aesthetics about each person. The
fact is that +63% of the population can appreciate B0TH styles of gender to some
degree or another; --And some more than others. Like any form of art
appreciation, -the response to each "exhibit" varies from a
disinterested shrug to an emotional response so strong that the beholder plots
ways to possess it. Have you stashed some Country-Music in your Rock-Music
Library? +53% do! And almost nobody admits it ... which can be understood
when you examine the light of stereotypes that has been cast over the last +30 years.
There's
a certain relaxed atmosphere of friendship that exists in telling a buddy
that he has a nice backside & having it clearly understood that you are
offering a genuine compliment & not veiling some perversion that wants to
climb inside his anus! G0YS innately understand the
hard-line of the male-mindset on proper behavior.
GAYS don't. See,
g0ys are NOT resisting any sort of "temptation". We literally do
NOT want to ass-fuck anyone! G0YS don't !
And
that same mindset can offer a sense of self-esteem when talking in favorable
terms to a guy about his other physical features. So-called "straight"
guys are not afraid of intimacy with another guy as long as they know that
the other guy doesn't want to
them. G0YS know this by instinct. GAYS
won't.
Several years ago, I made friends with a
amateur male model from another country. Early on in our conversation,
he mentioned how often he was harassed by guys who wanted to ass-
him, & it really pissed him off. I agreed wholeheartedly with him and
although I'm a Kinsey-6, -nothing about my mannerisms suggest that I'm
attracted to guys, -so the tone was immediately set that I wasn't interested
in what the "GAYS" were. And it's true. I put friendship 1st and I
prefer to build them with beautiful men as an empathetic peer with their
interests at heart. The guy stayed at my residence for a couple of
weeks and I took photos & built a portfolio for him. I shot many pictures
-but made it clear that frontal nudes were not necessary because they're so
difficult to do tastefully; -Although backside nudes, swimwear & dress
clothes were part of the mix. If you truly love & respect a guy - casual
physical intimacy often escalates in frequency & quality. I eventually gave the guy a number of full-body massages
after workouts in which I'd comment of muscle development, symmetry
observations & the astonishing leg, calf, & foot development the guy had.
Some guys have stunning bone & musculature on their legs & this guy's lower
legs & feet were perfect in symmetry & thick-structure. By the time
his stay was over --we were good friends & the same guy who didn't like
"fag-aggression" was sleeping with me in the raw & beginning to spring wood
every time I'd massage him. So did I take this opportunity to liberate his
A-rated semen? No. You see, -he had originally contacted me because
of an ad I'd placed for a marketing business and I explained that I
hadn't placed the ad in hopes of scoring with a hott guy, -so to do that
would color the tone of my true intentions -which had been advertised as
business related. I told him that I'd gotten waaaay attached to him &
hoped that he'd visit my country again; --but that I wasn't going to let any
doubt enter the friendship as to my original intentions. 6 months
later, he booked a return trip & that's another chapter. However, -by
keeping the friendship on the professional side during his 1st trip --there
left no doubt as to my sincerity when I complimented his physique (including
a stunning, uncut penis that naturally hung thick & long keeping his
foreskin perfectly snug to it). Man - what a stunning package the
guys was! And he had an awesome personality. A year later, -a modeling agency picked him up & sent
him to Asia & that began a great career for him. Think he appreciated the
career help? Think he learned something about the nature of deep
friendship? If you truly love & respect a guy - casual physical intimacy
often escalates in frequency & quality.
Because the mindset of G0YS differs, so
is the nature of our relationships. I wasn't his "gay lover"; --I was his
friend who loved him. Semantics? He'd tell you it goes way beyond mere
semantics. See, the modeling industry has no shortage of "GAYS" in every
dimension of it. Finding a guy who loves his male friends as men
without the need to rubber-stamp the excesses or drama of flamers under the
amoral banner of unconditional tolerance -is a rarity. How rare? A guy
who loves guys & shuns AnalSex is among less than 25% of the so-called "gay"
population - but comprise about +60% of men overall. And when the same guy
actually stands against the practice or tolerance of it -he has just
alienated himself from term "GAY" completely. G0YS see it this
way: To merely stand together because of some sexual proclivity without
demanding moral-restraint against perilous acts; -That's like a pack of dogs
that all stick together -despite the fact that some are fukk'n-killing the
others. Why "tolerate" that! G0YS don't.
In North America (before the 1950's) -when people
used the term, "Best Friends", -there was a general undertone that the
term "BEST" might describe a component of the "Friendship"
that was so "BEST" that it was a PRIVATE MATTER between the
"Friends". Ward & June Cleaver feigned knowing nothing
about this sort of thing. And everybody accepted the unspoken notion because
there was generally no scandalous public mindset about what went on behind
closed doors between "best friends" (& men were generally less
demonstrative with their affection in public anyhow).
And from diaries
recovered from the 19th & early 20th centuries, we know that men who were
"best-friends" often shared a single bed on occasion & spoke of their mutual
affection & the magnitude of their friendships without straying into details
of intimate encounters -other than hint of them in circular language.
Generally, people do not speak frankly of their intimacy's fine-points. In
Japan, the mindset about such things is called "kin-jite" & it
generally means "forbidden subject". Not talking about these
things does not imply that they don't happen and it doesn't imply that there is
any scandal about them. And for the same reason that people generally don't
walk around in the nude outdoors, --people don't generally publically articulate their most personal
moments. It's simply a more private matter.
Some
men remember when: With the advent of television in the 1950's,
"do-gooders" (probably men who thought that Ward Cleaver was
the model American man + other people who really feared about who might be plotting Wally's kidnapping
& for what reasons) released a
series of commercials onto the television landscape that painted men who enjoyed
men -- as being deviants & predators. Nearly 100% of ALL women & "4th
graders" instantly believed the insinuation. 5th grade boys instantly
became paranoid -with denial of their dualistic feelings as puberty hit them.
And +63 of men everywhere (who didn't realize that what each felt was common to
a
whopping +63% of all men) suddenly became invisibly oppressed under threat of emasculation w.
exposure of their various (yet completely normal) pasts w. other guys. The
"church-lady", -in a last minute attempt to divert attention away from
her own whoredom -played the ace she had up her garter on the 6 o'clock news.
And it worked: The connection between the
"ho-mo-sek-shual" and wanting to "molest little Wally" was made,
& thus began the campaign to mischaracterize what +60% of the population had
been up to in discretion since men existed, (by accusing it of being on par with "plotting
little Wally's demise"). In the 1950's -the vacuum of real information
was filled by the TV -with a gigantic menu of Aunt Bea's apple-pie-lies & general
misrepresentations about the fluidic nature of human sexuality. What had started as the
murmurings of some of religion's most paranoid about what "people on the fringe
might be up to", -became a misguided set of judgments on a section of
society -unwarranted & undeserved. It was a message just as insane as:
"If a man asks to date your daughter, -he probably wants to anally rape
her." Society scoffs at such insanity, -but rumors about what certain men
did with each other became the rumor about ALL such men who enjoyed the company
of men. And society, generally unaware that +63% of the population had
same-gender attractions (the survey process was uncertain at the time, & censored
Kinsey anyhow), -was told that it was only a "minority" of 2-3 percent.
People are much more likely to believe a giant lie than a small one.
Hitler's minister of propaganda had exploited that fact & almost nobody
seemed to see the pattern reemerge. Certainly history teaches us that most
people learn nothing from it.
In the 1960's, men who were active in the
subculture that would eventually be called "GAY", generally recall
that the men who were fixated on being feminine or engaging in anal-sex were a
fringe minority -& were generally looked down on -even within the community of
men who actively searched out male company. That fact is of monumental importance
because the subculture that defined itself in terms of the downlow was about to
become redefined by the media - bent on portraying the fringe as if it represented
what was "par". Media eventually came to showcase
those into Ass-Sex & gender-non-conforming; --
calling that particular mix: "GAY". Drag-queens
& Arse-Pounders got the spotlight & those opportunists
like Dr. Jerry Falwell & Bubba the Bigot Baptist were there to push the lying stereotype & exploit insane-level "anti-gay"
fundraising$. And men who could have quietly shared intimacy
with a male friend -context'd in masculine respect -were now generically
villainized along with the
Arse-Queens & child-molesters (NAMBLA's foundations were part of that same
"gay" lib movement)! And it is the stigmas of those mischaracterizations that has kept men of quiet character & good consciences
underground to this very day, -while pornographers & perverts push anal-penetration as if
it's the "gay par" as a twisted parody on male/female moirés.
And that is how the best aspects of M2M friendships
were demonized & repackaged; -And how normal men with buddy-lov'n feelings (+63%) were coerced
in the mid 20th century to feel
"dirty", "sinful" & socially rejected as they were cast
in the light of the 2-3% butt-fuck fringe; -- When the fact
of the matter was that they/we are completely normal & in the unrepresented majority
(no thanks to mass media)!
How
does this medicine taste? Truth has a strong flavor & most people either
love it or hate it -but everyone notices it!
I know what some of you are thinking: "What!
The media,-misrepresent something! Preposterous! Surely if it's in the papers or
on TV, - it must be true!". And the handful of you who live as if that's
the case can feel feel free to egress. However, for those of you who have begun
to have your eyes opened, -read on.
Canada-Bro
writes:
"I was a total jock &
yeah, I knew I was a hottie at 14! I was also discovering that I thought
some other
guys were hott too, -& with my ultra-conservative background added to how
people talked about "fags", -those feelings really bothered me & I
hoped they'd go away. Well, at my 15th, eh ... (I mean 18th- that's the ticket), my stud-bud Bryan invited me overnight
while his parents were gone & we got into his dad's liquor cabinet (Bry
completely set me up). We
got buzzed & then wrestling & Bry was really owning me -taking my
clothes off one thing at a time while making fun of my drunk-buzz'n arse as he did
it. I was majorly turned on & too buzz'd to care that it showed.
Once he had my sweat pants down past my shorts -my raging boner was totally
exposed -having formed & crawled right out the piss-slit in my briefs.
Seeing it, Brian just said, 'Phuck bro, -you've got an awesome d!ck!',
and from that moment on I was never self conscious about having a hard d!ck
around Bry again. And that was good because after that night -he couldn't leave my
d!ck
alone! He seemed to get-off while getting me off, -starting that night when I
awoke in a buzz'd-fog from an erotic dream & discovered Bry giving me a class-act blow-job. I came so freak'n hard
that I swore off jack'n myself; --& Bry was glad to do the deed from that point
on. Of course, wrestling him down & getting him to pop was pretty satiating
too. We'd go multiple rounds all night long sleeping in between sessions &
usually waking up with a steel-hard d!ck in the other guy's mouth & 69'ing each
other most of the time. If you happen to be a good looking guy - you'll figure
out early on that lotsa guys are into guys on the "DownLow".
Compare that account to the following:
"You'd think that if you're a guy who likes guys that they'd be a ton of
great stories to read -especially due to the Internet being everywhere.
Well, as it turns out, -if you're a guy who actually loves guys and respects
men in general; --There are darn few good reads
online. Sadly, what I've
found are lots of stories that start out fine, --but when it gets to the guy
finally getting another into the sack; --That's when stuff turns to shit! And I
mean SHIT --quite literally. Story after sick, fukk'n story seems to
cumulate in one guy FUCKING another up the ARSE; -Playing in SHIT; --or around
it; --smelling shit; licking arses. WTF! People who write that shit are
some sick mother fukkerz! I think the parasites that live in shit must
have made it to their brains & fixated them on spreading the next generation
of parasites by trying to
eroticize shit! Dirty, disrespectful fukks!
If there was ever anything that formed a barrier between who I am vs. the
generic "FAG", it's my good sense to stay clear of the shit-pipe &
never expect a man to play the role of a khunt with his arse as the
stand-in! If their was ever any fetish more disrespectful, repulsive &
contrary to common-sense --it's shit-play! FAGGOTS (rhymes with
"maggots") PLAY IN SHIT! It's a hard, brown line that my buds & I
refuse to cross! Never done it; & don't want to! Just because I
like being with a naked bro from time to time & enjoying his body, gentle
intimacy & tendering his amorous rod until he shoots white melting ropes; --None of that requires
that we break out the disinfection kit or need to plug our noses. We can
go at it all night and nobody will smell like an arse-accident or broken sewer
line! And generally: We won't be casually exchanging diseases (because
steering clear of the shit-hole reduces the chance -like 5000% or even
less!)! To me, -a hott story is about stud-buddies who take a naked roll
in the sack, -enjoy each other's masculine bod & mannerisms -until they each
splooge a cumm-gusher & become even better friends from the sharing of
it. And nobody ever gets fukk'd up the arse, nor called degrading names
like "bitch", "girl" or "queen". Got
masculine-respect? Arse-Fukkerz have wrecked what the term
"best-friends" can really be all about by dipping it in their twisted
sh!t!"
"GAY" has become a social-movement
hijacked by various pervert-groups; --All attempting to redefine human sexuality
& make acceptable the very practices that nature itself abhors
(You know when nature abhors an act because disease & injury accompany it by the
very nature of the act itself)! Anyone
who wears the "GAY"-tag simply because they like their own gender /too,
should think it over & perhaps adopt a different label (ahem).
"GAY" tells everyone that same-sex attractions are a "minority
condition". The truth is that ALL human life starts out with the same general
body form: Female by default. This is why men have nipples (ever ponder that
one?)! Several weeks after
conception, testosterone causes the "male" (y-switch) coded body to masculinize - changing some physical traits (I.E: forming a penis) &
rewiring the brain somewhat. This differentiation on the mental level also
accounts for why boys are generally more risk-taking & more aggressive than
girls. However, understanding that FEMALE is the default body form from
which the male is adapted also gives some cues as to WHY amBIsexuality is the
normal male sexual perspective. Without the effects of testosterone, the
natural progression would be female development and a statistical preference for
male company later in life; --That (woman'esque) is the DEFAULT brain wiring. Testosterone
in-utero changes that and the modified brain wiring becomes more "female-interested"
when puberty happens (prior to which, -girls are perceived as
"yucky"). However, due to the nature of the rewiring -the
"default" abilities to appreciate masculine cues are seldom ever
completely disabled. And the stronger -more pronounce effects of
"maleness" resulting from the androgenizing effects of testosterone
are more easily recognized by all men & generally seen as desirable traits.
This is also why men tend to gravitate & bond
with "manly men", & also why men admire a well developed male
body-form (& why muscle magazines have lots of pictures). Now, when that bond occurs & a man finds his "manly"
friend to be caring, nurturing, compassionate & a positive effect on his
emotional esteem, -whatever innate brain chemistry remains from
default-fetal-wiring can
(& often does) act as a gateway for openness to physical bonding -expressed
in the context of respectful touch with varying sexual undertones. This
form of physical appreciation is not a substitute for appreciation of what is
"female". It doesn't happen as a way to imagine that another guy is a
woman. It's an aesthetic appreciation of masculinity. As such, the general context
of the contact is often socially framed in more aggressive & perceptually
"male" activities -such as wrestling during play. As one guy explained:
"I like a guy's developed musculature because it's powerful & impressive;
-not because I have any desire to imagine his larger pecs as a female's tits nor
anything like that. Wrestling with a guy is a way to gauge his overall
physical abilities while making contact in a context that is well
respected. I often hope it all leads is to a deeper & more affectionate,
discrete relationship off the mat." Or as another clarified: "I know what makes
masculinity attractive & I enjoy pleasuring my buddy's body with massage
& more personal contact - because I enjoy
making him feel good; -- Like the ultimate form of art appreciation in which the
art appreciates you right back. It's the very fact that his responses are masculine that makes the
experience so enjoyable. He feels the same way; -& being BI -he's able to
enjoy both genders in proper context. He isn't pretending that anything about me
is a 'woman'. I'm a masculine guy & I'd be p!ssed
if he was trying to picture me as a chick or my arse as a snatch. That
would be unnatural & frankly: fukk'd-up! The fact I see masculine men
as beautiful is not in any way a distraction to how I see women. Being
amBIsexual only becomes confusing when people believe a lie that asserts that
loving Adam somehow detracts from loving Eve. That's preposterous!
It's possible to like BOTH Vanilla AND Chocolate without needing
to pretend that one is the other; --Or needing to deny one for the sake of
appearances. Just don't ask me to shit in my vanilla & call it
chocolate (as so many gays do)!"
The level of physical attraction often varies in
proportion to the masculine cues thrown off by each guy in the friendship. As
one guy pointed out: "I have male friends whom I have no physical
attraction, -just great friends. Others I find so magnetic that I want to get
physical with them as soon as the opportunity is right, & see what
escalations they're open to over the long run. And
I've discovered that a lot of guys feel the same things & have the same
goals. I love all my friends, but some I like to love repeatedly all night.
And by 'love', -I mean as a guy, -never as a stand in for a woman in any way
shape or form. And by "Love", I mean in the context that I care
about their lives, happiness, families & interests. It's not a shallow
thing. The fact I can appreciate a beautiful male body simply adds a slamm'n
dimension to those friendships."
And these feelings of affection between men are
normal. NORMAL. Say it. The real mind job happens when guys are led to believe
the lie that asserts 'that
only their
feelings for women are normal, but feelings for other guys are somehow bad or
even "evil"'. Trying to suppress natural affection in the guise of
an exclusive skirt-chasing-mentality, - takes a massive toll on a huge number of guys -many who
spend their lives in hidden shame -trying to figure out "what's wrong with
them", rather than venture the thought that LOTS of the most trusted
people/sources in their lives have been feeding them giant lies & regurgitated bullsh1t
about M2M intimate relationships! "My religious leaders, teachers
& family members - ALL lying to me?"! Damn right! You're
not the problem. The LIES are the
problem.
It's easier to like a guy who's easy on the eyes,
-but most guys express the feelings that the guy's mannerism needs to be
appropriate. As one comment expressed: "Even if the guy looks like
Hercules, -if he swishes when he walks or talks like my eccentric aunt maggie, -I'm turned off
immediately. Being a man involves projecting a masculine persona. I'm not
talking about needing to wear loin-cloths while eating raw meat, either. I'm
saying that guys who have personality issues that create glitches in their
behavior that are effeminate, girly, whiny or perceived as obvious affronts to
masculine norms --those guys are projecting what I believe to be signs of much
deeper potential personality problems beneath. Any guy who shifts into
"camp" mannerism - is telling everyone around him that THAT
persona is more acceptable to himself than what he is naturally like. That's a
massive warning signal about the broadcaster's self-esteem, & most guys know
by instinct to set some distance. Being turned off by campy, effeminate,
creepy
men is not a sign of homophobia. It's a healthy aversion away from
repulsive 'women' (some of which just happen to have d!cks)."
Another comment read: "If I
noticed a guy trying to get another guy's attention by adjusting his posture or
mannerism to appear more female -that just turned me off. I find something
ethically repulsive about a guy willing to put on a skirt to attract another
guy. And any guy who would find such a display somehow desirable is
probably not the sort I'd want in my inner circle of friends. It
may be 'freaks simply hunting freaks' -but I find it disturbing that in the next
breath many people want to label that sort of perverse behavior as representative of
"male same-sex-attraction". It isn't. It's one
loser settling for another
loser of the same-sex -advertising that he's willing to play the female
role. It's just 1-step away from 'Yeah, I'll screw you, but you've gotta
wear this bag over your head & only after I finish this drink.'! It's not
attraction. It's a negotiated settlement that mandates a denial-of-reality as
one of the terms. Ass-Fucking (the 'man-gina') is birthed from the same dysfunctional
fukk'n mentality. Freaks."
And yet even another comment reads: "Guys doing effeminate guys are creepy.
It's like a guy who doesn't have enough self-esteem to know better, -agreeing to
bitch himself out to the biggest loser in town who can't get any women
(so he'll settle for a guy in drag once he's had enough to drink)! That's
not the behavior of guys who love guys. It's the behavior of losers who can't
get a girl -but will settle for any guy who's pretending to be a woman! Pris'n-bitch'n
mentality. Yeech! Because I totally love my buds, -I'd never bitch
a Bro!"
In general, -people are shallow. Suggesting that loving
guys somehow should make me act like a woman is like saying that liking lamb chops
should somehow make me act like a wolf. Do you mind if I piss on your leg (after
all -it's just my orientation!)? It may sound absurd, -but this is exactly the
type of message that the so-called "gay-male" community/media promotes. This
is why "GAY" functions constantly have the words "INTERSEXED"
& "TRANSGENDERED" included in the group's description. And
it's bullsh!t -based on a giant set of lies about 'what it
means to love your own gender' -promoted by a loud mass of sexually destructive
minorities & religious hypocrites. Most men recognize that fact, & regardless of their own
same-gender-attractions - avoid any association with the term
"GAY". They're simply not willing to embrace an
emasculating lie, -a lie pushed by the media (composed of people who are
generally low-brow & write articles to the same type of
audience).
So, to understand what's NORMAL -- you 1st
need to discard the counterfeits. In this case (to make my point), -forget
everyone who wears the "GAY" label openly. Pretend they don't exist anymore
-nor does anything they espouse (too much random social-noise). They were never
here. Instead, imagine that society NEVER
lost it's sanity, and for the last 3000+ years, -it's been generally accepted
that guys are amBIsexual & hook up with guys as a natural part of their
friendships without anyone being b!tched (analsex is
illegal) & nobody makes any mental-leaps about loving guys having anything to do
with female-mannerisms (Women have female mannerisms because they're women --
not because they like guys). What's it look like? It looks like Greece
-about 3000 years ago; Where male friendships were much more close & often public;
--And the only "FAGS" were guys who did the Arse- -Fukk (illegal &
considered a perversion -use of a man in the proxy of a woman)! "Boy-Scouts"
in ancient Greece was an organization where guys 18-25 (median) took an
interest in teen-guys on the "maturing-side" of puberty & 1-on-1
mentored them in everything a guy needs to know from fighting, to sex; -&
generally forming powerfully intimate friendships that lasted a lifetime.
Due to the greater responsibility of marriage, -guys were encouraged to wait
longer until, --enjoying each other's masculine wiles to facilitate normal
sexual frequency & coincidently -reduce unwanted pregnancies. Because M2M sexual
intimacy (without penetration) is generally so safe, --guys who lived the Greek
Model generally stayed disease-free (important in a culture with NO drugs to
treat STDs/STIs)!
One writer observes: "The
Greeks let the cat out of the bag: Guys generally like sexy guys! I've
lost count of the number of times I was with another guy wrestling, or being
close & friendly -when the guy would get wood! So many guys seemed to
get panicky when they got wood with another guy! It was like there was
some terrible taboo to be avoided! Of course, --there WAS an unspoken terrible
"taboo". It was a word - "GAY" slapped on any guy who
might have the least bit of physical affection for another guy!
"GAY" was the worse cuss you could throw at another guy --because what
was really implied was that a guy -who liked guys - might buttfuck. And
every guy knew that buttfucking was simply NOT what guys who respected guys did
(and they were right about that)! The conclusion ... the observation
that seems ironic is that society's' acceptance of the gay-mantra - that
"analsex" = "male/male sex" - is the very stigma & stereotype
that DESTROYED male/male intimacy among statistically normal men! And the
gay-male community continues to push that deadly message - even after decades of
unparalleled disease, injury & death (Deaths that number into millions upon
millions - as a result of promoting AnalSex)!
But as it stands today, brother: If you
love your own
gender/too & people discover it -- they will say that
you are "GAY" ... (and a buttfukker by insinuation! Even
if you're not.)! So, most guys try to "play it straight" by denying the wood they got
when around some of their buddies. Those of us who had figured out how the buttfuck-rumors worked (& it was the buttfuckers who were the actual FAGS
... not guys who could appreciate a hott-bodied-bro); -& we steered clear
of FAGS, their associations & groups; --while we covertly hooked up with
less-inhibited hott buddies & drank deeply from their masculine endowments
without mixing in any sort of buttfukking nor genderbending disrespect! I
kept mental-notes about who got wood & panicky around handsome guys. As the drinking age
set in, --a number of those same guys discovered that a few shots would take the
edge off their same-sex inhibitions. Those I took home often got educated in addition to
emptying their nuts with another guy (me) in an attitude of love & respect
(usually the nutt-emptying happened 1st with the education in the
morning). Sadly, several peers who took to boozing ended up with FAGS
(before a g0y could school them) -- & the fudge-packers
didn't show them any real respect; -- the only lesson they learned was from a
drag-queen called "MISS-EDUCATION". MISS-EDUCATION taught them
that they were "REPRESSED" & part of some "BUTT-FUCKING-MINORITY".
Now, that belief might be a good reason to drink if there was one! Of
course, we know that it's normal for guys to dig hott-guys. It's the
buttfuckers that cause the confusion (so, steer clear of their delusion)!"
So:
If you're a guy who's been beat up by others or yourself for merely liking guys; --It's
time to wake the fuck up; --take a squeegee to your conscience & practice
flipping the bird at those too arrogant to listen to facts. Don't waste
another minute living in false condemnation for something +63% (or more) of the
male population has in common & are generally in denial about (no thanks to the
decades of media induced
fear-of-fagdom). Whether a guy likes women has absolutely no bearing on
whether he likes guys /too! The problem has arisen because men have
allowed arse-fuckers to define what male/male relationships consist of.
That's like letting rapists define what male/female relationships consist
of! Let common-sense framed by a healthy historical precedent be your
guide! If it rips out arse-holes & spreads diseases like the plague; --then
it's probably just fuck'n dumb (who gives a flying fuck how many people are
advertising it)! Man up. Accept the fact that you like vegetables
AND meat. Don't let anyone tell you that the 2 are the same. They're
unique in form & require different treatment by their very nature!
Women are designed for penetration. Men are NOT. Only a fucking
idiot suggests that an arse is on par with a snatch. And society is jam packed
with fucking idiots & their mindless followers! Man up. Flip
them off. Embrace masculine compassion framed with
wisdom! "Tolerating everything" is the giant moral-weakness of
the culture calling itself "GAY"; --Because men of good consciences
will NEVER embrace a philosophy that requires them to turn their gut-sense of
masculine respect off. "GAY" -by it's very nature is a term that will
gain acceptance only by the same degree that society loses it's healthy-moral
sensibilities. The gender twisting insanity pushed by "GAYS" will spread
into other areas of society! Be warned!
A tale of two tails...
![](images/BothMenWTF.jpg)
When I discovered that the person (pictured
from the back on the far left) was a "guy", -I'll admit that part of me wanted
to slip back away quietly without being discovered by him and thus avoid the
inevitable question I was sure would find it's way out of me if conversation
ensued: "So, does your sister know you're wearing her girlie jeans?". And
yet, we are told by the "experts of gay fashion" that those exact same jeans are
made for men. Uh-huh. Men...men who lack testicles, perhaps. When I see that
image & hear the term "jeans" ... I think of another term that sounds exactly
the same, -- 2 chromosomes specifically -- both shaped like "X's".
Which
raises the question: Am I simply being an ass with a baseless distaste for what
is called "progressive gay fashion", --or is my gut feeling to back away quickly
(from the man wearing the denim girlie leggings) based on actual information
about what is normal vs. what is forced & bizarre? I believe that anyone with an
I Q higher than a parsnip will immediately recognize the appropriateness of the
fit that the jeans in the right side of the frame have on the person
wearing them. The cut of the clothing is for a man --not because somebody
in the fashion industry issues a decree, -but because they fit the actual male
anatomy based on the reality of how men develop. You see, - higher
testosterone levels combined with physical activity develop leg muscles and
bones in men that are bigger, stronger and shaped quite differently than that of
women (who generally have wider hips & smaller musculature). Trying to jam
male anatomy into clothing clearly cut to accommodate female anatomy (left
image) illustrates a designer who is disconnected from reality &/ simply fuck'd
in the head (& yes - that's my technical analysis). Of course, - the "gay"
community has been trying to jam men into the shape of women for a long time and
some people are shallow enough to buy the lie (quite literally). It's bad
enough when the emperor has no clothes, but now he's being dressed up like the
queen & we're all supposed to applaud & think it's great. Nope. Not
buying it. Great fashion made for men is made to accommodate what testosterone
does to an active, healthy, strong male body. G0YS know this by instinct.
It's simply "REALITY". And "reality" is something that the "gay" community
seems bent on disregarding.
You G0YS don't do
what???
The vast majority of people who hear the term
"GAY" immediately fall prey to media messages & make the mental
connection with AnalSex (and gender-bending by inference). Surveys done recently show that +75% of the
"GAY-MALE COMMUNITY" admit to having AnalSex. What was once
considered the action of the fringe is now the majority "gay-male" experience (that's the
power of suggestion over several decades)!
So let me show you the mental
progression:
Most guys shun the notion of analsex. Most guys are
also amBIsexual. Yes. Most. Because of gay-media lies, -the suggestion of men loving men
has been welded to anal-fetishes. Therefore, in the minds of most men,
-their same-sex attractions represent a moral shortfall because they presume
that being intimate with another man will somehow lead to to the act of AnalSex. Because they feel that act is so repugnant, -they suppress/deny
their same-gender affections under the terror of being associated with an act
they find morally reprehensible (& for good reason).
Now, reveal G0YS: The guy who discovers that
same-gender-affections generally do NOT lead to AnalActs has uncovered a
very-large demographic of men we call "G0YS"; -- AND the majority of g0ys
are amBIsexually identified (not exclusively SameSex attracted). Suddenly: The lights
between the ears turns on -often for the 1st time in a guy's life! As soon
as all notions of "transgender" & "buttfuck" are removed from the fact that guys
know what makes a guy good-look'n (it's the default brain-wiring for everyone),
a guy is able to intensify his best friendships & accept the notion of physical affection without
the AnalSex stigmas of "GAY" stereotypes threatening the masculine
integrity of the friendship/s-gone-best.
"Hello,
I'm
writing to thank you for your website g0ys.org. Two years ago, in my early
twenties and before, I was an evil legalistic and religious bigot suffering in
extreme self-denial of same-sex desire, but about a year ago, the self-denial
began to collapse. I sought a place in gay Christian culture, yet as blind as
I was, I still couldn't reconcile their theology with logic. I had come across
g0ys.org on multiple occasions, but I dismissed the site because it looked
like more homosexual lies. Eventually, I read through the content. I didn't
understand the theology
articles, for I was blind at the time, but the idea that I could experience
physical, emotional, and sexual fulfillment together with another guy---without
anal penetration---stuck, and that piece of knowledge led to the whole dam
failing..."
-
Regards,Josh
The great irony is that
the MAJORITY of men love
the aesthetics of masculine beauty, -but are confused by lying mass "gay" media that
distorts the natural form of such intimacy.
IF what the Greeks knew 3000 years
ago was the message today (that men generally love handsome men, too, -but
playing the female-role is shameful/illegal); --then "G0YS" would be
the GLOBAL-DEFAULT male friendship model, and sexually transmitted diseases among men would be among the
LOWEST STD RATES (as opposed to the "GAY-STD" rate that is +4300%
higher than the population in general)!
Man-up: Go G0Y!
|